Consider Value-Based Health Care as an Alternative to Wellness

Consider Value-Based Health Care as an Alternative to Wellness

In an evolving labor market where employees are expecting (and receiving) higher pay and better perks, employers often compete in the race for top talent by offering better and bolder benefits packages. And with the unemployment rate as low as 4% as of this June, that race is clearly heating up.

HR managers must find innovative ways to attract—and keep—the best candidates. Better benefits is an obvious answer. According to a survey by Randstad US, only 39% of workers are satisfied with their current benefits offerings, and 66% agree that a strong assortment of benefits and perks is the largest determining factor when they are choosing between different job offers.

In fact, benefits are even more important than the number on a paycheck: 61% of respondents say they would accept a lower salary in exchange for a better benefits package.

Of course, one challenge comes in defining “better benefits.” According to the Society of Human Resource Management, 34% of employers expanded their benefits packages last year, with one common trend being to offer good-sounding “employee wellness programs.”

Unfortunately, there’s not much research to support the efficacy of such programs. One study found that money spent on workplace wellness did almost nothing to improve employee health, because the already healthy employees are the most likely to participate. Employee wellness programs also don’t do much in the way of cutting costs, either. At $100-$150 per employee per year, along with monetary incentives to use them and administrative time to ensure compliance with relevant regulations, there can be a hefty price tag for something that sounds sweeter than it works.

What do employees want?

To really meet the needs of employees, it’s not enough to slap a few new programs on the books and call it a day. To truly bring about lasting change in the health of your employees, get to know them and their unique needs. Hold focus groups or conduct surveys to find out what’s important to them when it comes to the health of their families.

Do you have positions that come with a higher risk of injury? Implement a stretching program. It’s well-known that stretching regularly improves flexibility, which can lower the chances of injury. Should it be necessary, remove any barriers to high quality physical therapy — the reduction in avoidable musculoskeletal procedures easily pays for itself. And, of course, your workforce is happier and healthier without pain. In the case of Rosen Hotels and Resorts, for instance, programs like these reduced workplace injuries by 25%.

Are the majority of your employees at a high risk for pregnancy complications (e.g. diabetes, HIV, advanced maternal age, hypertension, etc.)? Be proactive about providing family planning information and classes, and help these individuals manage their pregnancies from a health perspective to ensure everything goes smoothly.

Value-based care

In addition to wellness, one of the key elements of a great health benefits package is a plan that supports value-based primary care, an alternative to the traditional fee-for-service model, where doctors are reimbursed according to the number of services they provide, with no regard for quality or patient satisfaction. Not only does this model improve patient outcomes and deliver a significantly better experience, but it can also lower costs for you and your employees.

And that’s no small concern, as the 2016 Strategic Benefits—Assessment and Communication of Benefits report from SHRM found that 30% of HR professionals indicate their company’s main strategic priority for their benefits package is to control rising health care costs.

Sadly, the current system in this country is riddled with “get in, get out” 10-minute appointments, incentivized by high patient volume and low reimbursement rates (often for largely unnecessary or low-evidence procedures). Doctors frequently are driven to recommend costly procedures. With value-based primary care, your employees can enjoy more time with their providers and more coordinated care and technology solutions that improve connectivity and patient-provider engagement.

Instead of doing what’s hot now, invest in programs and initiatives that feed the flame behind your employees’ health and well-being. You will end up with a more productive, more satisfied workforce and a health plan that lowers costs, improves value and raises your recruiting and retention power.

The full op-ed was published originally in TLNT

__________

Dave Chase is the co-founder of the Health Rosetta (a LEED-like organization for healthcare), and author of the book, “The Opioid Crisis Wake-up Call: Health Care is Stealing the American Dream. Here's How We Take it Back.” Follow the link to the book for a free download of the book. Chase's TEDx talk was entitled "Healthcare stole the American Dream -- here's how we take it back." See the Health Rosetta website for how to get involved, resources and how to join others to support its mission.

Subscribe to the Health Rosetta newsletter to help transform healthcare and to stay ahead of healthcare changes. Follow Dave on Twitter

Click for information on speaking engagements.

Also, Pac Bell provided in-house exercise gym for employee use. When they merged with Southwestern Bell in the mid nineties, that all went away. Go figure. I guess CA execs were ahead of their time & TX/NJ execs.

回复

I worked for PacBell/ATT for 27 years. You can’t believe the horrible food that was brought for Breakfast & lunch during sales campaigns. We had MANY overweight staff & quite a few with diabetes. The company was pretty good about stand-up desks for staff whose doctor wrote them a request, particularly if a WC issue. While our union, CWA, negotiated for good healthcare (but sucky dental), the company certainly could have drawn up policies that encouraged health. Sedgwick handles their WC. Not good. I had a 10% perm disability on my R hip with lifetime medical for it. It eventually had to be replaced. My HMO did it after Sedgwick denied the MD’s recommendation. Crazy! AT&T paid for it either way. BTW, the union reps are mostly overweight so maybe they resisted policies for healthful ways. ????

回复
Shelley C. Koltnow, JD, MBA, FACHE

Healthcare Compliance Consultant

5 年

It is hard to control any individual's health decisions and practices, not to say we shouldn't care or try to influence wellness at a population health level. However we need to find reliable ways to care for health conditions and illnesses in a cost effective manner that is clinically effective too. Must do this to provide value and sustain the system.

回复
Arvind R. Cavale, MD, FACE, FCPP, PCEO

Clinical Endocrinologist, Diabetes & Endocrinology Consultants of Pennsylvania, LLC

6 年

Great point, Stanley Schwartz MD and Dave Chase. We have beating this drum for over a year now - sadly employers are hamstrung by benefits advisors that are either afraid to look outside the box or are happy with status quo. One stat at Signature Diabetes?is a 94% Diabetes Prevention Rate over 5 years! Yet this seems to be a massively hard sell as compared to "wellness" programs as stated above. I'd suggest folks view this 2-part interview (with permission) https://www.dhirubhai.net/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6471457682938163201 and https://www.dhirubhai.net/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6471458281935114240 to understand how "value-based" patient-centric, individualized care not only benefits one person but also can be disseminated worldwide.? Huge ROI.

Andrew Serio

Retired: Large Group Health Plan Professional ( 1972-2022)

6 年

Agree; but may I suggest that sellable Value - based Health Care Health Expense thru a PCP model be one based on Bundled Payments to ASCs or Clinics off the PCP's treatment plans , agreed to with patients , created by the Episode of Care to Expected Outcome; so that HR can design a Benefit Schedule around it and communicate it to Plan Participants? Focus on Outcome, instead of Price - like Business does with other purchased Commodities- will impact Inappropriate and Unnecessary Care and ultimately may lead to Tort Reform, to the benefit of all 3 Parties?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了