COVID-19 In retrospect.

COVID-19 In retrospect.

COVID-19 in Retrospect

I wrote an article regarding COVID-19 sometime in March 2020.

I was frustrated with the pandemic.

I knew though of families within my circle of influence who had experienced COVID-19 and had lost loved ones.

Therefore, I thought that I was being overly emotional in the article and did not publish this paper.

It is though always interesting to read about something, later to evaluate whether you were correct or not in your conclusions.

Part of the article reads thus.

*COVID-19 information

I have evaluated *two written resources from the initial Chinese outbreak.

The reported age grouped mortality rate (on all cases) that was reported is:

+80 years old ???????????????????14.8% (confirmed 21%)

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????70-79 years old????????????????8.0%

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????60-69 years old????????????????3.6%

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????50-59 years old????????????????1.3%

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????40-49 years old????????????????0.4%

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????30-39 years old????????????????0.2%

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????20-29 Years old????????????????0.2%

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????10-19 years old????????????????0.2%

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????0-9 years old?????????????????????0.0%

?

The mortality rate initially reported in China was 2%.

The mortality rate estimate was re-adjusted by the W.H.O. (as of March 3, 2020) to that of 3.4%.

?It must be remembered each country will have a different mortality rate when considering age.?As can be noted from the above-mentioned figures, mortality becomes more of a reality as you get older.

?From 50 years of age?and above the situation moves from what (I believe) appears to be a normal flu condition to that of a pandemic.

?Different countries have different mortality rates, your typical European countries have older population where Germany and Italy's over 65 population are around 22 to 23%.

?This will generally result in a higher anticipated mortality. The mortality rate in Germany and Italy should be around 3.4%.

?African countries typically have a younger population distribution. Our +65 population sits at around 6% therefore our total anticipated mortality will be lower at round 1.23%.

?Note: Underlying conditions have not been considered.

The frightening fact is that with an earthly population of seven billion, (if we do not win the fight, if there is no intervention and with an 80% infection rate) earth will face a mortality rate of 112 (2%) to 190 (3.4%) million people (according to W.H.O figures) with COVID-19.

Today – 2022/02/03

Global declared mortality due to COVID 19 is 5.7 Million. (Over a two-year period)

It will be argued that this is a poor reflection of the actual mortality rate.

Do, we need to ask ourselves some questions?

Did the world win its fight against COVID-19?

Did we blow things out of proportion?

What can we say about our leadership?

What can be said about the Media?

How are we going to respond on the next occasion?

Is this “pandemic” over?

* The majority of information was found on the internet site "worldometer". The two documents were "Report of W.H.O. - China joint mission (Feb 28, 2020) & a paper by the Chinese CCDC released on Feb. 17 2020. Other information regarding population was obtained on Wikipedia




Michael Shadung

IT Governance, Risk and Compliance | IT Security | Business Process Improvement | Social Justice | Leadership and Sustainability Enthusiast

3 年

These 'hard questions' should be answered; at least one has to seek answers for himself for the purpose of learning and improvement. And being honest to oneself will be key to get objective answers; no emotional responses.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Keith Davey的更多文章

  • Greenhouse gasses, the hypothesis...

    Greenhouse gasses, the hypothesis...

    Global Warming Green House Gasses (GHG) cause Global warming is a hypothesis. A hypothesis is: It is a supposition, or…

  • TRUST ESKOM?

    TRUST ESKOM?

    Trust…Eskom? The Government controls Eskom. Eskom is the biggest emitter of green-house gasses (GHG) in South Africa.

  • No load Shedding in Gauteng

    No load Shedding in Gauteng

    Gauteng’s Batteries Hydroelectricity is electricity produced from generators driven by turbines, that convert potential…

    3 条评论
  • Global WarNing

    Global WarNing

    The overview of greenhouse gas emission in 2018 is the following. 81% Carbon Dioxide.

    1 条评论
  • NUMB, DUMB & COVID-19

    NUMB, DUMB & COVID-19

    I was writing this article called "Numb & Dumb" shortly before South Africa went into lock-down due to COVID-19. The…

  • ESKOM and it's lost electricity

    ESKOM and it's lost electricity

    Part 1 - A "Building a better future" article. In the news there has been talk of our President encouraging investment.

  • Transporting an iceberg - seriously!

    Transporting an iceberg - seriously!

    Solving the Western Capes Water Crisis A Practical, Innovative, Cost effective SOLUTION. Gauteng is a dry province with…

  • High Impact Children Stories

    High Impact Children Stories

    For the attention of potential publishers and parents with young children. Chasing Shadows Cleo was a small furry dog.

  • IF Trump has his Gulf of America, I have my EARTH orientation....

    IF Trump has his Gulf of America, I have my EARTH orientation....

    It has been defined as the greatest conspiracy and cover up since Darwin pondered upon creationism. Entire nations and…

  • AGGLOMERATION

    AGGLOMERATION

    When it is decided to agglomerate, get your objective clear in your head before proceeding. It needs to be understood…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了