Comparing the appetite regulating effects of Potato protein isolate and whey protein isolate.

Introduction

In the contemporary fight against obesity, dietary strategies have garnered significant attention due to their potential to aid in weight management without the adverse effects associated with surgical or pharmacological interventions. High-protein diets, in particular, are praised for their ability to enhance satiety and regulate appetite, thus reducing overall caloric intake. This article delves into a study comparing the appetite-regulating effects of two protein isolates: whey protein isolate, a widely used animal-derived protein, and potato protein isolate, an emerging plant-based alternative.

Study Rationale

Obesity is a growing global epidemic, with more than 1.9 billion adults classified as overweight and approximately 650 million of these as obese (WHO, 2021). Traditional interventions such as bariatric surgery and GLP-1 receptor agonist injections have their drawbacks, including potential adverse effects and the need for frequent administration (Herron, 2005); (Wang et al., 2023). Therefore, there is a need for dietary approaches that can effectively manage weight and appetite with minimal side effects.

High-protein diets have been shown to aid in muscle growth, fat loss, and the maintenance of fat-free mass (Moon & Koh, 2020). Animal-derived proteins, like whey, are highly regarded due to their rapid absorption rates, complete amino acid profiles, and high levels of essential branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) (Hoffman et al., 2006). However, whey protein can cause significant postprandial insulin spikes, which may not be ideal for individuals with type 2 diabetes or insulin resistance (Salehi et al., 2012).

Plant-based proteins, such as potato protein, present a viable alternative. Potato protein has a good amino acid profile, with higher contents of certain amino acids compared to whey protein (Tiekou Lorinczova et al., 2021). This study aimed to compare the appetite-regulating effects of whey protein isolate and potato protein isolate.

Study Design

The study employed a single-blind, triple-crossover design involving six male participants. Each participant consumed equicaloric porridge meals enriched with different proteins (whey or potato protein isolate) on separate days, with a minimum washout period of two days between each session. Blood glucose levels and subjective appetite perceptions were measured at baseline and at 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes post-ingestion using visual analogue scales (VAS).

Methods

Participants

Ten male participants aged 18 to 50 were initially recruited, but only six completed the study. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing medical conditions, allergies to test protein ingredients, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, and certain medical implants.

Intervention

The interventions included three porridge variations: one mixed with whey protein isolate, one with potato protein isolate, and a control porridge without added protein. Each porridge contained approximately 400 kcal.

Blood Sampling

Blood samples were collected using both finger prick and cannula methods at multiple time points. Glucose and lactate levels were measured using the BIOSEN C_Line EKF Diagnostic analyzer.

Appetite Assessment

Appetite was assessed using VAS, which measured parameters such as hunger, satisfaction, fullness, and prospective food intake.

Results

Glycemic Response

Finger prick glucose analysis showed that the whey protein group had the lowest blood glucose levels at the 30-minute mark, indicating better glycemic control. The potato protein group also exhibited good glycemic control but was less effective than whey. The control group showed the highest glucose spikes. Whole blood and plasma glucose analyses corroborated these findings, with whey protein showing the most consistent glucose control over time, followed by potato protein.

Lactate Response

Lactate levels were lower in both protein groups compared to the control group, indicating better metabolic control. The whey protein group showed a significant reduction in lactate levels over time, whereas the potato protein group exhibited higher initial levels but eventually matched the whey group.

Appetite Perception

VAS data indicated no significant differences in appetite perception between the whey and potato protein groups. Both proteins were effective in modulating appetite, though whey protein showed a slight edge in palatability and overall appeal.

Discussion

The study's findings highlight the potential of whey protein to offer superior glycemic control and appetite regulation compared to potato protein. However, potato protein still presents a viable alternative, particularly for individuals seeking plant-based protein sources or those with dairy intolerance.

Mechanisms of Action

Whey protein's appetite-suppressing effects may be attributed to its rapid digestion and absorption, leading to a quick release of amino acids that stimulate the secretion of hormones like GLP-1, which promote satiety (Rigamonti et al., 2020). Additionally, whey protein's high BCAA content might directly influence hypothalamic pathways that regulate hunger (Gietzen & Magrum, 2001).

Potato protein, despite being plant-based, has a favorable amino acid profile that includes higher levels of certain amino acids like proline, phenylalanine, valine, and tyrosine. These amino acids are known to suppress appetite and stimulate GLP-1 release (Rigamonti et al., 2020). The slower digestion rate of plant proteins might also contribute to sustained satiety by providing a steady release of amino acids and glucose.

Practical Implications

For athletes and individuals aiming to manage their weight, incorporating high-quality protein sources into their diet can significantly aid in controlling appetite and maintaining energy levels. Whey protein, with its rapid absorption and comprehensive amino acid profile, remains an excellent choice for post-exercise recovery and satiety. However, potato protein isolate offers a promising alternative for those seeking plant-based options or managing specific dietary restrictions.

Conclusion

This study adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the role of high-protein diets in appetite regulation and glycemic control. While whey protein isolate demonstrates superior efficacy in these areas, potato protein isolate presents a viable alternative, particularly for plant-based diets. Future research should explore the long-term effects of these proteins on weight management and metabolic health.

References

• BLUNDELL, J., ROGERS, P., & HILL, A. (1988). Uncoupling sweetness and calories: Methodological aspects of laboratory studies on Appetite Control. Appetite, 11, 54-61. doi:10.1016/0195-6663(88)90044-x.
• Diepvens, K., H?berer, D., & Westerterp-Plantenga, M. (2007). Different proteins and biopeptides differently affect satiety and anorexigenic/orexigenic hormones in healthy humans. International Journal of Obesity, 32(3), 510-518. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803758.
• Ding, X. (2018). Intestinal enteroendocrine L cells in amino acid sensing and diseases. Frontiers in Bioscience, 23(9), 1740-1753. doi:10.2741/4670.
• Engelstoft, M.S. et al. (2013). Seven transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor repertoire of gastric ghrelin cells. Molecular Metabolism, 2(4), 376-392. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2013.08.006.
• Franz, M.J. (1997). Protein: Metabolism and effect on blood glucose levels. The Diabetes Educator, 23(6), 643-651. doi:10.1177/014572179702300603.
• Gietzen, D.W. & Magrum, L.J. (2001). Molecular mechanisms in the brain involved in the anorexia of branched-chain amino acid deficiency. The Journal of Nutrition, 131(3). doi:10.1093/jn/131.3.851s.