Concentrating Political Power Harms the Environment
Image: Ninara, Flickr

Concentrating Political Power Harms the Environment

The politician of today needs to be seen to be taking some action, and many do. The problem, however, has to do with the kind of action that can be taken. Our politicians are failing, not because of lack of desire but because of their inability to access the right advice.  

Let us take Delhi CM Kejriwal’s announcements, for instance, a few days before the pollution ‘season’ the CM announced some measures aimed at reducing pollution. Three of these – an app through which citizens can report pollution hotspots, a war room that can address these hotspots, and environment marshals are actually the same; with components where citizens report hotspots and a war room directs ‘marshals’ to quickly rush and control them. Another one, of odd-even car plying every alternate day, is no solution as it does not address the pollution problem but does reduce traffic. A recently announced smog tower is another such travesty, smog towers will not save the poor and underprivileged or the old and the children from the toxic nature of pollution; instead, they are merely showpieces designed to fool gullible citizens. Pollution masks are better, but they were given out last year as well, and we know most children did not use them for a range of reasons, the primary one being that they did not fit well. Yet another one, you would think cannot be faulted – tree planting; it focuses only on transplanting trees and planting new ones but there is no talk of maintenance, pruning, and focusing on planting native trees (the latter being critical from an ecological and ecosystem perspective). Which leaves us with community Diwali laser show and dust control which requires cleaning of roads. While the Delhi CM wants to show he is doing something, all his ‘solutions’ have one underlying thought - they should be visible. Smog tower, community laser show, pollution masks, odd-even, green app, war room, tree planting, cleaning of roads, etc. If some thought had gone behind them (locality level laser show, dedicated water harvesting for winter cleaning, native trees, block-level tree replacement, tightening of PUC certification rather than odd-even, etc.) then I would still grant the CM some benefit of doubt, but not this. But this is a government more intent on showing rather than doing.

The central government that also controls Delhi’s municipal services through the municipal commissioners has also been amazingly lax. But the difference is that this government is not even intent on showing significant action. Delhi’s garbage management is the dumps with little progress on waste management both on the collection and disposal side. Industrial effluents still largely flow into the Yamuna with no comprehensive plan for taking care of it.  Coal power plants in the vicinity of Delhi continue emitting toxic ash, emission control equipment has not been put in most of them, and all deadlines are breached. Other measures that helped like pushing ahead with EVs, directly subsidizing gas for cooking had other objectives where the environmental benefit was just a by-product. (Admittedly there is that one saving grace though, the government pushed ahead the deadline for BSVI and introduced low sulphur fuels early, but this has played out sometime back.)  

It is sometimes believed that politicians do what they get votes for. I beg to differ. If all politicians worked as per that rule ISRO, IIT, IIM, BARC, DSE, IISs, NDDB, and a host of other institutions would not have existed. Politicians can identify and support actions that do the right thing even if they get no additional votes for it. And so I wonder why does one group of today’s politicians put in a lot of effort to show they are doing something but spend little effort to figure out what they should do well and how? And why does another group of politicians not even bother to show that they are doing something?  

And it is also not about lack of funds. Spending Rs 20 crores for a smog tower when the city’s premier pollution-fighting regulator (DPCC) is short of staff and facilities. Garbage burning plants require very high-temperature incineration but that is not monitored enabling the contracting entities to get away by saving costs at the cost of generating toxic air. Strengthening of monitoring and enforcement within the government is a no-brainer, what good is a government that cannot enforce its own laws?

The more I think about it, it is not lack of desire, or corruption, nor short-sightedness, but a deep need to centralize decision-making. Not just in Delhi, look at every state of India and power is concentrated in a single office. Creating institutions requires decentralization and that is how expertise can be brought in to help contribute to the future. Centralization may have other benefits but it reduces nuances in decision-making, fine-tuning of government actions is more difficult, dependency on bureaucracy with short term career objectives is far more, and access to experts is limited.

Yes, the key factor behind endemic pollution and poor environment outcomes is the tendency of the modern Indian politician to centralize decision-making.

Jean-Joseph Boillot

Expert India-China-Africa @Cercle Cyclope

4 年

Excellent. Remind us of all the litterature from Leopold Kohr to Ivan Illich and others. Actually the answer is optimal size, but who will decide? Again politicians??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Laveesh Bhandari的更多文章

  • The Entrepreneurial Approach to Climate Change

    The Entrepreneurial Approach to Climate Change

    The economist’s approach of taxing high polluting and GHG emitting activities so that their prices reflect the mess…

    2 条评论
  • Only one sustainable solution for all pollution problems – polluter needs to pay

    Only one sustainable solution for all pollution problems – polluter needs to pay

    The practice of straw burning continues largely unabated. Finding other uses for straw is not working as straw is an…

    3 条评论
  • Subsidising Nature and Taxing Infrastructure

    Subsidising Nature and Taxing Infrastructure

    The Chardham project will link Rishikesh with Yamnotri, Gangotri, Kedardham, and Badrinath. It is costing slightly less…

    4 条评论
  • The New ‘Ecological Civilization’

    The New ‘Ecological Civilization’

    A unique experiment is occurring in China attractively named as the creation of an ‘ecological civilization’. The…

    2 条评论
  • Meluha, Sivakalai and the Missing Gangetic Civilization

    Meluha, Sivakalai and the Missing Gangetic Civilization

    Indus Valley which I call the Meluhan Civilization died out around BCE 1900. Post-Buddha, the writing of the great…

    3 条评论
  • Let’s Consume More But Damage Less

    Let’s Consume More But Damage Less

    It is now so apparent that the more we consume, the more environmental damage we cause. This holds true across most…

    2 条评论
  • Don’t Cry for Me, Alok Sharma

    Don’t Cry for Me, Alok Sharma

    It was so apparent even before the start of COP26 what the outcome would be, the only surprise is that it is being…

    3 条评论
  • Well Done, Prime Minister!

    Well Done, Prime Minister!

    India did the unexpected and committed to (a) Net Zero by 2070, (b) reduction in carbon emissions till 2030, (c)…

    12 条评论
  • The Straw Burning Solution

    The Straw Burning Solution

    Introduction The straw-burning season has started, and soon smoke will overwhelm us. Some days would be clearer than…

    4 条评论
  • Let us Change India’s Forest Laws

    Let us Change India’s Forest Laws

    The government has put up a consultation paper of its thoughts on changing the Forest Conservation Act 1980 (FCA 1980)…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了