Combatting the rise of antibiotic resistance

Combatting the rise of antibiotic resistance

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines a microorganism that is not killed/inactivated after the due course of treatment as ‘resistant’, and the rise in resistant organisms is multifactorial. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections occur each year, resulting in 35,000+ deaths. Worryingly, projections made by the World Bank estimate this number might increase to 10 million deaths a year by 2050.

As such, the WHO has declared antimicrobial resistance as one of the top ten primary health concerns, and new solutions are urgently needed.

Antibiotic resistance is multifactorial

Antibiotic resistance can result from both intrinsic and acquired factors. Intrinsic factors include cell wall permeability, modified drug targets, activation of efflux pumps, and enzymatic degradation of antibiotics. Acquired resistance arises from the gain of new genetic material or mutation in the bacterial genome that mediates survival.

Figure 1. Four common antimicrobial resistance mechanisms found in bacteria that can originate from mutations or resistance plasmids. A. Modified cell wall permeability, which reduces or prevents antimicrobial entry to the bacteria. B. Modification/absence of the drug’s target reducing drug binding leading to reduced efficacy. C. Efflux pumps can be expressed in response to antimicrobial treatment and lead to an antibiotic’s removal before it has time to take effect. D. Enzymatic degradation of an antibiotic can prevent its efficacy.

The need for new antibacterial treatments

Antibiotics cover many different classes. Each one is categorized by its structure and how it tackles bacteria in the body.

Antibiotic class and structure:

  • Aminoglycosides (e.g., streptomycin, 57-92-1)

Aminoglycosides structure

  • Beta-lactams (e.g., penicillin, 61-33-6)

Beta-lactams structure

  • Sulfonamides (e.g., sulfadiazine, 68-35-9)

Sulfonamides structure

  • Amphenicols (e.g., chloramphenicol, 56-75-7)

Amphenicols structure

Polymyxins structure

  • Tetracyclines (e.g., tetracycline, 60-54-8)

Tetracyclines structure

Macrolides structure

  • Pyrimidines (e.g., sulfadiazine, 68-35-9)

Pyrimidines structure

Rifamycins structure

  • Quinolones and fluoroquinolones (e.g., nalidixic acid, 389-08-2)

Quinolones and fluoroquinolones structure

Streptogramins structure

  • Lincosamides (e.g., lincomycin, 154-21-2)

Lincosamides structure

Pleuromutilins structure

Oxazolidinones structure

(Table 1. The different classes of antibiotics.)

Despite these established treatment options, many infections are becoming resistant to existing antibiotic treatments. Coupled with an estimated rise in related deaths, there is a pressing need to rethink how we tackle bacterial infections.

The challenges new antimicrobials face

While the rise in antimicrobial resistance is multifaceted, it is compounded by the slower pace of developing new treatment options compared to the rate of antimicrobial resistance development.

This is apparent when looking at the number of journal publications around antimicrobial resistance vs. the low proportion of patents (Figure 2). This indicates that researchers in academia are taking a more prominent role in developing new antimicrobials — and that these efforts must be translated into commercially available therapies.

Figure 2. The number of journal and patent publications per year in the antimicrobial research field (shown as blue and yellow bars, respectively) over the last decade (2012–2022).

This can be explained by several factors that make antimicrobial development challenging. Beyond many innate or acquired mechanisms microbes can use to resist antimicrobials (Figure 1), there are also broader factors that make development difficult (Figure 3).

The ability of bacteria to tolerate antimicrobials, combined with the high development cost and long timeframes (Figure 3), has led to few antibiotics reaching the market in recent decades despite the dire need.

Figure 3. Factors that can confound antimicrobial development.

Alternatives to conventional antibiotics

Bringing new antibiotics to market is a time-consuming challenge (Figure 3), so alternatives are helping combat antimicrobial resistance.

Table 2. Alternatives to conventional antibiotics

The future of antimicrobials

Enhanced drug delivery methods through materials can provide localized, prolonged, and stimulus-dependent antibacterial activity. There are several ways of achieving antimicrobial delivery outside of traditional administration. Medical devices such as implants and catheters can be infection sources, which can be potentially prevented by using antimicrobial materials. Likewise, antimicrobial coatings on high-traffic surfaces can reduce the transmission of microbes and minimize the need for cleaning.

Figure 4. Materials and solutions that can reduce antibiotic usage.

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to an acceleration in antimicrobial drug development using algorithms to identify potential new molecules. Although the number of journal publications has steadily increased, there hasn’t been a corresponding surge in patent applications, suggesting that most antimicrobial AI research is still in the academic stage (Figure 5).

Figure 5. The rapid growth of publications and patents for antimicrobial development involving AI approaches (Journals – Blue, Patents – Yellow).

The rise in multi-drug-resistant bacteria poses an alarming threat to human health, and the need to develop novel antibiotics and antibacterial materials is urgent. Widespread AI use is still in its infancy; however, it holds promise for streamlining and reducing timelines for future efforts. Learn more about AI’s impact on chemistry in our Insights Report, the rise of large-language models, and how biomaterials are being used across the therapeutic landscape in a variety of new approaches.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了