Comparison: LoRaWAN vs. Wi-Fi vs. 4G
For system integrators deploying security and remote monitoring solutions, choosing the right connectivity technology is critical for balancing cost, reliability, range, and scalability. Here’s a comparison of LoRaWAN, Wi-Fi, and 4G, focusing on real-world deployment considerations.
There are several brands in the U.S. market for LoRaWAN, Wi-Fi, and 4G/5G routers:
LoRaWAN: Kerlink, Multitech, RAKwireless, Laird Connectivity, Dragino, Tektelic, The Things Industries, etc
WIFI: Ubiquiti (UniFi), Cisco Meraki, Netgear (Orbi, Nighthawk), TP-Link (Omada), Aruba Networks (HPE), Ruckus Wireless, etc
4G: Peplink, Cradlepoint, Teltonika, Sierra Wireless, MOFI Network, Digi Intl, etc
Recommended Deployment:
For fixed, high-bandwidth deployments (camera, security, business automation) → Wi-Fi is the best choice.
For long-range, low-power IoT applications (smart sensors, metering, asset tracking) → LoRaWAN is ideal.
For mobile, remote, or backup connectivity (surveillance, field operations, temporary sites) → 4G/5G cellular is the way to go.
For mission-critical applications → Hybrid setup (e.g., Wi-Fi primary, 4G/5G backup, LoRaWAN for sensors).
#LoRaWAN #WiFi #4G #5G #Connectivity #RemoteMonitoring
? 2025 Homaxi Inc. All rights reserved.
Vice President
2 周Love this
Helping Companies Increase ROI X4/ Sales & Marketing Specialist
2 周Solid breakdown! Choosing the right connectivity is basically like picking the right partner—each comes with its quirks. LoRaWAN is the long-distance, low-maintenance type (great for sensors but not much for high-speed action). Wi-Fi is the clingy one—super fast but throws a fit if you’re too far away. And 4G? Reliable, always there for you… but expensive. At the end of the day, system integrators need to find ‘the one’ that balances cost, range, and reliability. So, what’s been your best (or worst) match in the field? Let’s hear the war stories!