The Chronicles of Cloud: The Service Model Saga

As Meghaduta sailed through the clouds, they encountered different lands, each with its own rules and offerings. These were the service models of cloud computing, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Meghaduta had to choose wisely, for their choice would shape their cloud experience and impact their business goals.

SaaS: The Land of Convenience

The first land they reached was SaaS, the land of convenience. Here, everything was ready-made and easy to use. The inhabitants of SaaS offered Meghaduta various software applications, such as email, CRM, and ERP, that they could access over the internet, without having to install or manage anything. Meghaduta was tempted by the simplicity and affordability of SaaS, but they also realized that they had little control or customization over the software. They wondered if SaaS could meet their specific needs and comply with their security and regulatory standards.

When SaaS is optimal: SaaS can be an optimal option for cloud computing when the user needs a standard and simple solution that does not require much customization or integration. SaaS can also be ideal for users who want to reduce the upfront and operational costs of software, as well as the hassle of installation and maintenance. SaaS can provide users with access to the latest features and updates, as well as the scalability and reliability of the cloud.

PaaS: The Land of Creativity

The next land they visited was PaaS, the land of creativity. Here, everything was designed to inspire and enable. The dwellers of PaaS provided Meghaduta with platforms and tools to develop, deploy, and run their own applications, without having to worry about the underlying infrastructure. Meghaduta was impressed by the flexibility and productivity of PaaS, but they also understood that they had to rely on the platform provider for security, availability, and scalability. They questioned if PaaS could support their complex and diverse workloads and integrate with their existing systems.

When PaaS is optimal: PaaS can be an optimal option for cloud computing when the user needs a customized and agile solution that can be developed and deployed quickly and easily. PaaS can also be ideal for users who want to focus on the application logic and functionality, rather than the infrastructure and platform management. PaaS can provide users with access to a variety of development tools and frameworks, as well as the elasticity and performance of the cloud.

IaaS: The Land of Freedom

The final land they explored was IaaS, the land of freedom. Here, everything was customizable and configurable. The residents of IaaS offered Meghaduta the basic building blocks of cloud computing, such as servers, storage, and networks, that they could provision and manage as they wished. Meghaduta was attracted by the control and scalability of IaaS, but they also acknowledged that they had to take full responsibility for the maintenance, security, and optimization of their infrastructure. They wondered if IaaS could deliver the performance and reliability they needed and justify the cost and effort they invested.

When IaaS is optimal: IaaS can be an optimal option for cloud computing when the user needs a flexible and scalable solution that can be tailored to their specific requirements and preferences. IaaS can also be ideal for users who want to have complete control and visibility over their infrastructure and platform, as well as the ability to migrate their existing systems to the cloud. IaaS can provide users with access to a range of infrastructure resources and services, as well as the cost-effectiveness and availability of the cloud.

On-Premises: The Land of Tradition

Before leaving the clouds, Meghaduta looked back at their home, the land of tradition. Here, everything was familiar and stable. Meghaduta owned and operated their own IT infrastructure, which they had built and refined over the years. Meghaduta was comfortable with the security and compliance of their on-premises systems, but they also recognized that they had to bear the high capital and operational expenses, as well as the risks of obsolescence and downtime. They wondered if their on-premises systems could keep up with the changing demands and expectations of their customers and stakeholders.

When on-premises is optimal: On-premises can be an optimal option for cloud computing when the user needs a secure and compliant solution that meets their specific regulatory and industry standards. On-premises can also be ideal for users who want to have full ownership and control over their data and systems, as well as the ability to customize and optimize their infrastructure and platform. On-premises can provide users with access to a dedicated and reliable IT environment, as well as the familiarity and stability of their legacy systems.

Hybrid: The Land of Harmony

As Meghaduta sailed further, they discovered another land, a land where different clouds coexisted in harmony. This was the land of hybrid, where SaaS could be extended through PaaS or IaaS, or seamlessly integrated with on-premises systems. Meghaduta was intrigued by the versatility and balance of hybrids, but they also realized that they had to deal with the complexity and challenges of managing multiple environments. They wondered if hybrids could offer them the best of both worlds, or if it would create more problems than solutions.

When hybrid is optimal: Hybrid can be an optimal option for cloud computing when the user needs a solution that combines the benefits of different service models and environments, while mitigating their drawbacks. Hybrid can also be ideal for users who want to have the flexibility and choice to use the most suitable cloud service for each workload, as well as the ability to leverage their existing investments and resources. Hybrid can provide users with access to a diverse and dynamic cloud ecosystem, as well as the interoperability and consistency of a unified platform.

As the narrative of Meghaduta's journey unfolds, few more twists emerge, further complicating their quest for digital transformation.

Twist 1: Paradox of vendor choice

As Meghaduta explored the different lands of cloud computing, they encountered various vendors, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. Oracle and SAP were known for their ERP solutions, which Meghaduta used to manage their core business processes. Salesforce had the most market share in CRM, which Meghaduta used to manage their customer relationships. Workday was the leader in HRMS, which Meghaduta used to manage their human resources.

Meghaduta also considered the leading vendors in IaaS and PaaS, such as Amazon, Google, and Azure. These vendors offered a range of infrastructure and platform services, such as compute, storage, networking, databases, analytics, and development tools. Meghaduta was impressed by the capabilities and features of these vendors, but they also faced some challenges.

One of the challenges was how to extend their SaaS applications with PaaS or IaaS. Meghaduta wanted to enhance their SaaS applications with customizations, integrations, and analytics, but they had to decide which PaaS or IaaS vendor to use. They had two options: to use the same vendor as their SaaS provider, or to use a different vendor.

Using the same vendor as their SaaS provider had some advantages, such as easier integration, better performance, and lower latency. However, it also had some disadvantages, such as higher dependency, lower flexibility, and higher switching costs. Using a different vendor as their PaaS or IaaS provider had some advantages, such as more choice, more innovation, and lower lock-in. However, it also had some disadvantages, such as more complexity, more compatibility issues, and higher integration costs.

Twist 2: Extending SaaS with Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Meghaduta discovered that extending their Software as a Service (SaaS) applications with Robotic Process Automation (RPA) could significantly streamline their operations. RPA allowed them to automate routine transactions and processes that were previously manual, freeing up their workforce to focus on more strategic tasks. By deploying 'digital workers', they could ensure transactions were processed faster, more accurately, and without fatigue. These bots could be configured to interact with SaaS applications, capturing and interpreting applications for processing transactions, manipulating data, triggering responses, and communicating with other digital systems.

Twist 3: Fulfilling Custom Needs with Low-Code Rules Engine

The third twist in their saga was the realization that a low-code Business Rules Management Systems (BRMS) like Pega, Drools or Camunda could be a game-changer for fulfilling custom needs. BRMS's low-code platform allowed Meghaduta's team to rapidly develop applications with minimal coding, thanks to its visual tools and drag-and-drop interfaces. This approach not only accelerated development but also empowered business analysts and other non-technical staff to contribute to the application development process. With BRMS, they could define complex business rules and processes, automate decisions, and ensure compliance with organizational standards—all while maintaining the agility to adapt to changing business requirements.

Key Design Considerations for Cloud Service Extensions

In the realm of cloud services, extending the capabilities of existing SaaS applications or building new functionalities requires careful consideration of several key factors. Here are some design considerations that Meghaduta took into account:

1. UI-Based Extensions: For extensions that are UI-based, it is preferable to utilize the PaaS offered by the SaaS vendor. This ensures a consistent and seamless user interface experience, as the look and feel remain uniform across the original application and its extensions.

2. Closely Coupled Business Processes: When dealing with business processes that are closely coupled with SaaS applications, using the PaaS provided by the same SaaS vendor is advantageous. This approach simplifies integration and maintains coherence in the workflow.

3. Automation of Tasks and Backend Extensions: For automating tasks or extending backend functionalities, employing Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and rules engines can significantly reduce development time and enhance agility. These tools allow for the quick implementation of automated processes without extensive coding.

4. Loosely Coupled Extensions: In cases where loose coupling is required for extensions, especially for unique business requirements that demand complex custom development, opting for an independent PaaS or IaaS vendor may be more suitable. This allows for greater flexibility and customization potential.

5. Supplier Risk and Dependency: It is crucial to evaluate supplier risk and dependency when relying on cloud services. Organizations must consider contingency plans, backup sources, and the level of control they have over their cloud infrastructure to mitigate risks associated with supplier dependency.

6. Security and Compliance: Security and compliance are critical aspects of cloud integration. Prioritizing security protects sensitive business data and ensures compliance with data protection regulations. Implementing robust security measures such as encryption, multi-factor authentication, regular security audits, firewalls, and intrusion detection systems is essential to safeguard cloud integrations.

7. Leveraging Community Developers: The rise of community developers has become a pivotal aspect of modern software development. Encouraging active participation from the community can lead to more dynamic and innovative development of business logic. For businesses that require significant IT involvement to handle continuously changing scenarios, a Business Rules Management System (BRMS) like Pega or Drools can be an appropriate solution.?

By taking these considerations into account, Meghaduta was able to make informed decisions that aligned with their strategic goals and technical requirements, ensuring the successful extension and integration of their cloud services.

(1) What Is Hybrid Cloud: Definition, Key Features and Benefits - TechRepublic. https://www.techrepublic.com/article/hybrid-cloud/ .

(2) What is low code? A complete guide | Pega. https://www.pega.com/low-code .

(3) What is Robotic Process Automation (RPA)? | IBM. https://www.ibm.com/topics/rpa.https://www.inscribe.ai/robotic-process-automation .

(4) Maximize Business Efficiency with Advanced Business Rule Engine .... https://www.nected.ai/blog/business-rule-engine .

(5) Building custom UI capabilities | Pega. https://docs-previous.pega.com/user-experience/87/building-custom-ui-capabilities .

(6) Extend SaaS applications with a cloud native approach. https://docs.oracle.com/en/solutions/extend-saas-cloud-native/ .

(7) How to Negotiate with Suppliers and Reduce Dependency Risks - LinkedIn. https://www.dhirubhai.net/advice/3/what-risks-supplier-dependency-supply-chain .

(8) Cloud Integration: What It Is and How It Works | DigitalOcean. https://www.digitalocean.com/resources/article/cloud-integration .

(9) A guide to cloud security and compliance | Fix. https://fix.security/blog/a-guide-to-cloud-security-and-compliance .

(10) Security Integration in Cloud Computing– How to Do It & Why It Matters. https://v2cloud.com/blog/security-integration-in-cloud-computing .

(11) Loosely Coupled Scenarios - High Performance Computing Lens. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/latest/high-performance-computing-lens/loosely-coupled-scenarios.html .

(12) Business Process as a Service (BPaaS) vs Software as a Service (SaaS .... https://medium.com/thenewtechstack/business-process-as-a-service-bpaas-vs-software-as-a-service-saas-240b6101701b .

(13) Supplier Risk Management of cloud services for business continuity. https://www.databarracks.com/blog/supplier-risk-management-of-cloud-services-for-business-continuity .

(14) Assessing cloud risk: The supply chain perspective | BCS. https://www.bcs.org/articles-opinion-and-research/assessing-cloud-risk-the-supply-chain-perspective/ .