Comparison: Monolithic vs Microservices

In this article, we are going to compare Monolithic vs Microservices Architecture. By this way, you will good understand which design better fits your business requirements and capacity.

Monolithic:

Monolithic applications are single-tiered, which means multiple components are combined into one large application. Consequently, they tend to have large codebases, which can be cumbersome to manage over time.

Furthermore, if one program component must be updated, other elements may also require rewriting, and the whole application has to be recompiled and tested. The process can be time-consuming and may limit the agility and speed of software development teams. Despite these issues, the approach is still in use because it does offer some advantages. Also, many early applications were developed as monolithic software, so the approach cannot be completely disregarded when those applications are still in use and require updates.

Benefits of monolithic architecture

Easy deployment – One executable file or directory makes deployment easier.

Development – When an application is built with one code base, it is easier to develop.

Performance – In a centralized code base and repository, one API can often perform the same function that numerous APIs perform with microservices.

Simplified testing – Since a monolithic application is a single, centralized unit, end-to-end testing can be performed faster than with a distributed application.? Easy debugging – With all code located in one place, it’s easier to follow a request and find an issue.

Disadvantages of a monolithic architecture

The disadvantages of a monolith include:?

Slower development speed – A large, monolithic application makes development more complex and slower.

Scalability – You can’t scale individual components.

Reliability – If there’s an error in any module, it could affect the entire application’s availability.

Barrier to technology adoption – Any changes in the framework or language affects the entire application, making changes often expensive and time-consuming.

Lack of flexibility – A monolith is constrained by the technologies already used in the monolith.

Deployment – A small change to a monolithic application requires the redeployment of the entire monolith.

Microservices

A microservices architecture, also simply known as microservices, is an architectural method that relies on a series of independently deployable services. These services have their own business logic and database with a specific goal. Updating, testing, deployment, and scaling occur within each service. Microservices decouple major business, domain-specific concerns into separate, independent code bases. Microservices don’t reduce complexity, but they make any complexity visible and more manageable by separating tasks into smaller processes that function independently of each other and contribute to the overall whole.?

Benefits of Microservices:

Agility – Promote agile ways of working with small teams that deploy frequently.

Flexible scaling – If a microservice reaches its load capacity, new instances of that service can rapidly be deployed to the accompanying cluster to help relieve pressure. We are now multi-tenanant and stateless with customers spread across multiple instances. Now we can support much larger instance sizes.?

Continuous deployment – We now have frequent and faster release cycles. Before we would push out updates once a week and now we can do so about two to three times a day.?

Highly maintainable and testable – Teams can experiment with new features and roll back if something doesn’t work. This makes it easier to update code and accelerates time-to-market for new features. Plus, it is easy to isolate and fix faults and bugs in individual services.

Independently deployable – Since microservices are individual units they allow for fast and easy independent deployment of individual features.?

Technology flexibility – Microservice architectures allow teams the freedom to select the tools they desire.?

High reliability – You can deploy changes for a specific service, without the threat of bringing down the entire application.

Happier teams – The teams who work with microservices are a lot happier, since they are more autonomous and can build and deploy themselves without waiting weeks for a pull request to be approved.

Disadvantages of Microservices:

Development sprawl – Microservices add more complexity compared to a monolith architecture, since there are more services in more places created by multiple teams. If development sprawl isn’t properly managed, it results in slower development speed and poor operational performance.?

Exponential infrastructure costs – Each new microservice can have its own cost for test suite, deployment playbooks, hosting infrastructure, monitoring tools, and more.

Added organizational overhead – Teams need to add another level of communication and collaboration to coordinate updates and interfaces.?

Debugging challenges – Each microservice has its own set of logs, which makes debugging more complicated. Plus, a single business process can run across multiple machines, further complicating debugging.?

Lack of standardization – Without a common platform, there can be a proliferation of languages, logging standards, and monitoring.?

Lack of clear ownership – As more services are introduced, so are the number of teams running those services. Over time it becomes difficult to know the available services a team can leverage and who to contact for support.

Choosing the Right Fit: It's About Your Project Needs

Selecting the right architecture depends on the specific needs of your project. If simplicity and initial development speed are crucial, a monolithic approach might be the way to go. On the other hand, for large, complex projects demanding scalability and flexibility, microservices might be the optimal choice. ??

Final Thoughts: Finding the Balance

In the dynamic world of software development, there's no one-size-fits-all solution. Striking a balance between simplicity and scalability is the key. Assess your project requirements, team expertise, and future growth plans to make an informed decision. ??

Let's discuss! Which architecture have you found more effective in your projects, and why? Share your insights in the comments below! ?? ???? hashtag#TechDiscussion hashtag#SoftwareArchitecture hashtag#MonolithicVsMicroservices hashtag#LinkedInArticlehashtag#softwaredevelopment hashtag#monolithic hashtag#microservices hashtag#webdevelopment hashtag#systemdesign hashtag#learning

Follow me on LinkedIn: www.dhirubhai.net/comm/mynetwork/discovery-see-all?usecase=PEOPLE_FOLLOWS&followMember=dipesh-nagpal

Happy Learning!