A conflict of interest - Privacy vs. Privilege

A conflict of interest - Privacy vs. Privilege

A little over a month ago I read an exceptionally well researched paper(1) on the tension between the CISO and their general counsel, and how that tension undermines cybersecurity.

The paper illustrates what happens when a cyber incident occurs, and how legal take over to ensure that the findings are covered by privilege, thereby limiting what may be available to plaintiffs at a later stage through discovery. This opacity in the ensuing investigation means that CISOs will not get the information they need to adequately and expeditiously mitigate against similar incidents.

The paper helped me crystallize a concern which I have been nursing for quite a bit of time regarding privacy officers and their reporting lines.

More often than not, an organizations chief privacy officer (CPO) as well as their data protection officer (DPO) report into legal. In many instances, they are corporate lawyers themselves, sitting in the legal department.

One of the primary duties of counsel is to protect the organization from fines and litigation, so does that undermine the DPOs responsibility towards data subjects and could it be viewed as a conflict of interest under the GDPR?

On February 9th, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled(2) on an Article 38(3) case. The court stated that DPOs should “be in a position to perform their duties and tasks in an independent manner”.

Fundamentally, a data protection officer reporting into general counsel may find themselves in an impossible position were protecting the privacy of their data subjects is a career limiting move as the person to whom they report is incentivized on limited of fines and litigation.

Would it be adequate if organizations established strong policies and procedures to handle conflicts and minimize their potential impact? That is yet to be seen.

In the meantime, organizations should put more effort into separation of duties as well as reporting lines to ensure that DPOs are able to “perform their duties and tasks in an independent manner”.


For more Gartner blog posts from Nader Henein, click here

For more Gartner blog posts on privacy, click here


1 How privilege undermines cybersecurity by Daniel Schwarcz, Josephine Wolff, and Daniel W Woods

2 Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 38(3) – Data protection officer – Prohibition on dismissing data protection officer for performing his or her tasks – Requirement for functional independence

3 Article 38, Position of the data protection officer

Rie Aleksandra Walle ????????

Decode CJEU, EDPB & DPA news | International speaker | Grumpy GDPR podcast | DPO Hub & NoTies Community | Not daily on LinkedIn & no app, email if urgent

6 天前

You were spot on regarding "career limiting move" Nader, the ???? DPA raised exactly this in the record NOK 4m DPO fine case (initally flagged as 99m!): https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/riealeksandra_norway-dpa-telenor-asa-dpo-fine-official-activity-7307421594790850561-i8lF All in all, they "strongly doubted" an in-house associate lawyer could also act as DPO.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Nader Henein的更多文章

  • Concerned about AI Risk? – Check for this clause in your contracts

    Concerned about AI Risk? – Check for this clause in your contracts

    We covered this in “Demystifying AI Risks”, but it bears repeating, AI is not a monolith, it is many different things…

    1 条评论
  • US Regulatory Fragmentation, first Privacy, now AI

    US Regulatory Fragmentation, first Privacy, now AI

    Say what you want about the EU’s data regulation regime but between the GDPR and the AI Act, organizations have one set…

    5 条评论
  • Demystifying AI Risks

    Demystifying AI Risks

    Since the good people at OpenAI launched ChatGPT, AI has been the juggernaut of the tech industry. This has resulted in…

    1 条评论
  • Hot Take - AI isn't coming for your job … it’s just taking its old job back.

    Hot Take - AI isn't coming for your job … it’s just taking its old job back.

    There has been a fair bit of AI anxiety in the workplace, most concerns are premature, some involve tinfoil hats and…

    1 条评论
  • US Privacy Laws - None of these things is like the other

    US Privacy Laws - None of these things is like the other

    Each year, I spend a significant amount of time tracking US privacy bills as they make their way through various state…

  • The AI Act Needs a Shared Responsibility Model and Here’s Why

    The AI Act Needs a Shared Responsibility Model and Here’s Why

    I am an ardent believer that regulators need to protect consumers while fostering innovation. As such, I have been on…

    1 条评论
  • The GDPR commeth ... Two trends you need to know

    The GDPR commeth ... Two trends you need to know

    I shouldn’t have to introduce the GDPR to anyone, but just in case, the GDPR, or the General Data Protection Regulation…

    4 条评论
  • Kicking The Ball - Startup 101

    Kicking The Ball - Startup 101

    On May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy announced before a special joint session of Congress the ambitious goal of…

  • The patient's dead but we saved the leg

    The patient's dead but we saved the leg

    The Hippocratic Oath dates back to the 5th century BC and it mandates that physicians will "do no harm". This means…

    2 条评论
  • The Oldest Profession

    The Oldest Profession

    When people talk about the ‘oldest profession’, they usually mean prostitution. I think that's just misogyny—as if…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了