Connected Devices – Driving Customer Adoption
Harald Horgen
Revenue transformation for software companies and OEM/machine builders. Build an action plan and focus your team on your next-generation business model. LinkedIn member #25856
We have seen a surge in IIoT applications and solutions, but unfortunately, we are going through a period of asynchronous adoption – there is a significant lag between the innovations that are being created and adoption by end users:
1.??????In first place on the adoption curve are the hyperscalers (Microsoft, AWS, Google) that want to shape the world to do everything in the Cloud.?A big part of their strategy is to create new software companies with born-in-the-Cloud solutions.?This includes start-ups and non-traditional prospects, e.g., manufacturers that are building IIoT solutions;
2.??????This is creating a large number of new solutions that are developed and delivered through the Cloud;
3.??????In third place we have the end user customers – there are more Cloud-based solutions than there are customers that want to buy them.
The challenge for manufacturers is to find ways to convince their customers to adopt these wonderful new solutions and shorten the lag in this asynchronous adoption.?The longer you have to absorb the investment in connected devices and related software without a return, the more difficult it becomes for management and the board to maintain their commitment to going digital.?
We went through this cycle 5-7 years ago, when a lot of companies developed connected products and remote monitoring/preventive maintenance applications, and they hit the wall in terms of customer adoption.?Now many of them are back, and they are still experiencing some of the same objections and concerns:
Every manufacturer will have small number of customers that are ready to pull the trigger on a comprehensive transformation project, but they are the outliers.?For the more reluctant customers, there are a number of strategies to maximize the rate of adoption.
Start with existing historical machine data
Most of your customers have generated enormous amounts of data from SCADA, PLCs and historians.?Significant value can be extracted by analyzing the machine-specific data to forecast servicing requirements and the remaining life.?This approach overcomes one of the most common objections – “We don’t want to send our data to the Cloud.”?Once customers see the value of applying analytics to their historical data, they are more likely to accept that even greater benefits can be provided by connecting their devices and getting recommendations in real-time.
Include connectivity in all devices shipped
It is essential to create a user base – the more connected devices you have installed with your customers, the more data you can ultimately generate and analyze.
The big question for many of our customers has been whether they should simply include the connectivity and absorb the cost, or offer it is an option at a higher price to cover the cost of building in the connectivity.?I think this comes down to some key questions:
For many manufacturers our recommendation is to bite the bullet, build connectivity into the devices and ship them at no cost to your customers.?At some point adoption will hit an inflection point,?and you will be much better positioned if you can simply connect and activate the devices when the time comes.
Have a strategy for retrofitting older devices
Many physical assets have a useful life of 20-30 years, which means that any connected devices that your customer installs will only be a small percentage of the total, unless they are going through an end-to-end transformation that involves ripping and replacing everything. ?How often is that going to happen?
领英推荐
This can result in the following objections:
You should be prepared to have a strategy for retrofitting and connecting your older devices.?Position the first phase of pre-connected devices as a pilot to show the ROI they can get, and then roll out a program to extend connectivity to the older devices.?
Strategy for connecting competitors’ devices
As customers start to see the benefits generated by connected devices, they will want all similar devices connected and monitored.?And it doesn’t really make sense to have different dashboards from three competing vendors – it is already hard enough to train their people to use one system, let alone three.?Eventually, many companies will want to consolidate the monitoring so that they have a single dashboard.
The question you have to ask yourself is, “What happens if they consolidate the monitoring with one of your competitors?” ?Among other things:
This is the epitome of “eat or be eaten”.?Once you have been locked out of gaining access to data from your devices, you risk being locked out forever, and you will become marginalized as a vendor of commodity hardware at the lowest possible price.
Have clearly defined terms for data ownership
Customers are starting to become more sophisticated about the value of data, and you will need to have agreements to cover the four main categories of customers:
1.??????Do not understand the value of data, and sign your license agreement without question, in the same way that I sign user agreements with Apple and Google.?Your license agreement would give you the right to use their data on an anonymized basis;
2.??????Will never allow their data to leave their premises;
3.??????Will allow you to use their data, but only for their direct benefit, e.g., improving the software for them, using the data to make recommendations, etc.;
4.??????Understand the value of data, and will allow you to monetize their anonymized data in return for some form of monetization, e.g., sharing in royalties generated from the use of their data.
You will need different provisions for each category of customer, but being able to present your customer with well-explained options increases the likelihood of adoption.
Empowering the Largest Companies on the Planet to Innovate.
1 年Interesting Points. I think it's important for the machine builder to motivate the end user to the reason why it's important. I suppose the cost of the machine makes a difference too. The use case for a connected $200 vibration sensor vs a $500K machine is probably different.
Connected Services Enabler | Helping OEMs and Service Providers implement and deliver their Connected Services through our SaaS | Servitly Co-founder & CEO
2 年Great insight, thank you Harald! Your point 4 made me reflect. "connecting competitors’ devices", is it really worth it? We know that the value is not just visualizing data in dashboards, but processing it and extracting valuable and actionable information. This process requires to perfeclty know the meaning of data. If you are not the manufacturer of the device it will be very hard to know it (this is by intent, other manufacturer want to protect their intellectural property). So if you even succed in conneting a competitors' device into your Cloud, probably you cannot extract very useful value from such data. This in the end will result in a "poor" value perceived by the end customer. What do you think about?
AI Enablement, Data Strategy, Process Automation
2 年Thank for sharing Harald. An insightful article. I am perplexed when I see organizations that go through the trouble of implementing an entire IoT stack, some even collect the data in the cloud, but at the end of the day the data just sits there and they dont do anything with it
Industry 4.0 & Digital Transformation Enthusiast | Business Strategist | Avid Storyteller | Tech Geek | Public Speaker
2 年Great info! You should come up with names for each stage in terms of what it looks like for manufacturers. For example, what would we call the early adopters and what are they doing?
Partner Sales Executive, Digital Transformer, ex-Marathon runner and lifelong Blues Aficionado
2 年A lot to unpack here! I would add that edge processing is possible, not all data has to be sent and processed in the Cloud.