Civil Rule 9(b) A Brief :  Prosecuting Bank Fraud & Judicial Misconduct in the District of N.J. & the Southern District of New York

Civil Rule 9(b) A Brief : Prosecuting Bank Fraud & Judicial Misconduct in the District of N.J. & the Southern District of New York

Memorandum of Law:?

?

?STATE OF MIND F.R.C.P. 9(b)

The Second Circuit has held that Rule 9(b) requires fraud Complaints to allege facts that lead to a “Strong Inference” that the Defendant has the requisite state of mind

The language of the second sentence of Rule 9(b) is simple: “Malice, Intent, Knowledge, and other conditions of a person’s mind may be alleged, generally. F.R.C.P. 9(b).

?

A Dishonorable Judge ?and several ?Co-Conspirator lawyers all had the requisite state of mind as licensed lawyers.

?They violated all ethics and ?Laws ?in pursuit of stealing a ?beautiful home via a Fraudulent Home Foreclosure!? They were caught in action by the Homeowner!? ?

The Judge concealed his knowledge of the Contested Fraudulent Home foreclosure; ?blatantly writing a very ?Unethical Order and stating in the Order he was deeming

all the Opposition filings & the Motion to Vacate as “Non-Contesting”? and He nefariously, transferred the Case to the Office of Foreclosure!? That’s Judicial Misconduct, Home Foreclosure Fraud, Abuse of Judicial Power and severe Corruption in the New Jersey Superior Court.?

?

The New Jersey Supreme Court holds the power to eradicate the evils and corruption in the lower court!? For which, several Federal lawsuits were filed with hundreds of Supporting? Material Fact Exhibits including? 4 years of? Payments and Mortgage Statements and the critical? 1098 IRS Mortgage Interest Statements, proving, Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, the Fraudulent Home Foreclosure was fully contested by the Homeowner!?

?

The Judge and the lawyer ?willfully acted in concert together and? concealed their knowledge of the ?evidence of the Federal lawsuits and the Motion to Vacate the Fraud Home Foreclosure and the many Opposition filings on the N.J. Superior Court Docket.?

CONCLUSION

?A Dirty Judge and a Dirty Lawyer? Both acted in concert together,

??IN CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT HOME FORECLOSURE FRAUD!?

?

?

?The JUDGE LIED AND HAD THE REQUISITE STATE OF MIND FRCP 9 (b), as a lawyer and a Judge Controlling Home Foreclosures in the State of New Jersey CHANCERY EQUITY DIVISION!

?A STROKE OF FORTUNE and a little bit of luck:? ?THE HOMEOWNER HAS EXPERIENCE? IN CIVIL LITIGATION, CONSUMER LAW AND COMBATING ??BANK FRAUD

====================================END=======


要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sherry Scalercio-Isenberg的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了