Consciousness – what is it really?

Consciousness – what is it really?

Let me begin with the Mandukya Upanishad. I find it useful at times to start with the end, to grasp the middle, and then the whole. So for this piece I begin with the last sutra. It is said, that the essence of Vedanta is contained in the Mandukya Upanishad, which has in all just 12 verses. If this understood, all spiritual texts are understood. Hopefully, this would be worth grasping. :)

Verse 12. The fourth is soundless: unutterable, a quieting down of all relative manifestations, blissful, peaceful, non-dual. Thus, OM is the ātman, verily. He who knows thus, merges his self in the Self – yea, he who knows thus. – Mandukya Upanishad

Consciousness is the Absolute One. The One that has no second. (Advitiya or ekmevaadvitiiyn). Everything IS Consciousness (Brahman). Everything (if there is such a thing) does not exist in Consciousness: It is consciousness. It is Fullness of everything. Yet it has no ‘thing’, so it can be said to be No-thing. It is pure awareness - here now. Ever Present. Brahman is the figurative Upadana – both the principle and the cause.

Consciousness is present to all of us: we are conscious to our thoughts, we are conscious to our sensations, we are conscious to our perceptions. Yet, even more importantly we are conscious to our own Consciousness. That’s why we can say, I am aware of my thoughts, and yes I am aware of You sitting on the chair, and yes I am aware of my back resting on the seat. But what’s really incredible we can also say, I am Conscious! Consciousness is real, and for Scientist it continues to be the ‘hard problem’ – what causes its' physiology, its' phenomenon?

Consciousness is who we are! It is us every moment, if only we can see it. Verily, no experience can take place, either of thought, perception or sensation unless Consciousness is present. What is thought, perceived or sensed requires awareness. For without the awareness there would be no experience – no object, no scenery, no sensation. Again, when we say ‘seer’, the ‘seeing’ and the ‘scenery’: all of this is a substance of Consciousness. The observed is the observer itself. It is awareness being aware of itself. There is no witness and a doer: both are substance of the same Consciousness, from which all manifestations belong.

Yet, it is all that is containable, yet it is not a container. All sounds are modifications of it, but it’s true nature is soundless; all forms are awakened, yet itself it is formless. All elements are perceived of its form, yet it is not perceiving; it is in the nature of the perception itself. It has no beginning (was never created) nor will ever cease. It has no time nor space. These are illusions of the mind, which itself is an illusion, when the phenomenon is divided off from itself. Consciousness is not an entity, located in space and time. It is absent of time or space.

The atman (is but an immutable, indivisible part of the Brahman (aka consciousness). It is the substance of the Brahman. It is not born of it, it is it. I am that, is the oft repeated clarity provided in the multitudes of the Upanishad.

Again it is incorrect to say, that once this is realised, that it merges ‘self into Self’ – that is a notion of dualistic. There are no two entities. Recognising this is awakening to one’s self, sometimes referred to as Enlightenment. When you say Steve realise that you are playing the role of an ‘actor’- when you awaken to this fact, the ‘actor’ dissolves, only Steve remains. You have always been Steve, yet awareness that has always been present, has been veiled to the true nature of your being.

The actor is very much existent, but is an illusion. It is the mind that creates the ‘actor’, the perception of objects, sensations and it is the actor that has thoughts.The thinking mind is pointed, it always comes up referring to ‘something’. The thinking thought creates a ‘person’ while awareness brings awareness to presence. People when relating to a pet feels its presence, and without judgement.

So what prevents us from knowing our true self?

In yogic teaching, it is said that when there is Ignorance (Avidya) of our true nature then there are hindrances which cause us to create a divided ‘ego sense’ that is identified, attached to or has aversions to objects, sensations and perceptions, that wishes to cling to life failing to realise that the true self is immortal. It is in this, that desire is born, and with it affliction and suffering. Abiding in one’s true nature of Sat Chit Ananda, all suffering drops.

Mandukya - the balance verses

Working backwards, to the all the remaining 11 Slohkas, it can now be understood that:

Awareness exists – once (awakened state) in the world of thought, perception, and sensations, with opportunities for action.

Again, it exists in dream stage, with thought, perception and sensation, without the faculty for action, but access to the unconscious wisdom, inaccessible to us otherwise, and include memories from past lives as well.

When in deep sleep, it is pure awareness, but absence of thoughts, perceptions and sensations. It is Consciousness or awareness of absence of ‘things or matter or mental stuff’.

Each of us, has awareness of the first two, and the outcomes of the third. That’s why we say we feel refreshed after a good sleep.

The fourth stage of Turiya, is when Self realises itself.

All religions in some form or the other share the non-dualistic nature of man.


How does one live in that space?

Be grateful for the glimpses. Also to bring more present awareness to routine activities as opposed to thinking. To bring ‘spaces’ in your life. What matters most in each one’s life is Now. Time dominates the surface level of reality and includes past and future. Getting what you want, and not getting what you want – both can lead to being unsatiated.

When we identify with ‘problems’ we are bound up with the phenomena. At this moment, I may have a challenge (if a wild animal creeps up suddenly). They may be pain, even an emotion. But what is the problem now? Be always in a state of surrender.

The human ego acts as a block to realising consciousness. It goes beyond selfishness and arrogance. Ego is an identification with the streams of thinking. It is the arising of thinking, and discriminating good with bad (when Adam and Eve ate the forbidden apple). There is a ‘mind made’ entity which is made up of memories and past conditioning from which we derive our sense of who we are – a split between Me (ego) and I. It is an identification with thought forms, emotional forms, which makes us ignorant to our bigger self. As also with the other, we objectify the other and fail to become aware of the aliveness of the other, and ourselves. We project, label, judge others and ourselves, using thought forms.

Am I my story? If not, then who are you? It’s fine to recall, but one should immerse but not be immersed in the past. You ought not to be trapped in your past history. Marketers offer us ‘exclusive labels’. We are also competing for negative moods –“ you say you are having a headache, I have even worse.’ Ego wishes to be right all the time. It loves conflict with others. Its needs to emphasise self and the other.

Consciousness exists at many levels – outwardly and inwardly. As one draws inwards one gets closer to the source of light. Let me end with the Mundukya Upanishad 1.1.7: “ As a spider projects forth and draws back (its threads), as plants grow on earth, as hairs grow on the body, so does the universe emerge from the Imperishable Being.“

What does this article evoke in you? Do share your comments.

Avadhoot Dandekar

Co-Founder and CEO at Betterify

2 个月

[7] This comment is the last. And this is in response to the title of your post, everything is consciousness. No, that does not help. Consciousness is an experience. It is a subjective experience. It is subject to your own wordless existential experience. It is your testimony. It is your testament. It can not be begged or borrowed. It can not be stolen. It can not be bookish. It is non-negotiable. It is not physical. The physical is only an appearance. It is like the collapse of a wave function. It is the experience of the non-physical. Akara or the form is only an appearance. It is the Nirakara, the formless. It is the experience of the immeasurable. Atman is not physical. It is the experience of nothing. So, nothingness is consciousness. Everything is not consciousness. No-thingness is consciousness. So the reality is not physical. Reality is spiritual. Reality is non-dual. It is Advait ?? ??

回复
Avadhoot Dandekar

Co-Founder and CEO at Betterify

2 个月

[6] Similarly, AUM is fundamental to the Sanskrit language. It is the beginning and the end of the language. the three alphabets in AUM are like the vowels in English but in a sound form. You can not create a word in Sanskrit without the sound of any of these three letters (AUM or ?, ?, ?, and the sound in ?). Om is the soundless sound. It is the beginning. It is the explosion. It is the Big Bang. Before Om, there was silence and after the Om, there is that silence. The no-mind state is that end. The silence of the mind is that end. Realization of the Atman is that end. The monk's mind is that end. The Mandukya Upanishad talks about these four states of consciousness. It is a kind of inner relativity. You go through these four states of consciousness to validate your true experience. The first three are all parts of a differentiated and identified consciousness. You identify yourself with waking, dreaming, and dreamless consciousness. And in the fourth, your identification is broken. Your mechanical nature is broken. You become free of your past. You become free of mind. You become one with the eternal. The Atman becomes the Brahman. You were unaware in the beginning. Now you are aware and awake ?? ??

回复
Avadhoot Dandekar

Co-Founder and CEO at Betterify

2 个月

[5] All my 4 comments to your post are just a background. Now I am coming to the Mandukya Upanishad. The Mandukya Upanishad is the smallest of all Upanishads. It has only 12 verses. Even if we spend one month for one verse we can finish and understand it within a year. This Upanishad divides our Consciousness into four states. (1) The waking body, the waking mind, and waking consciousness, (2) The dreaming body, dreaming mind, and dreaming consciousness, (3) The dreamless body, dreamless mind, and dreamless consciousness, (4) The awakened body, awakened mind, and awakened consciousness. This is that fourth, the Turiya. The Upanishad equates these four states of consciousness with OM, AUM, ?. Truth is not a word. But words are used to convey the truth. Words are impotent. Truth is potent. Words are finite. Truth is infinite. Words are insufficient and incapable of expressing the existential truth. Hence it has to become one's own wordless existential experience. We have to understand this syllable AUM. It is the starting point of the Sanskrit language. In Sanskrit, the sound comes first and the letters, words, and sentences come later. In English, the letters come first. You can not construct a word without the vowels, AEIOU ??

回复
Avadhoot Dandekar

Co-Founder and CEO at Betterify

2 个月

[4] The Guru is there just as a presence to unleash the Guru within you. Your true Self or Atman is going to be your inquiry and discovery. He is just there as a presence, a catalyst, and a change agent. According to the Guru Gita (another Gita written by Shiva himself), your Atman is the true Guru. The outside Guru is there to invoke the Guru within you. Now you are not dependent. Now you are independent and self-sufficient. In this moment of experiencing your Atman (undivided and undifferentiated consciousness), you become one with the Brahman (Supreme Consciousness). Symbolically and metaphorically it is like the drop and the ocean. It is like the wave and ocean. The separation was just an appearance because of the mind. The mind is a prism of duality. Mind is Maya. Mind is like a mirage. The mind is like a monkey. The mind is like the collapse of a wave function. The mind creates decoherence and breaks the non-dual reality. Mindfulness or meditation transforms the monkey mind into a monk mind. The monk is only a metaphor. Do not visualize someone who is wearing the clothes of a monk. The monk who sold his Ferrari and went to the Himalayas is a holy shit. It has to be an inner transformation and a total transformation ?? ??

回复
Avadhoot Dandekar

Co-Founder and CEO at Betterify

2 个月

[3] Vedanta means the end of knowledge. Knowledge and knowing are two different things. The end of knowledge is the beginning of the knowing. The information is not the knowledge. And the knowledge is not the wisdom. The present knowledge is more valuable than the past knowledge. The future knowledge is going to be more valuable than the present knowledge. The knowledge can be like the time value of money. Knowledge is in time. And wisdom is beyond time. The wisdom is eternal. In the Upanishadic parlance, it is Sanatan. It is not satanic, it is Sanatan. The knowledge of the East (India or Bharat in particular) is divided into Para and Apara knowledge. It is divided into Gyan and Vigyan. Gyan is Para knowledge (beyond cognition, beyond mind, and beyond time). Vigyan is Apara knowledge (in cognition, in the time, and mind). In the understanding of the East, Science is an Apara Knowledge, and Spirituality is a Para Knowledge. Agyan is not knowing any of the two. Science is experimental and spirituality is experiential. What is the meaning of Upanishad? The literal meaning of Upanishad is sitting with the Guru. Why? To experience this wordless experience. Can the Guru give you this experience? How can he? It is non-negotiable ??

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了