No Consensus For Consensus

No Consensus For Consensus

The adage that "two heads are better than one" is on the right track. In fact, research shows that consensus decisions reached by five or more people are most often qualitatively superior to individual, majority and leader decisions. Consensus decision making works - when properly used?-?because it:

  • Articulates the common will.?Consensus is reached when all participants are willing to move forward together, even if they do not agree on all the details.
  • Works from?a broader perspective. The consensus decision making group, as opposed to an individual decision-maker, has the great advantage of the experience, insights and knowledge of the many?participants.
  • Considers more options. When the group is involved, more information and considerations are processed. The group consensus decision-making process, properly led, enables sharing of expertise, creation of novel approaches and avoidance of costly mistakes. A higher quality decision typically emerges.
  • Involves those affected. Consensus decisions with broad support are more likely to be implemented. In a study of 163 business decisions, only half of the decisions were ultimately successful. The best way organizations found to reduce their failure rate was to involve those affected by the decision in the decision process.

GOOD NEWS: TWO-THIRDS SAY THEY USE CONSENSUS

Of the 305 leaders that Forrest Consulting polled in its?2016 Strategic Leader Survey, two-thirds said that consensus?decision making is among the various decision-making models and systems they use.

Notably:

  • Organizations whose leaders rate?as being "more successful" than others of their type are more likely to use consensus decision making.?Half of the organizations rated "less successful" commonly use consensus, while two-thirds of those rated "more successful" use it.
  • Consensus decision making is used by the same ratio of smaller and larger organizations (just under 60%).
  • Non-profit organizations are more likely than for-profit organization to use consensus decision making (67% versus 55%).

REALITY: THE LEADER MOST OFTEN DECIDES

However, having consensus decision making in the organization's arsenal does not necessary mean that it is regularly used to make the big decisions affecting the organization's future.

In fact, as the pie chart shows, organizations typically make strategic decisions without the leader obtaining consensus: In two-thirds of organizations the leader typically decides. The?2016 Strategic Leader Survey?report shows that in more than half of organizations the leader typically consults with individuals or groups and then makes the strategic decision. The leader typically obtains consensus for strategic decisions in only 29% of organizations.

Looking deeper, the?2016 Strategic Leader Survey?results show that:

  • Leaders of more successful organizations are somewhat more likely to use consensus, but, still, only a third of these organizations typically make strategic decision by obtaining consensus. The leader decides without consultation in a higher share of less successful organizations.
  • The leader typically obtains consensus to make strategic decisions in an even a smaller share of large organizations: The leader obtains consensus in less than a quarter of larger organizations, versus in a third of smaller?organizations.
  • Non-profit organizations show the greatest likelihood?to make strategic decisions through the leader obtaining consensus. In half of non-profits, strategic decisions are typically made through the leader obtaining consensus. In contrast, in just over 20% of for-profit organizations are strategic decisions made through the leader obtaining consensus. In nearly two-thirds of for-profits, the leader typically consults with others and then makes the decision. This is true for only a slightly over a third of non-profits.


References

“Leadership in Groups: A Monetary Policy Experiment.” Alan S. Blinder, John Morgan. NBER Working Paper No. 13391, September 2007?https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1014339

“Groups Make Better Self-Interested Decisions.” Gary Charness, Matthias Sutter. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 26, Number 3, Summer 2012, Pages 157–176.?https://econ.ucsb.edu/~charness/papers/groups.pdf

“Decision Making in Groups.” Saylor Academy. 2012.?https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_human-relations/s12-03-decision-making-in-groups.html

“Why groups perform better than individuals at quantitative judgment tasks: Group-to-individual transfer as an alternative to differential weighting.” Thomas Schultzea, Andreas Mojzischb, Stefan Schulz-Hardta. May 2012. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages 24–36.?https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597812000027

“Groups perform better than the best individuals on Letters-to-Numbers problems.” Patrick R. Laughlin, Bryan L. Bonner, Andrew G. Miner. July 2002. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 605–620.?https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597802000031

“The tragedy of the commons revisited: The importance of group decision-making.” Joris Gilleta, Arthur Schramb, Joep Sonnemans. June 2009. Journal of Public Economics, Volume 93, Issues 5–6, June 2009, Pages 785–797.?https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004727270900005X

“Group vs. Individual Performance in a Price-Searching Experiment.” Douglas D. Davis, David W. Harless. May 1996. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 215-227.?https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597896900503

“Decision accuracy in complex environments is often maximized by small group sizes.” Albert B. Kao, Iain D. Couzin. 2014. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. April 23, 2014.?https://blogs.princeton.edu/research/2014/04/23/too-many-chefs-smaller-groups-exhibit-more-accurate-decision-making-proceedings-of-the-royal-society-b/

“Decision Making.” Chapter 11 of Management Principles (v. 1.0). https://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/management-principles-v1.0/s15-decision-making.html

“Consensus decision-making.” Wikipedia.?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making

“The Basics of Consensus Decision-Making.” Tim Hartnett. Consensus Decision Making" https://www.groupfacilitation.net/Articles%20for%20Facilitators/The%20Basics%20of%20Consensus%20Decision%20Making.pdf?

“Consensus Building.” Heidi Burgess, Brad Spangler. September 2003. Beyond Intractability.?https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/consensus-building

“The Consensus Building Approach.” Lawrence Susskind. October 2012. Agorà: Idee per la Mobilità del Futuro.?https://theconsensusbuildingapproach.blogspot.com/2012/10/

Kamil Sedzimir

Supply Chain and Logistics Leader | Quality Control Manager | Advocates for Regenerative Economies | NoConsensus.World Founder

8 个月

Interesting analysis of the leadership decision-making process in terms of consensus. I’m recently interested in the concept of “no consensus” as I’m focusing on solutions based on nature for global challenges. During my research, I learned that nature operates without consensus and works quite well. There is a lot we can learn from nature to develop a lifestyle more aligned with it. By lifestyle, I mean all human activities, including business.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Lee Crumbaugh的更多文章

  • Know Who You Are Up Against!

    Know Who You Are Up Against!

    “Thank God for competition. When our competitors upset our plans or outdo our designs, they open infinite possibilities…

  • Quick Hit: Don't Confuse Luck and Skill

    Quick Hit: Don't Confuse Luck and Skill

    How should we address luck in our decision making? Let’s get clear on luck. Berkeley mathematician David Aldous’ “short…

  • Be Better Than The Competition

    Be Better Than The Competition

    It’s a tough world out there! It’s likely, whether you recognize it or not, that you are in a cutthroat marketplace…

    2 条评论
  • What To Do When Disaster Ensues

    What To Do When Disaster Ensues

    There is no way to ease the burden. The voyage leads on from harm to harm, A land of others and of silence.

  • Quick Hit: Think "Value Creation Strategies"

    Quick Hit: Think "Value Creation Strategies"

    Value is at the heart of business success. Learn what customers and other stakeholders will value, find ways to create…

  • California High Speed Rail to Nowhere: Lessons for Implementing Our Plans

    California High Speed Rail to Nowhere: Lessons for Implementing Our Plans

    A New Year has befallen us, ready or not. Hopefully, you are ready.

  • Why New Year’s Resolutions Fail: The Problem of Implementation

    Why New Year’s Resolutions Fail: The Problem of Implementation

    A few days ago, New Year’s resolutions came to mind as I was writing year-end reports to my coaching clients. A blog…

    2 条评论
  • Rise of the Poker Pros: 10 Lessons for Great Success

    Rise of the Poker Pros: 10 Lessons for Great Success

    Is life a poker game? Or, perhaps better stated, to what extent does playing poker teach us about living the best life?…

  • Are You Ready to Bat?

    Are You Ready to Bat?

    When a professional baseball player goes up to bat, they: Check how the fielders are positioned Note if runners are on…

  • STRATEGIC BUSINESS LEADER, November 2024

    STRATEGIC BUSINESS LEADER, November 2024

    A newsletter for Strategic Business Leaders from Forrest Consulting Thought of the day: "Truly great minds are willing…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了