Connecting the Dots: Multi-chain Communication Goes Beyond Bridges in the Next Generation

Are you ready to learn how different blockchains can now communicate with each other, creating a more connected and efficient network? Sit back and get ready for an epic adventure into the world of cross-chain and multi-chain communication and the next generation of blockchain interoperability!

The latest developments in the blockchain world involve crosschain and multichain communication. These two concepts differ in their infrastructure, operations, and limitations.

Cross-chains are public networks that provide open access to their ledger systems. They offer interoperability where participants can transact with each other regardless of which blockchain they belong to. Cross-chains enable assets and data to be exchanged across multiple ledgers while offering increased security due to their distributed infrastructure. However, cross-chain transactions often require more energy and computing power than single-chain ones since it involves multiple networks communicating with each other simultaneously.

Multi-chains, on the other hand, are private, permissioned networks that require users to obtain permission from specific gateways before accessing data stored in a different chain. Interoperability between multi-chain networks is also limited unless specified nodes agree upon certain rules beforehand. Multi-chain allows for greater decentralization compared to centralized solutions but comes with limitations such as fewer nodes participating in consensus processes as well as higher costs associated with running multiple ledger systems in tandem.?

Why is achieving interoperability between different layer-1 networks so crucial for blockchain technology??

Achieving interoperability between different layer-1 networks is critical to realizing the full potential of blockchain solutions and accelerating global adoption. Without interoperability, blockchain networks become more fragmented, limiting the reach and functionality of DApps and reducing liquidity. In addition, the lack of interoperability can limit the scalability of blockchain networks, leading to slow transaction times and high fees.?

One example of this is the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. Many DeFi applications are built on the Ethereum blockchain, which has experienced congestion during periods of high demand, resulting in slow transaction times and high gas fees. This has led to frustration among users and has limited the growth of DeFi as a whole. However, with the emergence of cross-chain solutions and interoperability protocols like Polkadot and Cosmos, developers can build decentralized applications that can communicate with multiple blockchain networks, improving scalability and reducing fees.?

Is interoperability possible in both Cross Chains and Multi-Chains?

Cross-chain networks are built with the aim of enabling the transfer of data and assets between different ledgers, making them ideal for achieving interoperability. On the other hand, multi-chain networks can also support interoperability, but their permissioned nature can restrict the range of services that can be offered.

What is the main limitation of current cross-chain solutions, such as bridges??

The most popular cross-chain solutions, like bridges, have been constantly attacked by hackers and other malicious actors exploiting loopholes in this new infrastructure. In fact, about 50% of all blockchain exploits in decentralized finance (DeFi) were related to bridges in 2022, according to Token Terminal data. This vulnerability makes bridges less than ideal for achieving interoperability.?

One of the most common limitations is that once assets have been moved to a new network using a bridge, there needs to be sufficient liquidity for the functions that users want to perform, such as borrowing, lending or swapping. Additionally, users need to have some of the network’s native token in order to interact with platforms on the new network.

What is the solution to achieving layer-1 interoperability without compromising security??

Developers are prioritizing security in their search for a better alternative to bridges. The Ferrum Network is one such project that can achieve layer-1 interoperability without compromising security. Its mainnet is being built using Substrate, an open-source software development kit (SDK) that was also employed by Polkadot. Ferrum also has a multichain messaging engine known as Quantum Portal, which enables smart contracts to be deployed on multiple chains to conduct multichain transactions or queries.?

What are some potential use cases for the Ferrum Network's multichain messaging engine??

The Ferrum Network's Quantum Portal opens the door to multiple use cases, including interoperable metaverses, multichain staking, multichain smart contracts and tokens, multichain DeFi, and a multichain wallet. With the ability to balance liquidity across networks, Ferrum Network is working to bring interoperability to every chain in the industry.?

For more information about Ferrum Network's multichain messaging engine, watch this video.

Are there any other considerations when choosing between Cross Chains and Multi-Chains?

In my point of view, I have found that scalability, cost efficiency, security, performance, and ease of development are important factors to consider when selecting a technology. It is also essential to evaluate whether the project requires a permissioned or permissionless network.

Multi-chain networks can offer increased security benefits due to their permissioned nature, but they may limit interoperability. On the other hand, cross chain networks are better suited to applications that require high throughput and low latency, making them a good choice for applications that require a high level of interoperability.

Both cross-chain and multi-chain networks have their unique advantages and limitations. While cross-chains offer greater interoperability and scalability, multi-chains offer more privacy and security. The decision on which technology to use ultimately depends on the specific requirements of each project. As the blockchain industry continues to evolve, it's important for developers to stay updated on the latest developments in multichain communication and interoperability. Organizations must also carefully evaluate their project requirements before selecting a blockchain technology. They should weigh the benefits and limitations of each type of network and choose the technology that best suits their needs.

In conclusion, achieving interoperability between different layer-1 networks is crucial for the growth and adoption of blockchain solutions. With current cross-chain solutions proving to be vulnerable to hacking attacks, it's important to prioritize security in the search for better alternatives. Projects like Ferrum Network are leading the way in multichain communication, opening the door to new use cases and expanding the potential of blockchain solutions.

Are you ready to join the movement towards a bridgeless future in the blockchain industry?

Because, I am ready!

_________________________________________________________

"Women Who Work with Whales: Insider Stories in Crypto Startups" is a captivating book that provides a unique perspective on the world of cryptocurrency startups from the vantage point of women who have made significant contributions to the field.

The book provides an in-depth look at the challenges faced by women in the male-dominated world of crypto startups, and how these women have overcome those obstacles to make a significant impact on the industry. It covers a wide range of topics, including the culture of the crypto industry, crypto startups and social change, the role of women in shaping the future of crypto and etc.

A must-read for working professionals who wish to learn more about Web3.

Preview to my bool: https://lnkd.in/ggdhM7B6

??If you want to book a virtual call with me,?click here.

Don't forget to leave a comment below to extend this conversation.