Claude and Llama: Why should you care about another AI chatbot?
Midjourney generated image of AI chatbots Bard, Llama, ChatGPT and Claude

Claude and Llama: Why should you care about another AI chatbot?

In July 2023, AI startup Anthropic released Claude 2 in the UK and US and Meta and Microsoft announced Llama 2.

So why should you care if you already have access to ChatGPT or Google Bard??

At first glance, Claude 2 is similar to OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google Bard. All three respond to natural language prompts. However, Claude 2 can process the equivalent of 75,000 words in a prompt (100,000 tokens in AI-speak), meaning you could upload the entire Stephen King novel Carrie as a prompt. In comparison, Bard’s token limit is around 1,000 whilst ChatGPT 3.5’s is 4,096.?

That alone means Claude 2 is potentially incredibly powerful and indeed does well for document analysis and summarising long content (more of that later).?

Zuckenberg sees AI as critical to Meta’s growth and by releasing Llama 2 as open source, is weakening the competitive advantage of OpenAI and Anthropic. Any organisation can freely download Llama, build upon it and develop it to improve or extend its functionality. Llama could be the disruptor and expect to see it integrated in devices and services in the future. Llama 2 is trained on 2,048 tokens but as it is open source, it could be developed to work on more or less.

You can try out Llama 2 at Labs.Perplexity.ai without having to be a developer and download the source code.

Claude and Llama matter because they drive innovation and competition at Google and OpenAI. With Microsoft the main investor in OpenAI and Meta’s preferred partner, Microsoft are hedging their bets by working with both.

Here’s how I tested Claude 2 and Llama 2’s ability to analyse documents as a comparison test against Bard and ChatGPT.

Summarising long content

Semrush have released its “Future of Ecommerce 2023” report. It's full of insights but is 53 pages long. Why not use AI to summarise the key points to save time reading the whole thing and test the three main AI platforms at the same time?

No alt text provided for this image
Contents of SEMRush's 53 page ecommerce report

Here’s how the three AI platforms performed:

Bard...epic fail

Bard is not able to process PDFs (either uploaded or the hosted URL). When asked to summarise the key points from a URL of the PDF, the result was: “I'm not programmed to assist with that.”

No alt text provided for this image
Bard was unable to summarise the report

ChatGPT 2.0 with Code Interpreter plugin...disappointing

ChatGPT performed surprisingly poorly, particularly as I used the Code Interpreter plugin with the paid for 2.0 version. It stated “Unfortunately, the text extraction only covers the first part of the report due to the limitations of the current text extraction method. To generate a comprehensive summary, I would need to be able to parse the whole document.”?

No alt text provided for this image
ChatGPT 4 with code interpreter plugin performed less well than expected

It then attempted to summarise the report but only managed 5 points (and one of those was an assumption):

  1. The report is about the future of e-commerce and provides industry insights for 2023 and beyond.
  2. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused trends in e-commerce to evolve.
  3. In 2020, the e-commerce industry saw a massive boom as consumers moved their purchasing online for goods ranging from entertainment to groceries.
  4. As lockdown measures eased and vaccination programs were rolled out in 2021 and 2022, e-commerce growth continued, but at a slower pace.
  5. The report will presumably discuss predictions and trends for e-commerce in 2023 and beyond.

Claude 2...easily the best result so far

Claude parsed the whole report, understood it was on the future of ecommerce and summarised the document in 8 points. Pretty impressive!?

Here's the summary from Claude 2:

No alt text provided for this image
Good summary by Claude

  1. The ecommerce industry has seen continued growth even after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Trends suggest there is potential for more growth in 2023.
  2. Asian markets like India and the Philippines saw big increases in ecommerce traffic share from 2022 to 2023. Companies like Flipkart and Lazada that serve these markets saw huge growth rates.
  3. Mobile usage continues to rise in ecommerce, so a mobile strategy including apps is important. Shopping apps have higher conversion rates but also higher acquisition costs compared to other app categories.
  4. Direct traffic remains the top channel for ecommerce, but organic search and referral traffic are also key channels that should not be neglected.
  5. Social media, especially TikTok, is becoming more significant for ecommerce due to influencers and built-in shopping features. Ecommerce brands need a presence.
  6. AI and AR advances are changing ecommerce by enabling personalized experiences, improved operations, and enhanced customer service.
  7. Amazon remains the dominant player. While a major threat, it also presents opportunities for partnerships and selling products that succeed on the platform.
  8. Top products on Amazon include electronics, clothing, and office accessories. Shoppers are interested in Apple, dresses, gaming chairs, and more.

Llama 2 - the best performer

Llama quickly and accurately summarised the report as providing “insights into the current state of e-commerce, including trends, consumer behavior, and industry performance”.

No alt text provided for this image
The best summary was from Llama 2

It listed 10 key takeaway and pulled out the most relevant and insightful points better than Claude:

  1. Global e-commerce sales reached $4.9 trillion in 2022 and are expected to grow to $6.5 trillion by 2023, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17%.
  2. The top e-commerce markets worldwide are China, the United States, Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. These countries account for over 50% of global e-commerce sales.
  3. Mobile devices continue to drive e-commerce growth, with mobile commerce (m-commerce) sales reaching $2.3 trillion in 2022 and projected to reach $3.7 trillion by 2023.
  4. Social media platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok are becoming increasingly important for e-commerce businesses, with 71% of online shoppers using social media for product research and discovery.
  5. Influencer marketing is also gaining traction, with 57% of brands partnering with influencers to promote their products.
  6. Sustainability and environmental concerns are driving consumer behavior, with 70% of consumers willing to pay more for sustainable products.
  7. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies are being used by e-commerce companies to personalize customer experiences, improve supply chain management, and optimize pricing strategies.
  8. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of e-commerce, particularly in categories such as grocery and healthcare.
  9. Cross-border e-commerce is growing rapidly, with Asia-Pacific countries leading the way. However, logistics and payment challenges remain significant barriers to cross-border trade.
  10. The future of e-commerce will be shaped by emerging technologies such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and voice assistants.

Overall, the report suggests that e-commerce continues to experience rapid growth and evolution, driven by changing consumer behaviors, advances in technology, and the rise of new markets.

Free to use - so why not try Claude 2 or Llama 2?

In my simple test, Llama came out on top when asked to summarise long content. Other reports suggest Llama is as good as ChatGTP 3.5 for content and idea generation. However, it has been released as an open source model for developers so unless you are a developer, you will be relying on free websites that have deployed it. Claude, ChatGPT and Bard are easier to try out.

Like Bard and ChatGPT 3.5, Claude 2 is free to use. All you need to do is sign-up with an email address or Google account. You don't need to be technical or understand AI to use these tools. You just need to be curious!

For the full power of ChatGPT, version 4 costs $20 per month. ChatGPT 3.5 is free but doesn’t have the power of plugins and the code interpreter.

They are all better than Bard - unless you need up-to-date research

Bard can access the internet to retrieve information. This gives it a big advantage over Claude 2, Llama 2 and ChatGPT which cannot and therefore their knowledge is limited to the data they have been trained on (ChatGPT 4 was able to access the internet until recently, when OpenAI removed the featured, apparently because people were using it to access information behind paywalls).?

However, in my experience Bard is more prone to making up responses (“AI hallucinations”) than Claude 2 or ChatGPT and less likely to give you the response you really want. Bard feels like work in progress, whilst Claude 2 is more complete and therefore a good alternative to ChatGPT for some tasks.?

What's good for today may not be good for tomorrow

OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta and Google are constantly working on their AI solutions. Claude and Llama matter if for no other reason than it offers competition to Open AI and Google.

With each new release, the features and capabilities of AI chatbots change and improve. Whilst Llama and Claude outperformed ChatGPT and Bard at summarising long documents today, that may change tomorrow.

Who knows, maybe Google will finally come good with Bard so its worth experimenting with a couple of platforms rather than sticking to one.

#bard #chatgpt #claude #claude2 #claudeai #bardai #openai #anthropic #aichatbots #claude2 #claudeai


要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了