The Commissioning Process - Clarifying Responsibilities and Liabilities
Shady Yehia, CFM? ProFM?
Head of Facilities and Real Estate Management at Genpact | ProFM 22 Scholarship Winner | AfricaFM Ambassador | NEBOSH | IOSH | Lean Six Sigma Green Belt | PMP? | COSHH Risk Assessor | Chemical & Bimolecular Engineering
In the intricate world of construction, the commissioning process stands as a pivotal phase that ensures all systems and subsystems in a building function as intended. It's a rigorous quality assurance process that begins even before the construction starts and continues through the building's lifecycle. One of the primary objectives of commissioning is to delineate responsibilities, ensuring clarity and preventing potential disputes down the line. Let's deep dive into how this process works and why it's so crucial.
Defining Responsibilities
At the heart of the commissioning process is the clear definition of who is responsible for what. This involves specifying which party is accountable for specific subsystems, systems, and the integrated building as a whole. Such clarity is not just about assigning tasks; it's about ensuring that every stakeholder knows their role and the expectations associated with it.
Addressing Liabilities
One of the significant advantages of defining responsibilities upfront is the clarity it brings to liabilities, especially concerning corrective work and retesting. If a system doesn't function as intended, knowing who was responsible for it helps determine who will bear the costs of rectification.
All contractors and subcontractors must be kept in the loop about these liabilities. This transparency ensures that everyone is on the same page and works diligently to avoid errors that could lead to additional costs.
However, it's worth noting that not all corrective actions result from negligence or errors on the part of the contractor or subcontractor. In situations where the issue wasn't due to their fault, they might still be tasked with making the necessary corrections. However, they can recover the additional costs through a change order, ensuring fairness in the process.
Owner-Contractor Agreements
These agreements play an important role in the commissioning process. They outline in detail who is responsible for each system or equipment piece. Such agreements are especially vital when using a traditional design-bid-build format. In such scenarios, when prescriptive or descriptive specifications are employed, the owner typically bears the design risk for system performance. This is, of course, assuming that the system was installed according to the design and construction documents.
领英推荐
Commissioning - Your Orchestra Conductor for Building Harmony
Think of the commissioning process as the conductor of your building's symphony. It's a meticulous dance of planning, testing, and fine-tuning, ensuring every instrument (system) plays its part in perfect harmony. This translates to:
Stages in the Process
Just like any good conductor, the commissioning process follows a well-defined score:
Remember, Facility Pros:
Conclusion
The commissioning process, with its emphasis on clarity and responsibility, ensures that buildings are not just constructed but are built to last and function efficiently. By defining roles, addressing liabilities, and using clear owner-contractor agreements, it paves the way for smoother construction projects, fewer disputes, and buildings that meet the highest standards of quality and performance.