CMS Ruling on Short-Term Medical Plans
Arthur Barlow
Compass helps insurance agents write more business in less time with our technology, marketing, training, support, and compliance solutions.
There has been a lot of talk about the recently finalized ruling on short-term medical coverage by CMS under the Biden Administration.
The ruling is a significant step towards protecting consumers from low-quality health coverage, commonly associated with what some term as "junk" health plans.
However, I believe it's crucial to recognize that there are quality short-term plans available, especially for healthy individuals who may not qualify for tax credits through the marketplace.
Here's a quick overview of what the ruling entails:
领英推荐
Looking ahead, it's clear that innovation in the private market will be essential to cater to healthy clients who don't qualify for subsidies but still want major medical coverage outside of the marketplace.
Additionally, revisions for fixed indemnity accepted benefit coverage are introduced, ensuring that consumers are fully aware of the limitations of such coverage options.
For those of you dealing with existing policies issued before September 1st, 2024, the previous regulations will still apply, subject to state law limitations.
I recommend rewriting short-term clients on a two or three-year plan in August to get them grandfathered in while we await more adequate options in the private market.
Short Term Medical plans can be a great option for a lot of consumers who don't meet the qualifications to receive a subsidized marketplace plan. We'll be doing our best to keep you updated as the private market adapts to these changes before the ruling goes into effect.
#InsuranceNews #HealthInsurance #CMS #ShortTermMedical
Financial Planner at Equitable Advisors.
6 个月Great advice!
Insurance Broker & Consultant | MBA | Business & HR Strategist | ERISA Compliance | Affordable Care Act Pro | Payroll | Technology | Medicare
6 个月Very much agree there are great quality short term medical insurance products, thanks for posting. It's unfortunate for many STM consumers that this ruling moved forward. However, it's also unfortunate that the market included over priced junk indemnity plans, or more specifically that agents were selling them as if they were true catastrophic insurance plans. A problem this ruling creates is it cuts out the creative ability for insurers to create products that fit a quality and price point model that consumers can benefit from. Overall, this is not a win for consumers.