This Company Spent 300,000 Hours a Year in Pointless Meetings
300,000 hours in one year. Reporters examined one large company's weekly executive committee meeting and found employees there spent that much time supporting it. Note that I said "supporting."
That is more than 34 years' worth of labor — frittered away in one year. I am sure leadership felt they needed those check-ins to share and gather information. But there is a better way to go about it.
People are drowning in meetings. Respondents to one survey said that too many meetings is the number-one time waster at work. It is not just the time spent in the meeting itself, but all the effort that goes into preparing for and supporting the meeting.
These unnecessary gatherings add up. And they come at a price.
In the U.S. alone, about a third of the approximately 11 million meetings that take place every day are unproductive — costing businesses an estimated $37 billion annually.
Meetings are not inherently a waste. As the co-founder and CEO of Aha!, I fully believe in frequent communication. And sometimes you need to meet live on a web meeting. We are one of the fastest-growing software companies in the U.S. and we are doing it all with an entirely remote team. No stuffy conference rooms here. But I still found my calendar filling up.
So I took steps to fix the problem. My approach can help you combat the drain on your attention and resources as well. The benefit to you and the company is more time spent on getting actual work done.
Here are five ways I combat meeting overload — and you can, too:
Book "work appointments"
I block off my entire Wednesday to minimize distractions. You might not be able to do the same, but you should be able to set aside multiple "appointments" with and for yourself so you can focus on getting your work done. You do not need to take yourself totally off the grid, but giving yourself some set chunks of work time can do wonders for your to-do list.
Think twice about invites
Are you quick to hit "accept" when you get a meeting invite? By doing so, you become part of the problem. You just set the expectation that there is no such thing as too many meetings. Instead, I take a moment to make sure I can actually contribute or gain critical new information by attending. If the answer is no, I let the organizer know why when I politely decline.
Assess the prep time
Not all of the time wasting happens during the meeting itself. At some point, you have probably prepared something to present — only to find there was no time or need to go over it. When I ask our team at Aha! to prep something before a meeting, I double check that the effort is worth the benefit. You can reduce your own load in supporting meetings by doing the same before you start working on that new report.
Stick to schedules
Ask for an agenda beforehand, show up on time, and stay focused on the main points. If important new topics come up, I usually move those into action items rather than extending past the agreed time limit. Whether you are the meeting organizer or attendee, you can play the same role — giving gentle reminders and steering the conversation back to the agreed-upon agenda.
Uninvite yourself
Many recurring meetings start out as essential... then become less so over time. If my presence is no longer needed, I do not hesitate to remove myself from the invite list. If the meeting itself has become less useful, suggest ways to make it effective again. And if the project itself has changed to the point that the meeting is no longer needed, speak up about that as well.
Fixing your company's over-reliance on meetings is not your sole responsibility. But there are many ways you can help.
Examine every meeting and invite and ask yourself, "Is this needed?" "Am I needed there?" Maybe you could be the one to save your organization 300,000 hours this year.
How many meetings do you attend that could be skipped?
ABOUT BRIAN AND AHA!
Brian de Haaff seeks business and wilderness adventure. He is the co-founder and CEO of Aha! — the world’s #1 product roadmap software — and the author of the bestselling new book Lovability. His two previous startups were acquired by well-known public companies. Brian writes and speaks about product and company growth and the adventure of living a meaningful life.
Sign up for a free trial of Aha! and see why 150,000+ users on the world's leading product and engineering teams trust Aha! to build brilliant strategy and visual roadmaps.
We are rapidly growing and hiring. Customer Success Managers. UX Designers. Rails Developers. Product Marketing Manager. Join a winning team — work from anywhere in the U.S. and a few international locations and be happy.
Originally shared on Inc.
The Artistic Actuary
6 年Here's how to keep a meeting on track. The only person in the room with an incentive to stick to the agenda and get some decisions made is the minute taker. So get the Chair to take the minutes. I expect there will be plenty of people commenting against this saying that nobody can run a meeting and take minutes at the same time. Probably because they think taking minutes is a huge task. The thing is, it's only a huge task if you have a lousy chair. If you can't do both at once, you shouldn't be running the meeting.
Enterprise Data Architect
6 年Gary Hamel's proposition comes to mind - there's simply too many managers. Over-managed and under-performing? A decade or so ago McKinsey were promoting the idea of "interaction" as the next big thing - an increasingly vital part of the transformation to an experience-based business proposition. Question is how much interaction do you get during meetings? And how do you evaluate its effectiveness? Compared to other "non-meeting" interactions? Maybe the costs of meetings should be monitored and allotted KPIs - we need to get all stakeholders together for a meeting about that, there's a major project in it.
Vice President Sales & Marketing | Key Account Management
6 年Can’t agree more