Consistency and Accuracy when Describing Geological Structures and Rock Fabrics
Would you categorise these geological structures as joints, fractures or discontinuities? For scale, the black shapes are goats. Iraqi Kurdistan. ? 2011 Graham Banks. All rights reserved

Consistency and Accuracy when Describing Geological Structures and Rock Fabrics

Graham Banks, Senior Principal Geologist, WSP Canada.

Sarah Cox, Senior Geotechnical Consultant, WSP USA.

Steve Rogers, Senior Principal Geoscientist WSP Canada.

Luca Zorzi, Principal Geologist, WSP Canada.

Scot Foster, Senior Vice President, Global Mining Client Program, WSP Global Inc. (USA).

Geologists and engineers on mineral exploration and mining projects often assign different words or modes of rock deformation to the same rock feature. The consequences of this variety can be significant for evaluating the stability of a mine. By implementing rigorous guidelines and accurate vocabulary, the mining industry can mitigate the risks and failures caused by these inconsistencies, and deliver more reliable interpretations.

If you are a geologist, geotechnical engineer or rock mechanics specialist, test yourself with the questions below and compare your answers with your colleague’s:

·???????What’s the difference between a fracture, a joint and a discontinuity?

·???????Is an infilled joint a vein?

·???????Is a fault a portion of a rubble zone or vice versa??

·???????What are the criteria scientists use when they distinguish “Fault” from “Shear zone”?

·???????Why do people categorize a rock fracture as “healed” when broken rocks cannot self-repair or alleviate stressful emotions?

·???????How big and influential is a “major” or “primary” fault for a mine’s stability?

·???????Which of the many structural data gathering guidelines is rigorous enough?

Would you label the curviplanar structures as fractures, joints, faults, shears, veins or discontinuities?

No alt text provided for this image
Pen for scale. Rocky Mountains, Canada. ?2012 Graham Banks. All rights reserved.


Accurate terminology and description of rock mass structures and fabrics is crucial to the mining industry due to the unique and distinctive challenges that demand collaboration across multiple practice areas.?Clear communication of rock mass structures and fabrics is essential for: rock mass characterization, mine stability predictions, structural geology models, mineral resource estimates, geotechnical assessments, hydrogeology studies and geohazard analyses. A shared, correct vocabulary is also crucial to communicate the implications of rock features to mining economists, risk analysts and investors.

Would you categorise these geological structures as joints, fractures or discontinuities?

No alt text provided for this image
For scale, the black and white dots are goats. Iraqi Kurdistan. ? 2011 Graham Banks. All rights reserved.

Unfortunately, the terminology and methods used to describe geological and human-induced rock structures often lack consistency. Even seemingly straightforward terms like "fracture" have become misused and confusing. Some geological dictionaries and textbooks are also inconsistent, or their definitions are not appropriate for industry applications. This variety creates biases, uncertainties, doubts, disagreements, and even project failures. Using our preferred words reduces our ability to objectively describe and compare rock mass features. Yet, this variety and incoherence is unnecessary, for example a rock joint has characteristics that clearly distinguish it from a fault and a tension gash.

To address this issue, the mining community would benefit from a standardized document that accurately defines vocabulary and techniques for describing rock structures and fabrics. Industries such as healthcare, aviation, and petroleum geology rely on precise and consistent language usage across organizations. It's time for the mining industry to have the same. Mining geoscientists and engineers can then be as consistent with deformed rock vocabulary as doctors and airline pilots are with their technical vocabulary.

No alt text provided for this image
Image modified from Actioncoach, online.

At WSP Mining, we are taking the lead and compiling an up-to-date glossary of rock fabrics, geological structures and their networks. These definitions are derived from peer-reviewed glossaries created by scientists known for their accuracy and rigour. The glossary also contains a recommended sequence to observe, describe and then model rock mass fabrics and structures. Let's enable consistency and accuracy in mining vocabulary and techniques when describing rock mass structures and fabrics. Together, we can improve communication, reduce uncertainties, and ultimately increase the chance of success in mining projects.

Reach out to us if you’d like to know or discuss more.

#structuralgeology #geotechnicalengineering #rockmechanics #exploration #mining #WSPMining

nigel baker

Geologist at GEUS

1 年

interesting. this is a great idea to try to get more consistency. is this document available?

回复
Thomas Parkinson

Chartered Engineering Geologist at WSP

1 年

Hi Graham, would be interesting to have sighting of this glossary/summary to compare with best practices and terms used in the UK. Thanks

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Graham Banks的更多文章

  • Thanks again...

    Thanks again...

    Thank you again to the participants in the BHP lunch and learn seminar-discussion today..

  • Thanks again for the valuable discussions...

    Thanks again for the valuable discussions...

    Thanks again to the participants of yesterday's enjoyable and insightful discussion at the University of Western…

其他会员也浏览了