China won the first round of biological warfare. Is India rising up for the second round?

Forget cricket and watching Hollywood, Bollywood, Tollywood, and other woods.?Indians should instead train in Virology, conventional warfare, and strategic geographic ambitions.?China won the first round of biological warfare with 2020 virus and 2021 virus + lung fungus strategy. China is fully equipped to fight the sequel. According to Vedic science you need a strong Ksatriya (warrior) class. Without that you cannot pursue the devotional activities needed to liberate the soul from material world. If you need examples, look at Israel's growth from a new nation-state to a dominant force in AI, electronics, agriculture, etc.

Historical Wars:

"In 1962, the world’s two most populous countries went to war against one another in a pair of remote, mountainous border regions. In less than a month, China dealt India a devastating defeat, driving Indian forces back on all fronts. Along with breaking hopes of political solidarity in the developing world, the war helped structure the politics of East and Southeast Asia for generations."

"China may also have wanted to establish itself as the preeminent power in the region by giving India a bloody nose. The Cuban Missile Crisis provided a convenient (and completely unexpected) distraction, as both superpowers were more worried about each other than what the Chinese and Indians were doing at the moment. Finally, China also faced domestic discontent associated with the disastrous failure of the Great Leap Forward. Mao Zedong lost some control over domestic policy, but retained substantial control over foreign and military policy; a quick victory increased his prestige and power within the CCP."

China’s Grand Strategy and Civilizational Ambitions

"In the Chinese language, China is called 中国 (Zhōngguó) or the Middle Kingdom. In civilisational terms, it means that China is at the centre of the world, emphasising the superiority of Chinese civilisation and centrality of nationalism to her domestic and foreign policies, despite Marxist doctrines that consider civilisation and nationalism as false consciousness. The ancient Sino-centric order, called 天下 (Tiānxià) or All Under Heaven, divided the world into three parts – the Middle Kingdom, the tributaries and the barbarians (Kissinger 2011). The countries that accepted the superiority of the Chinese order by offering homage and gifts to the Chinese emperor, also called the Son of Heaven, were given the status of tributaries. They received benefits of trade and non-aggression from China. However, the countries antagonistic to the Chinese order were considered serious threats by China and were termed as barbarians. Chinese military strategies have always been oriented towards countering threats from the barbarians (Johnston 1995). The Communist Party-state does not disown this civilisational understanding of international relations (IR)."

"In the contemporary context, the discourse on hierarchical international order based on civilisation seems politically incorrect. Nevertheless, mainstream IR theory also contains terms such as unipolar moment, hegemonic stability, regional hegemon, great powers and spheres of influence. The only difference is that these terms denote superiority of military- economic hard power, not civilisational?soft power, while the Chinese concept of power, measured by Comprehensive National Power (CNP), denotes hard as well as soft power (Pillsbury 2000). The last four decades of China’s economic rise has not been devoid of the civilisational or soft power element. It has been accompanied by the Sinicisation process in Asia, i.e. increase of China’s ability to influence other countries (Katzenstein 2012). Thus, the emergence of China as the predominant power in Asia does not only mean reordering of power structure but also a civilisational transformation from Westernisation to Sinicisation (Katzenstein 2012)."

"Besides the international dimension, China’s grand strategy also has a domestic dimension, viz. continual economic growth and political stability, ensuring the legitimacy of the Party-state. Unlike democratic systems, in which legitimacy of the government is based on periodic, free and fair elections and peaceful transfer of power, if the government is defeated, the Party-state system in China gets its legitimacy from the awe and reverence of the people. Since ancient times, the Chinese state has stood for certain virtues, viz. truth, benevolence and glory, which legitimise its existence (Shue 2004). But whenever the state has been unable to sustain these virtues, due to natural calamities, foreign aggression or incompetence of the ruling dynasty, there have been rebellions, which have led to end of the dynasty and emergence of new dynasties. Ultimately one of them has succeeded in reuniting China. This concept is called the Mandate of Heaven. ‘The empire long united must divide, long divided must unite; this is how it has always been’ (Romance of the Three Kingdoms)."

"One point to consider is that just as India became Westernized because of Western hegemony it is natural to suppose that unless India reverts to its own culture then we can expect to see a?Sinicization of India as?Chinese?values and culture become prominent. In some ways this may be good because of the similarities between Indian and?Chinese?culture because?China?itself has been culturally influenced by India for millennia. One thing that is radically different however between current Westernized India and?China?is that India has adopted Western democracy whereas?China?has an authoritarian government that is ostensibly “communist” but jokingly called “Red Capitalists” and has evolved into an authoritarian capitalist system like Singapore but on steroids. And with “Emperor” Xi Jinping making himself president for life we see a gradual return to a monarchical system which of course is the traditional?Chinese?model. It is also the traditional Indian model. Could the Sinicization of India plant the seeds for casting off democracy (which has not worked well in India under former corrupt governments)? Seeing how?China?has catapulted to the forefront of world power in such a short time under an authoritarian government may be an incentive to some power brokers in India to follow suit. That would have a major positive impact on our preaching. Time will tell."

Let's examine the article from prestigious economic times...

"Amidst the deadly and devastating second Corona wave, India is abuzz with a conspiracy theory suggesting a hidden Chinese hand behind the 2nd Covid wave to avenge its embarrassment in Himalayan heights resulting from the nine-month-long battle..."

Lessons learnt from first round of biological warfare that China leashed upon India.

China may be already in the middle of executing its plans if one is to refer to the recent ZeeTV news

"One BGI study, for instance, used a military supercomputer to re-analyze NIFTY data and map the prevalence of viruses in Chinese women, look for indicators of mental illness in them, and single out Tibetan and Uyghur minorities to find links between their genes and their characteristics." Complete article is below.

Could China be developing biological weapons that target specific genetic populations? Here is a short video on the subject...

?“They’re pursuing weapons similar to some of the nuclear-powered delivery systems that the Russians have been pursuing.”

"Ambassador Robert Wood, the U.S. envoy to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, said China hasn't developed or been able to weaponize the technology yet. But his comments suggested that China is interested in such so-called “exotic nukes" like nuclear-powered underwater drones and nuclear-powered cruise missiles being developed by Russia."

It does not end with DNA analysis and Virus/Biological warfare. Other techniques such as EMPs, which "use low-yield nuclear weapons detonated in the atmosphere to create a wave of energy that fries electronic equipment and may knock out the power grid."

China also needs people to execute the global ambitions. So it is now allowing people to have more children.

Implications for India:

India is not dealing with a trivial adversary. In order to win, India needs to focus all its energies in containing Chinese growing influence. Else it will risk being marginalized, attacked, occupied and citizens will suffer even more than what they did under the Chinese Coronavirus. India can ally with other countries such as USA, U.K., etc., in this dangerous war with China. Without a strong country there is no strong religion. Without strong religion there will be a stagnation of devotional activities. If devotion stagnates then there is little hope for devotional emancipation. The time is now. Look higher than Cricket and Bollywood. Your very existence may be threatened. Will Indians act?

References:

1. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/view-is-indias-second-covid-wave-chinas-biological-war-against-india/articleshow/82676401.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst