Collaborative Leadership: Axing the Culture of Competition

By Mark Mindel, MSc, PhD (ABD)

Introduction

In today's organizations, workplace wellness has emerged as a crucial factor for enhancing employee productivity, satisfaction, and overall organizational success. Effective leadership, which avoids the adversarial nature of competition, plays a pivotal role in cultivating an environment that prioritizes well-being. This essay delves into the concept of workplace wellness, the detrimental effects of competitive leadership, and how true leaders foster a collaborative and supportive workplace culture. By examining social theories, industrial psychology, and the specific impact on equity-deserving individuals, we will illustrate why the workplace should not be treated as a competitive sport and how a cooperative approach leads to sustainable success in both Canadian and American contexts.

The Concept of Workplace Wellness

Workplace wellness refers to initiatives and programs aimed at improving the physical, mental, and emotional health of employees. These programs can range from physical health initiatives, such as gym memberships and healthy eating programs, to mental health support, including counselling services and stress management workshops. The objective is to create a supportive environment that enables employees to thrive both personally and professionally.

Research in industrial and organizational psychology underscores the importance of workplace wellness. Studies have shown that employees who perceive their workplace as supportive and inclusive exhibit higher job satisfaction, lower stress levels, and increased productivity (American Psychological Association, 2021). In Canada, similar findings are reported by the Canadian Mental Health Association (2021), which highlights that supportive work environments lead to better mental health outcomes and overall productivity. Furthermore, organizations that invest in wellness programs tend to see a reduction in absenteeism, lower healthcare costs, and improved employee retention (Goetzel et al., 2019).

Competitive Leadership: A Detriment to Workplace Wellness

Contrary to fostering a positive workplace environment, competitive leadership can have adverse effects on employee well-being. Leaders who emphasize competition often create a culture of rivalry, where employees vie against one another for recognition, promotions, and rewards. This competitive atmosphere can lead to heightened stress, anxiety, and burnout among employees, as they constantly strive to outperform their peers.

Social comparison theory, proposed by Leon Festinger (1954), offers insights into the negative impacts of competitive leadership. According to this theory, individuals have an innate drive to evaluate their abilities and achievements relative to others. In a competitive workplace, this comparison often leads to feelings of inadequacy, low self-esteem, and diminished job satisfaction, especially for those who perceive themselves as less successful (Festinger, 1954).

Moreover, the constant pressure to compete can stifle creativity and innovation. Employees become risk-averse, fearing that any failure might jeopardize their standing within the organization. This environment can hinder collaborative efforts, as individuals are more focused on personal success than collective achievement (Edmondson, 1999). In both Canadian and American workplaces, the shift towards a competitive culture has been shown to negatively impact employee morale and innovation.

The Harm of Competition on Equity-Deserving Individuals

Equity-deserving individuals, including those from marginalized communities such as women, people of colour, 2SLGBTQI+ individuals, and persons with disabilities, face unique challenges in competitive work environments. The systemic barriers and biases they encounter can exacerbate the negative impacts of competition, leading to significant harm.

1. Increased Stress and Anxiety

For equity-deserving individuals, the pressure to compete can be particularly intense. Research shows that these individuals often feel they must work harder to prove their worth and overcome stereotypes and biases. This additional burden can lead to heightened stress and anxiety, adversely affecting their mental and physical health (American Psychological Association, “Stress in America”).

A study by the American Psychological Association found that marginalized employees experience higher levels of workplace stress due to discrimination and microaggressions. When combined with a competitive culture, this stress can become overwhelming, leading to burnout and disengagement (American Psychological Association, “Stress in America”).

2. Imposter Syndrome and Self-Doubt

Competitive environments can exacerbate imposter syndrome, a psychological pattern where individuals doubt their accomplishments and fear being exposed as frauds. Equity-deserving individuals are particularly susceptible to imposter syndrome due to systemic inequities and underrepresentation in leadership roles (Clance and Imes).

Research by Clance and Imes highlighted that women and people of colour often experience imposter syndrome more acutely in professional settings. In a competitive workplace, these feelings of self-doubt are magnified, diminishing their confidence and hindering their career progression (Clance and Imes).

3. Barriers to Advancement

Competitive cultures often prioritize individual achievements over collective success, which can disadvantage equity-deserving individuals. Biases in performance evaluations and promotion decisions can result in these individuals being overlooked for advancement opportunities, despite their qualifications and contributions (Center for Talent Innovation).

A report by the Center for Talent Innovation found that women and minorities are less likely to receive high-profile assignments and sponsorship, which are critical for career advancement. In a competitive workplace, this lack of support further entrenches systemic inequities and limits their professional growth (Center for Talent Innovation).

4. Isolation and Lack of Support

Competitive workplaces can foster a culture of isolation, where employees are reluctant to collaborate or support one another. For equity-deserving individuals, this lack of social support can be particularly detrimental, as they may already feel marginalized and excluded.

Social support is crucial for workplace well-being, as it provides a sense of belonging and community. Research by Cohen and Wills demonstrated that social support acts as a buffer against stress, enhancing mental health and job satisfaction. In the absence of a supportive environment, equity-deserving individuals are more likely to experience feelings of isolation and disengagement (Cohen and Wills).

True Leadership: Embracing Collaboration Over Competition

True leaders understand that the workplace is not a competitive sport but a collaborative endeavour. They prioritize the well-being of their employees and create a culture of support and cooperation. By fostering an inclusive environment where employees feel valued and respected, leaders can enhance workplace wellness and drive organizational success.

Transformational leadership theory, developed by James MacGregor Burns (1978), emphasizes the importance of inspiring and motivating employees to achieve their full potential. Transformational leaders focus on creating a shared vision, encouraging innovation, and providing individualized support to their team members. This leadership style has been shown to improve employee engagement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment.

Additionally, the concept of psychological safety, introduced by Amy Edmondson (1999), highlights the importance of creating a work environment where employees feel safe to take risks and express their ideas without fear of negative consequences. Leaders who cultivate psychological safety enable their teams to collaborate more effectively, leading to greater innovation and problem-solving capabilities.

In both Canadian and American workplaces, transformational leadership and psychological safety have been identified as key factors in promoting a healthy work environment. Canadian organizations, such as the Mental Health Commission of Canada (2021), advocate for leadership practices that prioritize employee well-being and inclusivity.

Social Theories and Industrial Psychology: Insights into Workplace Wellness

Several social theories and principles of industrial psychology provide further understanding of the importance of non-competitive leadership in promoting workplace wellness.

• Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: Abraham Maslow’s theory posits that individuals are motivated by a hierarchy of needs, starting with basic physiological needs and moving up to self-actualization. In the context of the workplace, leaders who address employees' higher-order needs, such as belongingness, esteem, and self-actualization, create a more fulfilling and motivating environment (Maslow, 1943).
• Self-Determination Theory (SDT): Developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, SDT emphasizes the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in fostering intrinsic motivation. Leaders who support these psychological needs help employees develop a sense of ownership over their work, enhance their skills, and build meaningful relationships, all of which contribute to workplace wellness (Deci & Ryan, 1985).
• Equity Theory: Proposed by John Stacey Adams, equity theory suggests that employees seek fairness in the workplace and are motivated when they perceive equitable treatment. Leaders who promote fairness and transparency in their practices reduce feelings of resentment and inequity, leading to higher morale and satisfaction (Adams, 1963).

Conclusion

In conclusion, workplace wellness and effective leadership are inextricably linked. True leaders recognize that the workplace should not be a competitive arena but a collaborative space where employees feel supported and valued. By embracing social theories and principles of industrial psychology, leaders can create an environment that enhances well-being, fosters innovation, and drives sustainable success. Moving away from a competitive mindset and towards a culture of cooperation is essential for building resilient and thriving organizations. For equity-deserving individuals, the impact of competition can be particularly harmful, exacerbating stress, imposter syndrome, and barriers to advancement. By fostering an inclusive and supportive environment, leaders can mitigate these harms and promote equity and well-being for all employees, ensuring sustainable success in both Canadian and American workplaces.

References

Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422-436.

American Psychological Association. (2018). Stress in America: The state of our nation. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2017/state-nation.pdf

American Psychological Association. (2021). Work, stress, and health & socioeconomic status. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/work-stress-health

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

Canadian Centre for Diversity and Inclusion. (2020). Inclusion at work. Retrieved from https://www.ccdi.ca

Canadian Mental Health Association. (2021). Workplace mental health. Retrieved from https://www.cmha.ca/workplace

Center for Talent Innovation. (2019). Being black in corporate America. Retrieved from https://www.talentinnovation.org/assets/BeingBlack-KeyFindings-CTI.pdf

Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241-247.

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.

Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.

Goetzel, R. Z., et al. (2019). Workplace wellness programs: Services for employee health and productivity. The Health Project. Retrieved from https://www.thehealthproject.com/publications/workplace-wellness

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.

Mental Health Commission of Canada. (2021). Workplace mental health. Retrieved from https://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca