Circular Human Flows [Circular Economy 2.7]
Alexandre Lemille
Managing Director - Anthesis Group (France); Advisory Board Member - African Circular Economy Network; Passionate & sharing content about Human-Nature Dynamics, Decolonization & Decentration
Enhancing Humans as an integral part of Circular Economic Flows.
This proposed Diagram will most probably evolve in the near future. The aim today is to open up the floor to discussions, views and co-creation approaches that will ensure an inclusive Circular Economy is being designed within any markets. Our current linear model is anything but inclusive. And that is true everywhere, in developed markets as well as in the emerging ones.
A socially-embedded approach of a circular tomorrow is what we want.
Global Social Risks
As previously explained in these articles - "HumanSphere added", "HumanSphere Business Models" and "Inclusive Circular Models" - there is a strong belief that a social dimension would be needed as an integral part of the powerful Circular Economic framework to preserve and enhance human value.
In Circular Economy 2.0, a suggestion was made to eradicate both waste + poverty, where possible and at the same time. Both concepts do not exist in Nature. Both should be eradicated using the "Circular Thinking". There is a global recognition that the system - in which we live in - has been so far designed in a narrowed economic approach. Opening it up by embedding other dimensions may well be spurring genuine innovations.
Yet, while major risks - as listed in the Global Risks 2017 Report from the World Economic Forum - are for most of them interconnected with the social dimension (top three risks being inequality, social divides and job losses), socially related points of reference seem to be missing when deciding whether a future service or solution can be considered "Circular" or not. The Circular Economy will not fix it all, but one can try harder to ensure we will design it the best possible way towards a desired future for all. It is possible.
By applying the Golden Circular Rule - which starts by questioning whether our innovation will enhance environmental then human values – might generate unexpected findings in the way we will re-value the TechnoSphere.
Adapting the “Diagram”
Inserting a HumanSphere in-between the BioSphere and the TechnoSphere - in the so-called "Butterfly Diagram" from The Ellen McArthur Foundation - could help us rethink of the role of humans within these two cycles, the biological and technological nutrient ones. By doing so, it will help us pause and question ourselves whether we could position humans-as-flows or humans-as-resources, prior to look for answers in the technological spaces.
We know challenges out there are numerous, complex and multi-layered. Yet, if we create disconnects between corporate deciding on the way to design a product-of-services without the understanding of human needs, circular outcomes might not be the expected ones.
For once we have the opportunity to co-create something appealing to most. For once, we can all suggest ways to take advantages of a model that sees flows of energies and materials from a new angle. This system thinking approach could be highly flexible and distributed, well-enough to address our needs, any needs. A service-based model with modular financial approaches could better adapt to what we desire, while re-valuing manpower (Stahel). With this in mind, we could master the economy towards a thriving tomorrow, no longer be its victims.
In this "adapted Butterfly Diagram", one see the role of humans being integral to the flow of nutrients, resources and energies. We too are nutrients, resources and energies. We too form many flows. We could take advantage of these today.
Us and the Two Spheres
ADAPTATION: The arrow going towards the BioSphere might help us think at ways we could re-build our ecosystems by implementing adaptive strategies seeing ourselves as energies and resources. As explained in the book "Cradle-to-Cradle" from M. Braungart and W. McDonough, ants weight more that all humans, yet they re-build the BioSphere, so why can't we? Looking at own self as being part of the solution could change the nature of the debate: whether technologies will save us from climate disruptions, with, at the back of our mind, the exit solution as the final answer: the planet B…
EVOLUTION: The arrow coming from the BioSphere focuses on our own change of behaviour in our relation with environmental services. It is about evolution here as we will have to rethink about our interconnected role on and with planet Earth. We need to learn from Nature (the Biomimicry perspective) but, beyond this, we need to become an integral part of Nature - for real.
Both arrows (Adaptation & Evolution ones) in relation with the BioSphere are about humans and their interactions with the ecosystem. These rejuvenated exchanges should evolve to the benefit of both spheres - BioSphere and HumanSphere - moving us away from the current destructive relation: building on one another in beneficial ways, starting with the preservation of the natural capital.
VALORISATION: This arrow emphasizes the value humans represent as highly qualified labour serving the TechnoSphere. Valorisation is about the preservation of our stock of knowledge, education and skills that, put together, will keep improving the value of that sphere. Questioning ourselves about the abundance of human energies in innovative ways might help us see some positive outcomes of a growing world population, why not?
ADVANCEMENT3: Lastly, the fourth arrow is about this beneficial “advancement-within” as a result of the cross-fertilisation of exchanges created between the three spheres: decisions taken with human well-being as an integral part of a forthcoming economic framework would provide healthier access to our economy as well as experiences designed to fulfill our needs. In this advancement-within approach, there is a fair space for anyone to enjoy dedicated and value-based co-designed services (within the three dimensions at once: economic, social & environmental).
Feedback Loops to the HumanSphere
Feedback loops from the BioSphere and the TechnoSphere into the HumanSphere are numerous and virtuous. From the enhanced BioSphere, Humans will enjoy higher conditions conducive to life, as explained in biomimicry. From an evolving relation with flourishing environmental services, they will access better food and invigorated life conditions. From an enhanced TechnoSphere, Humans will be granted access to a preferred path towards further advancement enabling better life experiences.
With this approach, well-thought-of technological advances will generate safe and just benefits to most of us, in a desired future.
This graph is available here in English and here in French (Dropbox Links)
Linda Mu?oz Gallego
We are nature - stop destroying it
6 年Dear Alexandre - I have read your articles with great interest, and I like and support your vision about putting humans into the loops. However, I'm not sure I see the total picture, so excuse me for putting up a question. I'm really curious and will like to understand more of your thinking: Do you have an idea of how the economy should work on the practical level? My point is that in your articles on Optimizing Circular Value you have described how a company can "earn the right" to grow by going beyond the point zero of a problem (your red crosses in your sketches). But I'm not totally sure if you envision that a company still earns money in the usual way to pay the employees. So I guess I'm really asking this fundamental question: If a company still earns money, what prevents profit from running the game? You write: "Revenues and profits will be paid according to your ability to solve problems while advancing your economic model." But who decides and who pays? Is that a state authority or is it the customer crowd, or ??? Sorry, my question probably just demonstrates that I missed a point or two somewhere. Thanks a lot Lars
Independent Consultant Waste and Decentralised Waste Water Management
7 年Many Thanks Mr. Alexandre for your descriptive presentation of Inclusive Circular Economy. We would welcome your personal suggestions for present bad scenario in India for Waste Management and Global Circular Economy Monitors to presuurise the stakeholders in India to rethink and remodel their approach to utilise the huge poor uneducated scavengers and rag pickers, weho really matters in Waste Management Sector In India. The mechanisation, the skill development in these available manpower and systematic segregation, decent way of logistics, economical yet sustainable processing of all reusables and abolish Manual Scavenging will help the whole approach of Circular Economy. Now every waste generator must be resposible to discard the waste for ensuring its reuse in its best manner, otherwise face a severe penalty.
Unsustainability expert | ecological economist | complex systems thinker
7 年how comes that waste and poverty don't exists on nature??
Systems Entrepreneur helping Change Leaders make (systems) change easier. Founder and CEO @Regenerative Futures | Systems Innovation-as-a-Service | Creative Leader and Catalyst @Neol
7 年A very prescient examination of CE 2.0 which is much needed Alexandre. What will the human experience be without work? How do we find meaning and purpose? The inexorable shift to AI/driverless vehicles/robotics/CE/IoT will lead to a new kind of economy. The balance between people, planet and economy will have to be based on equity, social and environmental justice and a major repurposing and systemic design intent. Happy to continue the discussion with you to make this happen. Doug