A Concise Guide to ESAW Methodology for Recording Workplace Accidents
Recording and reporting workplace accidents accurately and promptly are essential elements of a robust occupational health and safety management system. This process goes beyond legal compliance, serving as a cornerstone for protecting employee well-being, fostering a proactive safety culture, and driving ongoing improvement across the organization.
What is ESAW
The European Statistics on Accidents at Work (ESAW) project, initiated in 1990, stems from the Framework Directive 89/391/EEC, which establishes guidelines to improve health and safety of employees. This directive obligates employers to maintain records of workplace accidents that lead to employee incapacity and to generate reports on these incidents, in line with national laws and practices.
ESAW is an effort to standardize workplace accident data across Europe. This harmonized approach enables a thorough analysis of occupational health and safety performance by providing consistent, comparable data across countries. By establishing a uniform methodology for recording and reporting accidents at work, ESAW facilitates the collection of high-quality data that supports informed decision-making and the development of tailored occupational health and safety interventions.
How the ESAW Methodology Standardizes Accident Records
The ESAW methodology provides a structured framework for recording and classifying workplace accidents, ensuring that data is consistent and comparable across organizations and nations.
Common Definitions
ESAW defines essential terms and concepts, clarifying what qualifies as a workplace accident. By establishing uniform definitions, ESAW minimizes ambiguity in data interpretation, leading to more accurate reporting and analysis.
Standardized Classifications
ESAW introduces standardized classifications for various aspects of accidents, including the events and materials involved, types and severity of injuries, and other relevant factors. These classifications support consistent categorization, making it possible to conduct meaningful analyses and report findings effectively at both national and European levels.
Reporting Criteria
The methodology outlines specific criteria for reporting workplace accidents, guiding organizations in collecting essential information in a consistent and standardized format.
Key Concepts in ESAW Methodology
Definition of a Workplace Accident
To standardize the recording and reporting of workplace accidents, ESAW provides a clear definition: an accident at work is defined as “a discrete occurrence in the course of work which leads to physical or mental harm.” This definition serves as the foundation for consistent data collection across organizations and jurisdictions.
Types of Injuries Included in ESAW Reporting
Included Cases:
Excluded Cases:
Key Variables for Describing an Accident
To ensure thorough and consistent accident records, ESAW defines specific variables to describe essential details about the accident:
Location, Victim, and Time:
Consequences:
Circumstances and Causes:
Recording and Reporting of Accident Data
Accurate and comprehensive recording of accident data is crucial for maintaining a safe work environment. The variables outlined in the ESAW methodology provide essential insights into the accident, the injured person, and the employer, enabling meaningful analysis and preventive measures.
Type of Injury
The "Type of Injury" code describes the physical consequences of the injury sustained by the individual. When multiple injuries occur, the code for the most severe injury should generally be used. However, if injuries of equal severity are present, the code "Multiple Injuries (120)" is selected to reflect this.
The main categories of injury types include:
Part of Body Injured
This variable identifies the specific body part affected by the injury. Only one code is selected to represent the injured body part, even in cases involving multiple injuries. If several body parts are affected, the code should reflect the most severe injury (e.g., an amputation would take precedence over a fracture). For injuries affecting larger areas, such as burns, the code “Multiple sites of the body affected (78)” is recommended to accurately represent the extent of the injury.
Recording the specific body part injured in workplace accidents is crucial for identifying patterns and assessing risk exposure, as certain tasks or environments may pose a higher threat to specific body parts. This detailed information enables organizations to pinpoint where injuries frequently occur, helping them tailor interventions to protect vulnerable areas. For instance, if hand injuries are consistently reported, this might indicate the need for improved hand protection, such as gloves with better grip or cut-resistant materials, or increased safety measures in tasks involving machinery or sharp tools.
Days Lost (Severity)
The severity of a workplace accident is measured by the total number of full calendar days during which the injured person is unable to work. Only full days where no work was performed are counted, with the day of the accident itself excluded. This calculation includes weekends, public holidays, and other days that the injured individual would typically not work, whether they are part-time or full-time employees.
Accurately recording lost days is essential not only for meeting regulatory requirements but also for calculating key performance indicators such as accident severity rates. These metrics provide insights into the impact of accidents on the workforce and help organizations assess the effectiveness of their safety measures.
ESAW also uses specific codes to indicate permanent incapacity and fatal accidents. In these cases, only the days lost prior to the diagnosis of permanent incapacity or death are included in the lost days calculation.
Workstation
The "Workstation" variable identifies the specific setting where the injured person was performing their task at the time of the accident. It distinguishes between a usual workstation, where the individual typically works, and an occasional or mobile workstation, where the employee may work less frequently. This information is valuable for understanding the context of the accident, as the nature of the workstation often influences the risk factors and conditions associated with the event.
Working Environment
The "Working Environment" variable describes the specific workplace, work premises, or general environment where an accident took place. Each code corresponds to a distinct work setting, allowing for accurate categorization and analysis of accidents based on the environment in which they occur.
Differentiating between environments is key. For example, while a classroom in a school and a training room in a factory may have similar purposes, they fall under distinct environment codes. Similarly, tasks performed at a shipyard versus on a ship at sea require separate codes due to the unique conditions of each setting.
When coding the work environment, focus on the physical setting rather than the specific activity being performed, with the exception of construction sites. For instance:
Additionally, shared spaces - like entrances, corridors, staircases, and extensions - are considered integral parts of the same environment. For example, a hospital corridor is coded as "Health establishment, private hospital, hospital, nursing home (051)," while a factory stairwell remains part of the "Production area, factory, workshop (011)" environment.
领英推荐
Working Process
The "Working Process" variable categorizes the general activity or task the injured person was performing at the time of the accident. This variable reflects the broader work process, rather than the specific action being performed in the accident’s moment.
For example, if an employee is injured while walking to the cafeteria during a lunch break, this activity would be coded as “Movement (61)”. Conversely, if a cleaner sprains their wrist while moving between offices, the working process would be coded as “Cleaning working areas (53)”.
Construction work often falls under the broader category of "Excavation, construction, repair, demolition (20)," but individual activities are coded based on their nature:
Specific Physical Activity
The "Specific Physical Activity" variable identifies the precise action the injured person was performing at the moment of the accident. This activity is distinct from both the broader working process and the person's occupation, focusing instead on the intentional action immediately preceding the accident.
To clarify, let’s revisit two examples:
However, if the same worker was injured while cleaning with a hand tool, the specific activity would fall under "Working with hand-held tools (20)."
When tools or materials are used outside of their intended purpose, this distinction should be reflected in the coding. For example, if a flat chisel is used in different ways, each scenario would have its own code:
Similarly, consider the different codes for tasks involved in changing a vehicle tire:
By using these specific activity codes, organizations can capture a detailed picture of the accident circumstances, supporting accurate data collection and meaningful accident analysis.
Deviation
"Deviation" refers to the unexpected event or series of events that disrupt the normal course of an activity, ultimately causing an accident. In cases where multiple events lead to an injury, only the last deviation (the one closest to the actual contact causing injury) is recorded.
For example, consider a laboratory technician handling a glass bottle of corrosive solution:
In this scenario, there are three deviations: “Loss of control (total or partial) (42)”, “Breakage, bursting - causing splinters (32)”, and “Liquid state – leaking, oozing, flowing, splashing, spraying (22)”. However, the last deviation is recorded, as it is closest to the injury-causing event.
The ESAW methodology organizes deviation codes to reflect the type and sequence of events leading to accidents:
Examples of Deviation Codes:
Contact and Mode of Injury
The "Contact and Mode of Injury" code describes how the injured person sustained the injury, specifically identifying the mode of contact with the object or substance causing harm. Examples include striking a surface, making contact with a sharp object, or being exposed to hazardous substances. To ensure precision, only the event that led to the most severe injury should be recorded.
The ESAW methodology categorizes these injury contacts within specific code ranges:
Examples of Contact and Mode of Injury Codes:
Material Agent
"Material agents" refer to the objects, tools, or equipment associated with the specific activity, deviation, or mode of injury. These agents play a critical role in identifying the elements involved in the accident, providing valuable context for analysis and preventive action.
Types of Material Agents:
All three types of material agents are recorded from the same list. In some cases, the same agent may apply to all categories, while in others, they may differ or be absent altogether.
Material Agent Code Groups:
Codes 01 to 03 are primarily used when the injured person falls on or collides with a surface.
Codes 04 to 11 are applicable for accidents involving machinery or tools, including those caused by equipment malfunctions.?
Codes 12 and 13 apply to transportation vehicles; however, civil engineering and agricultural devices are coded under codes 09.
Example Codings
Example 1: On a construction site, an employee carrying a tool up a stair steps on a nail sticking out of a piece of wood left on the ground.
Example 2: In a hospital, a nurse accidentally pricks their thumb on another needle while discarding a syringe in the waste bin.
Example 3: In an office, an employee falls to the floor when a hook on a portable ladder breaks while they are changing a ceiling light.