Climate Resilience Dispatch from Resilience Week 2024, Austin, TX
Andrew Bochman
Not an AI | INLer & Atlantic Council Global Energy Center Non Resident Senior Fellow | Speaker, Author, Advisor | Views are my own. ???? ????
This week marked the 16th running of a conference that was originally focused on control systems and cybersecurity, primarily for academics. Over the years it has grown substantially in terms topics covered, participant types and audience size.
I’m going to reprise my opening remarks below, but first let me introduce the crew of experts for the “Climate Resilience Planning for Utilities” panel, which in the final day in a too early slot, drew a small but rather engaged crowd.
Opening Remarks in 5 Parts
(Somewhat modified for this medium, went something like this)
I. In an opening like this one a well-established norm is to list off the most recent disastrous climate-amplified events. I’ll name a few of the higher impact ones: Beryl, Hermine, Milton, and the unnamed thing – a “cold drop” – that landed in/on Valencia, Spain. All four of these brought prolonged power outages, death, and in several cases, entire substations simply washing away, transformers, switchgear, and all.
?
II. Then the speaker would pivot to the humiliating failure of COP29 to reinforce the point that atmospheric and oceanic temps – notwithstanding a full eruption of the super volcano under Yellowstone or global nuclear war – are guaranteed to continue rising for the foreseeable future. Which means impacts are guaranteed to continue worsening.
III. ?What’s happening in adaptation and resilience? Lots of good action, much coming from the national labs and elsewhere, though not nearly up to the ever-expanding task at hand, including:
IV.? So there’s lots of studying and even some planning, but what about adaptation or resilience ACTIONS?? Hardening or moving key assets?? Protecting critical function? Some of this is happening in places that have already been slammed, like California, New Orleans and New York/New Jersey. But what about elsewhere? Is a local catastrophe required before enough pain is felt and political will is mustered for significant action can happen?
V. 2 closing provocations for panelists:
Then the panelists were off to the races sharing their thoughts and describing their organizations' actions to date. We got some good questions from attendees in closing minutes and one, asking how we might know if utilities were doing enough to prepare, prompted me to recommend a formative assessment tool for baselining and gauging progress: the Climate Resilience Maturity Model (CRMM).
?
Distinguished Researcher at Idaho National Laboratory
2 个月I almost made a bet on use of the word “existential” in this panel.
Vice President, Climate Resilience at ICF
2 个月Thanks for the recap, Andy! I was bummed to have missed out--sounds like a good set of information.
Andy, sorry to have missed you at the conference. Will cord better next time. In lieu of upcoming admin changes and focus on climate hoaxes versus fixes, what incentives does DOD push to utilities etc to keep after what John Conger was getting at?
eDiscovery Consultant - eForensics | Complex Cyber-Enabled Investigations - Expert Witness Cybersecurity - Investigations in End-Points and Critical Infrastructures - Mobile Devices (Opinions Expressed are Mine)
3 个月Worth attending. The people and presenters are great. The is an excellent place to exchange resilience knowledge, skills, experiences and practices. Well worth the time and effort to attend Larry Leibrock
President, Conger Strategies & Solutions
3 个月I appreciate your highlighting the fact that emissions continue to increase, despite everyone’s efforts. I think success has little to do with COP successes or failures but instead whether consumers and corporations are given choices that provide more capability for less money. While some will sacrifice for the future, most won’t. You have to give them better choices that optimize for their immediate benefit. Both in mitigation and adaptation. Relying on the global market or community to act in long term collective interest is a bit of a hope-based strategy. If you assume people always act in their own best interest (not always true), then how do you provide a path that also benefits the globe and future generations?