A Christmas gift – how to easily save your firm money in 2024

A Christmas gift – how to easily save your firm money in 2024

Inter-company aka intra-group activity aka a transaction between two left hands of an FI. FIs only have left hands and with no exception that I know of, have many entities, perhaps even too many. Inter-company trades are one of the great career killers too; if anything goes wrong, there is nobody else to blame. They are also a root cause of complexity and cost.

My 2023 Christmas present to you is a full set of pointers as to how you can help your firm save money and increase controls. If you are a shareholder, a director of or a member of the group Exec in an FI, this is a topic worth asking questions about. Not totally free money, because you have to invest in some change, but all of it entirely within your own control.

I will add that this is not about Blockchain, although DLT technology might be a tool to use. The link to liquidity is a simple one; the more money you move in the real world, the more:

1.????????? Likely it is you use an intraday overdraft, which drives intraday liquidity buffers.

2.????????? Dependent you are on credit facilities from your Nostros.

3.????????? Costs you will have.

Please do let me know what you think of these notes. Feedback via the comments would be great. This is the last post of 2023; happy holidays and here’s to more things liquidity in 2024.


Want to know how?banks?really work? Maybe you are in a?FinTech, a?bank?or a?consulting?firm. Maybe trying to do something new.?Understanding how to make things work properly is a good investment of your time.

The Bankers’ Plumber’s Handbook is about how investment banking works, how to do operations?properly and keep control.?

The book tries to make it easy for you and includes a collection of real-life, true stories from 30+ years of adventures in banking around the world. True tales of Goldman Sachs and collecting money from the mob, losing $2m of the partners’ money yet still keeping my job and keeping an eye on traders with evil intentions.

So, you might like the tool kit, you might like the stories, or you might only like the glossary, which one of my friends kindly said was worth the price of the book on its own.?Or you might like all of it.

Go ahead, get your copy! https://lnkd.in/eac5zWBD


Banks are not consistently effective; a 2016 Guardian article highlighted how British banks account for about 25% of the GBP 252 billion, yes, billion, in conduct fines paid by the world’s top 20 banks in the previous five years. Yes, five years.

Banks are not efficient either. A now old CNBC report suggested that the banks had run out of jobs to cut and were now cutting compensation, deeming this a sign of efficiency.

Cutting jobs and then pay is simply dealing with the symptoms not the causes. The Banker’s Plumber knows a lot of people who work inside banks and not one of them could not offer up a thick book full of tales of inefficiency and general ineptitude.

So, I strongly disagree with having the words efficiency and banks in the same sentence. Banks have very poor processes and rarely, if ever, get around to doing the basics right.

My bet is that even a Tier II Investment Bank is spending $20 million per year more than it needs to on just one topic: liquidity reserves. Let’s try one simple test for Treasurers, CFOs, and COO types only:

1.????????? Does your bank group have multiple legal entities?

a.???????? If “No”, then “stop right there”. You are a lucky person. Just for giggles you might want to read the rest of this post to understand the pain your peers are suffering.

b.???????? If “Yes”, advance to question 2.

2.????????? Do these entities have a lot of transactions between them, so called inter-company transactions?

a.???????? If “No”, and on checking, you are really sure, then “stop right there”. You are a lucky person. Just for giggles you might want to read the rest of this post to understand the pain your peers are suffering.

b.???????? If “Yes”, advance to question 3.

3.????????? Do you fully understand the processes for the settlement of those transactions, in particular any cash flows?

a.???????? If “Yes”, please contact Arthur Daley at the? Winchester Club, who will make you a very good price for the ocean going vessel below.

b.???????? If “No”, read on.

Courtesy Arthur Daley Yacht Sales

Liquidity Costs Hurt - a real case study.

Names changed, simply with the hope that readers focus on the facts and not on whether they think they don’t have the same issues.

No Angel Bank is a tier II IB in the top quartile of FX players.

In FX

It is a direct Settlement Member in CLS. It actively uses standard front-office utilities such as NetLink and Harmony from Traiana. It has used its off-the-shelf CLS processing platform to internally net many FX trades between about a half dozen of its legal entities. It even processes non-CLS FX inter-company trades on that same engine in a number of non-CLS currencies. Some 40% of the volume on that platform is inter-company. This is all very high volume, virtually zero touch processing. Per ticket Operations costs for inter-company trades are below $0.05 per trade.

In other products

It uses its offshore operations team to manually bi-laterally net other inter-company cash flows. There are separate efforts for FX related business and other derivatives. A manual effort, but labour is cheap; some $30 per hour, fully loaded.

All in all No Angel Bank would seem to be quite efficient. Nobody is driving hard for any further process optimisation. Then the Treasurer decides he needs to allocate the costs for intraday liquidity; the reserves specifically needed to ensure the day’s obligations can be met. In volume terms this is very roughly 10% of gross cash paid out. This runs into the low double digit billions for Angel Bank at a cost of between $100 and $120 million per year.

Those costs are allocated out to businesses, with share of payment volume the key to who pays what. One very big slice of that cost cake lands in the lap of the COO for FX. The COO is well informed about his operational processes and knows all the facts cited above. But, the $20 million charge is a big dent in annual P&L. Are they doing the right things and are they doing those things right?

A deep dive into actual cash movements

No Angel Bank has some very good data on its daily cash movements. Forced by the PRA to report on Intraday Liquidity Monitoring (see BCBS 248), it is already collecting real time data on actual movements intraday and matching these to expected movements.

Not wanting to “boil the ocean”, detailed analysis started with just one day’s actual movements. Two key observations emerge:

Macro: Even with the CLS processes in FX and the bi-lateral netting mentioned above, some ?rd of all the cash moving is inter-company.

Micro: looking at one particular entity pair revealed how ineffective and inefficient the processes actually are. On that day, there was activity in 9 currencies between the two. So in a perfect world, 9 would be the minimum and the optimum number of cash movements. Now, if we allow for some timing issues, we might be generous and say 12 was the target. How many movements were made? Just over 60. 5x the optimal number. In terms of actual cash, in one currency Entity A paid B some $250 million, which could have impacted A’s intraday overdraft and with that its liquidity buffer. The same day, B paid A some $600 million, which affected B’s intraday overdraft and with that its liquidity buffer.

Lessons Learned:?No Angel Bank was incurring avoidable costs on two fronts.

Firstly, transaction costs paid to the nice folk at the global transaction banks for Nostro services; the usual suspects of JP Morgan, Barclays, HSBC, Citi, Deutsche et al. In this case, about $500k each year in avoidable Nostro transaction costs. For an IB, that is a small number.

More impressive was the potential impact on liquidity costs. Now cause and effect is an imperfect science, but with that said, the potential here was in the order of magnitude of $20 million per year. Even the Treasury controllers thought this was realistic.

$500k was actually enough to pay for the project and development work to enforce one single settlement standard for all inter-company cash flow.? This could be achieved with some custom work to an existing platform. Break even in one year with a free call option on that potential $20mm.

No Angel Bank is really quite efficient in FX specifically and inter-company netting generally. Yet, they did not have to dig deep to find room for improvement. They found all this potential in under 3-man months of effort.

Chorus: “Banks are neither efficient nor effective. Let’s get back to basics!”

Thanks for reading.

If you would like to talk more about things liquidity, please just type: “Can we talk?” into the comments box.

I am a long-time and long-in-the-tooth hawk on matters liquidity. I work closely with a great team of people at Planixs where I am the Liquidity Futurologist. Planixs is in the business of making sure FS firms can avoid what happens when liquidity dries up aka the right tool set. I hope that together we can make liquidity sexy.?

Please feel free to get in contact: https://www.dhirubhai.net/in/bankersplumber/ and [email protected].


Liquidity matters. I recently taught a course on Intraday Liquidity Management, or as I prefer to title it: Real-Time Liquidity Management. The materials are available here.

If you are interested in matters of liquidity, the materials are available to download. It’s a lot cheaper than the course and you can go at your own pace. This was 10 hours of teaching and 130 slides.

Now it’s not the same as listening to my dulcet tones for a few hours and not as interactive as covering the materials with your fellow students, but it’s a pretty good set of materials. In particular, it shares some views on how important operational capabilities are; those are the things which drive your ability to manage your business today, making you ready for any storms and disruptions. Tuning those capabilities is a valuable thing across the board in wholesale banking, for sell-side to buy-side to corporates.

If you’d prefer to have me come and talk about real-time liquidity management to you and your team, or to your clients. please just get in contact.

Click here for the materials.


#Liquidity #LiquidityManagement #LiquidityMatters #FinancialServices?#RegulatoryConfidence

Nick Nicholls

Collateral management - operational risk and control - real time cash and liquidity management - liquidity risk management and reporting - SME / PM. Chartered MCSI.

11 个月

Great fun read - thanks Olaf. May I add - cutting costs for cost cutting alone has no positive bearing on efficiency

Simon Bennett

Program Recovery | Target Operating Model | Digital Business Architecture | Technology Implementation

11 个月

Plus the massive amount of Intercompany rec breaks which create signal/noise ratio problems ….

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Olaf Ransome的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了