Connected Devices – Driving Customer Adoption

Connected Devices – Driving Customer Adoption

We have seen a surge in IIoT applications and solutions, but unfortunately, we are going through a period of asynchronous adoption – there is a significant lag between the innovations that are being created and adoption by end users:

1.??????In first place on the adoption curve are the hyperscalers (Microsoft, AWS, Google) that want to shape the world to do everything in the Cloud.?A big part of their strategy is to create new software companies with born-in-the-Cloud solutions.?This includes start-ups and non-traditional prospects, e.g., manufacturers that are building IIoT solutions;

2.??????This is creating a large number of new solutions that are developed and delivered through the Cloud;

3.??????In third place we have the end user customers – there are more Cloud-based solutions than there are customers that want to buy them.

The challenge for manufacturers is to find ways to convince their customers to adopt these wonderful new solutions and shorten the lag in this asynchronous adoption.?The longer you have to absorb the investment in connected devices and related software without a return, the more difficult it becomes for management and the board to maintain their commitment to going digital.?

We went through this cycle 5-7 years ago, when a lot of companies developed connected products and remote monitoring/preventive maintenance applications, and they hit the wall in terms of customer adoption.?Now many of them are back, and they are still experiencing some of the same objections and concerns:

  • The cost of buying and installing connected devices;
  • Impact on the organization – how much do they need to transform?
  • Hybrid, multi-vendor production environments?;
  • Showing a clear ROI;
  • Getting access to the data.

Every manufacturer will have small number of customers that are ready to pull the trigger on a comprehensive transformation project, but they are the outliers.?For the more reluctant customers, there are a number of strategies to maximize the rate of adoption.


Start with existing historical machine data

Most of your customers have generated enormous amounts of data from SCADA, PLCs and historians.?Significant value can be extracted by analyzing the machine-specific data to forecast servicing requirements and the remaining life.?This approach overcomes one of the most common objections – “We don’t want to send our data to the Cloud.”?Once customers see the value of applying analytics to their historical data, they are more likely to accept that even greater benefits can be provided by connecting their devices and getting recommendations in real-time.


Include connectivity in all devices shipped

It is essential to create a user base – the more connected devices you have installed with your customers, the more data you can ultimately generate and analyze.

The big question for many of our customers has been whether they should simply include the connectivity and absorb the cost, or offer it is an option at a higher price to cover the cost of building in the connectivity.?I think this comes down to some key questions:

  • Are you committed to connected devices as a long-term strategy??The more strategic it is, the more you should be willing to invest in creating a user base;
  • What is the cost of the connectivity relative to the value of the asset being monitored??
  • What is the cost of building in the connectivity versus having to retrofit it later?
  • Is the asset, regardless of cost, critical to a larger process?

For many manufacturers our recommendation is to bite the bullet, build connectivity into the devices and ship them at no cost to your customers.?At some point adoption will hit an inflection point,?and you will be much better positioned if you can simply connect and activate the devices when the time comes.


Have a strategy for retrofitting older devices

Many physical assets have a useful life of 20-30 years, which means that any connected devices that your customer installs will only be a small percentage of the total, unless they are going through an end-to-end transformation that involves ripping and replacing everything. ?How often is that going to happen?

This can result in the following objections:

  • What is the value of only monitoring a small number of devices?
  • We don’t want to change our standard operating processes in order to monitor a few devices.

You should be prepared to have a strategy for retrofitting and connecting your older devices.?Position the first phase of pre-connected devices as a pilot to show the ROI they can get, and then roll out a program to extend connectivity to the older devices.?


Strategy for connecting competitors’ devices

As customers start to see the benefits generated by connected devices, they will want all similar devices connected and monitored.?And it doesn’t really make sense to have different dashboards from three competing vendors – it is already hard enough to train their people to use one system, let alone three.?Eventually, many companies will want to consolidate the monitoring so that they have a single dashboard.

The question you have to ask yourself is, “What happens if they consolidate the monitoring with one of your competitors?” ?Among other things:

  • Your competitors will generate a revenue stream from monitoring your equipment;
  • They will be perceived to be the “smart device vendor”, making it more likely that customers will purchase their equipment in the next replacement cycle;
  • They will have access to performance data from your equipment, giving them insights they can use to improve their own devices.

This is the epitome of “eat or be eaten”.?Once you have been locked out of gaining access to data from your devices, you risk being locked out forever, and you will become marginalized as a vendor of commodity hardware at the lowest possible price.


Have clearly defined terms for data ownership

Customers are starting to become more sophisticated about the value of data, and you will need to have agreements to cover the four main categories of customers:

1.??????Do not understand the value of data, and sign your license agreement without question, in the same way that I sign user agreements with Apple and Google.?Your license agreement would give you the right to use their data on an anonymized basis;

2.??????Will never allow their data to leave their premises;

3.??????Will allow you to use their data, but only for their direct benefit, e.g., improving the software for them, using the data to make recommendations, etc.;

4.??????Understand the value of data, and will allow you to monetize their anonymized data in return for some form of monetization, e.g., sharing in royalties generated from the use of their data.

You will need different provisions for each category of customer, but being able to present your customer with well-explained options increases the likelihood of adoption.


#industry40 #smartmanufacturing #IIoT

Omar Aziz Ahmed

Empowering the Largest Companies on the Planet to Innovate.

1 年

Interesting Points. I think it's important for the machine builder to motivate the end user to the reason why it's important. I suppose the cost of the machine makes a difference too. The use case for a connected $200 vibration sensor vs a $500K machine is probably different.

Stefano Butti

Connected Services Enabler | Helping OEMs and Service Providers implement and deliver their Connected Services through our SaaS | Servitly Co-founder & CEO

2 年

Great insight, thank you Harald! Your point 4 made me reflect. "connecting competitors’ devices", is it really worth it? We know that the value is not just visualizing data in dashboards, but processing it and extracting valuable and actionable information. This process requires to perfeclty know the meaning of data. If you are not the manufacturer of the device it will be very hard to know it (this is by intent, other manufacturer want to protect their intellectural property). So if you even succed in conneting a competitors' device into your Cloud, probably you cannot extract very useful value from such data. This in the end will result in a "poor" value perceived by the end customer. What do you think about?

Rudy Agovic, PhD

AI Enablement, Data Strategy, Process Automation

2 年

Thank for sharing Harald. An insightful article. I am perplexed when I see organizations that go through the trouble of implementing an entire IoT stack, some even collect the data in the cloud, but at the end of the day the data just sits there and they dont do anything with it

Jeff Winter

Industry 4.0 & Digital Transformation Enthusiast | Business Strategist | Avid Storyteller | Tech Geek | Public Speaker

2 年

Great info! You should come up with names for each stage in terms of what it looks like for manufacturers. For example, what would we call the early adopters and what are they doing?

Denis Foucher

Partner Sales Executive, Digital Transformer, ex-Marathon runner and lifelong Blues Aficionado

2 年

A lot to unpack here! I would add that edge processing is possible, not all data has to be sent and processed in the Cloud.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Harald Horgen的更多文章

  • Stop the Blob!

    Stop the Blob!

    The Channel "Blob" is Killing Channel Partners and Your Business by Harald Horgen and Thomas B. Cross Most channel…

    10 条评论
  • Going Global - Remember ABBA

    Going Global - Remember ABBA

    Many emerging technology companies rush headlong into U.S.

    12 条评论
  • Why Don't Resellers Sell?

    Why Don't Resellers Sell?

    Properly structured and supported, indirect channels are often the fastest, most cost-effective way for a company to…

    6 条评论
  • Industry 4.0 might be too smart for its own good

    Industry 4.0 might be too smart for its own good

    Industry 4.0 was introduced as a concept 12 years ago, and based on most surveys and research (#IoTanalytics…

    42 条评论
  • Industry 4.0 - Monetizing Data

    Industry 4.0 - Monetizing Data

    Many manufacturers are not considering a connected devices strategy because they don't want to become a software…

    24 条评论
  • Connected Products - Is this the right strategy for you?

    Connected Products - Is this the right strategy for you?

    I am going to make a distinction between 1) connected products for internal use – manufacturers that incorporate…

    19 条评论
  • Connected Product Strategy

    Connected Product Strategy

    It is fascinating to see the spirited debate on LinkedIn around Industry 4.0 and connected products.

    10 条评论
  • Is Data the New (Snake) Oil?

    Is Data the New (Snake) Oil?

    I am a big advocate of Industry 4.0, more specifically manufacturers connecting their devices, collecting data and…

    15 条评论
  • Is Industry 4.0 the Kiss of Death?

    Is Industry 4.0 the Kiss of Death?

    For the past seven years I have worked with dozens and dozens of billion dollar plus manufacturers in the U.S.

    75 条评论
  • What is the right margin for software resellers?

    What is the right margin for software resellers?

    Setting the right margins or discounts for partners is one of the questions we get most often. Pay them too much, and…

    8 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了