The Climate Of Business #138: Can products really be 'climate positive'?
Lubomila Jordanova
CEO & Founder Plan A & Co-Founder Greentech Alliance │ Obama Leader │ MIT Under 35 Innovator │ LinkedIn Top Voice
Climate Change Reality
Business Reality
Reality Check?
The concept of climate-positive products goes beyond traditional sustainability. Climate positive refers to activities that go beyond achieving net-zero carbon emissions to create an environmental benefit by removing additional carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. As climate change impacts intensify, companies are increasingly drawn to this model, hoping to meet consumer expectations while contributing positively to the planet. Accordingly, this week's newsletter will dive deep into whether these climate positive products can truly capture consumer interest.?
What do climate positive products actually look like?
Climate positive products are distinguished by actively drawing down carbon from the atmosphere. This is typically achieved through a combination of materials, manufacturing processes, and even post-consumer practices that either directly absorb carbon or offset emissions significantly beyond what is generated. Unlike products that merely neutralise their footprint, climate-positive products contribute to a net reduction in atmospheric carbon, which is quantified using rigorous life cycle assessments (LCA) as outlined by standards like the GHG Protocol’s Product Standard .
In recent years, brands across various sectors have embraced this approach, using LCA to evaluate product emissions from raw materials to disposal. For instance, the food industry has seen companies implementing regenerative agricultural practices, which restore soil health, increase biodiversity, and sequester carbon, thereby converting farms into carbon sinks. In the consumer goods sector, companies are innovating with materials such as bio-based plastics and carbon-storing construction materials, which absorb more CO? over their lifetime than they emit during production and disposal.
领英推荐
Consumer willingness to pay a premium for climate positive products
However, creating climate-positive products is often more expensive, as it involves higher material and operational costs alongside extensive carbon offset investments. The central question, then, is whether consumers are willing to absorb these costs. Research shows that while a majority of consumers express strong support for sustainable products, only a subset are prepared to pay a premium. Brands that clearly communicate the tangible benefits of climate-positive initiatives tend to resonate better with consumers. For instance, younger demographics, particularly Millennials and Gen Z, show a higher propensity to support brands they perceive as authentically committed to environmental causes.
Challenges and the future of climate-positive products
Despite consumer interest, companies face notable hurdles in making climate-positive products a mainstream choice. Beyond cost, these challenges include the complexities of tracking emissions across a product’s lifecycle and managing the environmental trade-offs that may arise. For example, climate-positive initiatives in agriculture may increase land or water usage, highlighting the need for companies to balance carbon goals with other environmental considerations.
Moving forward, several strategies can improve the viability and appeal of climate-positive products:
As the market for climate-positive products expands, companies that build strong consumer connections around their carbon-positive goals may enjoy a first-mover advantage. Success in this arena will require a commitment not only to rigorous carbon removal but also to transparency and a customer-centric approach. Brands that can effectively integrate sustainability into their products and communicate their environmental benefits will be able to engage consumers in their sustainability journey and are poised to capture the growing demand for climate-positive products.
Ultimately, the future of climate-positive products is promising but hinges on the willingness of consumers to support premium-priced products that contribute positively to the environment. As companies design products that go beyond carbon neutrality, widespread adoption depends on clear communication, regulatory support, and technological advances that reduce costs. With these elements in place, climate-positive products have the potential to move from niche markets to mainstream acceptance, supporting broader efforts to combat climate change and reach climate goals.?
Schedule a call with Plan A. Our experts are ready to discuss how your company can effectively integrate sustainability into the core of your business.?
Carbon Price ?
Consultant Technical Lead, Design Management, Transport Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Master Planning, Urban Design
1 天前There is no such thing as nature positive! Everything we do consumes resources and uses energy and creates waste!!
Consultant Technical Lead, Design Management, Transport Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Master Planning, Urban Design
1 天前You all deny that it is our activity , our manufacturing of products that we do not need that is the problem!!
penzioner at /
1 周Dear Lubomila, Your letter shows that the world is at a dead end. There is only one exit. Namely, the Bible explained 2000 years ago: "But the nations became wrathful, and your own wrath came .... and to bring to ruin those ruining the earth"?(Revelation 11:18). What more proof is for this promise and what beautiful future will come after that, we can talk about it, if you wish. With regards, Franc Rancinger, 0038641820525
Environmental Engineer | LCA | ESG | Sustainability | CSRD | Eu- Taxonomy
1 周Appreciate this concise and informative update Lubomila!!
Service & Process Design I Product & Content Development - EO & Nature Based Solutions at EOX, Conservation Finance with Pro-Natur & Network Partners, regenerative Innovation for SME
1 周Fantastic article, Lubomila Jordanova! However, rather than product tags, why not aim for transparency with indicators in EUR showing how much carbon or biodiversity has been preserved within the existing price? And the Initial changes don’t necessarily need to add costs or premiums for consumers. Instead, what if it became the norm for companies to allocate a small percentage—say 1% of revenue—to local nature-positive projects that store carbon? This wouldn’t raise product prices but could significantly boost a company’s reputation—potentially a more profitable outcome than simply adding costs. Solutions like with Pina Earth TheResponse already provide a strong foundation for this approach to name only two of the many agricultural solutions that are being used for models like this in the food industry but should be used by more and more industry types in the future.