Cobra Effect – the law of unintended consequences!
Krishnakumar Ramanathan
Managing Director and Group CEO S & S Power | Acrastyle | Hamilton Research and Technology | At the intersection of Engineering and Management lie infinite possibilities!
All views are personal. Sources are cited. Feedback is welcome.
Cobra Effect – the law of unintended consequences! / 074, 29 Apr 2023
It is an interesting anecdote which gives this article its unique name. In19th century India, there were a lot of cobras in and around Delhi, and deaths due to snakebites were common. To improve the situation, the British authorities announced a bounty for every dead cobra brought in. At first, it seemed to work well, with lots of dead cobras being brought in. With time, the number of cobras being brought in by people should have reduced in proportion to the surviving population. Yet, the number of dead cobras being brought in increased week after week. The authorities were at first confused, and then suspicious. They investigated and found that people had started breeding cobras to make extra money; in fact, many cobra farms had mushroomed in and around Delhi. Since it was easier to kill captive cobras than seek them out in the open, most of the cobras being brought in were actually from the farms, and not from the open streets.
On nearly every parameter, whether eliminating the open dangers in the street, or in controlling the cobra population, or in reducing the number of snakebites, the bounty had the exact opposite consequences of what it had been designed for. This gave rise to the Cobra effect – the law of unintended consequences, where we get totally opposite results to what we plan for. This theory was first introduced by German economist Horst Siebert in the 1950s. In short, the Cobra effect is a phenomenon in which an attempted solution actually worsens the original problem. It is a reminder for all of us to take the time to think through and understand the full implications of our decisions, however well-intentioned they may be. History is rife with such examples where well-intentioned decisions have actually worsened the original problems:
In business too, we see the Cobra effects of decisions all the time! Some examples readily come to mind:
a. We give high Sales targets without considering the Mfg. capacity, or we may give Mfg. targets without looking at the market situations. Unaligned Targets in an organisation have the cobra effect of causing internal conflicts and causing customer dissatisfaction!
b. Cutting deemed ‘unnecessary’ costs such as training, travel, if not judiciously implemented, can have the cobra effect of creating low employee and company performance!
c. For senior management, it is important to have some long-term targets, because focusing on short-term targets may create the cobra effect of endangering the long-term future of an organisation!
So how do we prevent such Cobra effects in our organisation? It is not difficult, but requires patience, though. A few points from personal experience:
While careful consideration may result in some delay, it will save time and effort in the long run. Coming back to our story of the Cobras, it didn’t have a happy ending. The British authorities, on finding that people were deliberately breeding cobras, abruptly scrapped the bounty. The people, well, didn’t find the cobras lucrative anymore, and so they just released them into the open. Thus, creating an even bigger problem than before! And so was created the parable of the Cobra effect, which, metaphorically, finds resonance in every aspect of our lives, personal, societal, economic, or political.
领英推荐
I hope you enjoyed reading this one, and as always, I request you to share your own thoughts and experiences in the comments section. Let us build a conversation on this topic!
Warm regards, Krishnakumar.
?
?
Image courtesy:
References:
Client Partner & Delivery Executive
1 年Wonderful article Krishna. I enjoyed reading it with my son. The sketches caught his attention.
Sr. HR Leader | Problem Solver| HR Strategist| Passionate about driving organizational growth through people| Ex. SIEMENS
1 年Great Insights Thanks for sharing Krishnakumar Ramanathan
Co Founder/ Managing Partner: Future~Fluence? | Director: Explode Leadership & Strategy Pvt Ltd | Naval Officer | People & Process Adaptability | Systems thinking | Mentor to Leaders,CXOs and Business Owners
1 年Unintended consequences can be hugely reduced if we get to shift from industrial age linear thinking, to systems thinking. Which is focussing on the relationships between elements in a system, and how the resultant action from that + ve / -ve relation imapacts other elements. Not a new-fangled buzz, it is conciously using the radial thinking we are born with to learn and make sense. Then "education" happens. Example frameworks used to make sense and execute, based on system thinking, new to old: Design Thinking; Operational Art (used in military); all relegious concepts of consequences (sin, karma, paap - punya etc). Actually ancient traditional cultural wisdom on action and resultant action are about relationships in a system and time, timing, timelines. When science wanted to mimic nature it had to get into understanding systems. As that science becomes accessible technology, we have to leave the linear thinking and shift to this kind of radial thinking. Important, when we set out our expectations, plans and implementation, to minimise unintended consequences . Krishnakumar Ramanathan thanks for bringing focus to unintended consequences, because people will use any policy in a way most advantageous to them.
Electricals, Energy, Sustainability, Renewable, Automation, Ex Siemens, Ex Vedanta
1 年Superb article sir!
We are manufacturer of Precision Parts, Fasteners, Customised Products from Steel used in Automobile Industry, Aerospace,Infrastructure.
1 年An eye opening message, thank you for sharing!