A common reason that teams fail
Teams aren't always the right solution. Photo by Antenna on Unsplash.

A common reason that teams fail

I'm a huge fan of teams and think that they are critical to the success of most organisations operating in a complex environment (pretty much any organisation in the 21st Century). This sort of a view also puts me at risk of a phenomenon I have observed. In many organisations, there is a potentially unhealthy obsession with teams at work.

It is important to realise that teams are not always the answer. There are times when the task at hand may be better suited to independent or leader dependent work.

When I am working with teams (or groups!), I'll often differentiate three ways of working - as individuals, as a group and as a team. Each of these types of working is better suited to different operating environments, different tasks and provide different benefits.

Individuals

?Work that requires no interaction with others. This type of work is best suited to simple environments, where there are very few variables and those that exist are easy to predict and control.

Group

Work that requires team members to do, not think. The leader has visibility and responsibility for all of the work that the team does. Best suited to complicated environments where there are many variables, but experienced leaders are able to confidently predict and control.

Team

Work that requires interdependence to be greater than the sum of their parts. The leader's responsibility is to empower and enable team members, who need to think and do. Teams are best suited in complex environments with increasing speed of change decreasing predictability.

With this in mind, it's easy to see how Richard Hackman can make a statement like...

"Contrary to conventional wisdom, teams may be your worst option for tackling a challenging task."

Teams are a way of working that we can choose to work. My hunch is that in our world, the work that we need is polarising - away from working as a group. That way of working is a product of the industrial revolution and generally not all that useful in the 21st century. Increasingly, we are needing to do more work as a team. There is also more scope for parts of our work (like me writing this post) that are best suited to working alone and as an individual.

Some questions for you to ponder are:

  • When do you need to operate as a team in your context?
  • Can you build the agility in your team that allows both team and individual work?

Go well,

Keegan

About the Author

Keegan Luiters is an independent consultant who works to bring teams together and elevate their performance.

You can find out more by or getting in touch directly, or to get these insights and more directly to your inbox, join the mailing list here.

Kate Kesby

Founder. Director. Coach. Facilitator.

5 年

Interesting perspective Keegan thanks for sharing - I would add that for many professionals their job requires all 3 at different times. Allowing these people some autonomy to chose their environment and times to work can lift both productivity and engagement.

Urszula Richards

Demystifying AI for leaders through personalised, hands-on guidance that turns tech complexity into practical business advantage. | AI Educator | Digital Linguist

5 年

Agreed! I was thinking as I read this that for some people (eg introverts) groups and teams are their least productive mode of work (not always of course! but as you say, task dependent).

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Keegan Luiters的更多文章

  • Teamership: Be bothered (selectively)

    Teamership: Be bothered (selectively)

    Rocky (my former PE teacher and now a mate) and Boomerang Adventures run great outdoor education experiences…

    2 条评论
  • Teamership: 25 ideas to lead teams better in 2025

    Teamership: 25 ideas to lead teams better in 2025

    I’ve written previously about how for teams… Rules suck. Principles rule.

    4 条评论
  • Teamership: Pragmatic, not dogmatic

    Teamership: Pragmatic, not dogmatic

    A simplistic (but often useful) way to distil our role in our teams is that we have two jobs: Making decisions…

  • Teamership: Just one thing

    Teamership: Just one thing

    I have recently discovered the late Dr Michael Mosley’s podcast, which is called “Just One Thing”. The premise is…

    4 条评论
  • Teamership: Gelato leadership

    Teamership: Gelato leadership

    On the weekend, I went to a local street festival with the family. There were market stalls including plenty of food…

    2 条评论
  • Teamership - A commitment to high performance

    Teamership - A commitment to high performance

    Don’t worry, this is not really about rugby league. There have and will be plenty more qualified people who analyse the…

    2 条评论
  • Teamership: 93% of organisations aren’t ready

    Teamership: 93% of organisations aren’t ready

    Research data in a 2019 report by global consultancy Deloitte highlights some interesting opportunities and gaps. The…

  • Teamership: Robust is not resilient

    Teamership: Robust is not resilient

    Resilience has become a buzzword in organisations. On occasion, resilience (or a lack of it) is used to imply that an…

  • Teamership: Co-operative is not collaborative

    Teamership: Co-operative is not collaborative

    Every senior leader that I speak with is seeking better collaboration - within their team and across their business…

    1 条评论
  • Teamership: Start where you are. Do what you can.

    Teamership: Start where you are. Do what you can.

    It is valuable to make a distinction between simple and easy. The objective of a marathon is simple – run 42.

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了