ChatGPT vs Gemini; Uncertainty Quantification in GenAI; GPT-4 vs. GPT-4V vs. Humans On Abstraction and Reasoning; Private vs Public LLMs; and More.
Photo by Author using Gemini

ChatGPT vs Gemini; Uncertainty Quantification in GenAI; GPT-4 vs. GPT-4V vs. Humans On Abstraction and Reasoning; Private vs Public LLMs; and More.


Editor's Paper Recommendations

Advancements in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of GANs, GPT, Autoencoders, Diffusion Model, and Transformers: The launch of ChatGPT has garnered global attention, marking a significant milestone in the field of Generative Artificial Intelligence. While Generative AI has been in effect for the past decade, the introduction of ChatGPT has ignited a new wave of research and innovation in the AI domain. This surge in interest has led to the development and release of numerous cutting-edge tools, such as Bard, Stable Diffusion, DALL-E, Make-A-Video, Runway ML, and Jukebox, among others. These tools exhibit remarkable capabilities, encompassing text generation and music composition, image creation, video production, code generation, and even scientific work. They are built upon various state-of-the-art models, including Stable Diffusion, transformer models like GPT-3 (recent GPT-4), variational autoencoders, and generative adversarial networks. This advancement in Generative AI presents a wealth of exciting opportunities and, simultaneously, unprecedented challenges. Throughout this paper, we have explored these state-of-the-art models, the diverse tasks they can accomplish, their challenges, and the promising future of Generative Artificial Intelligence.

Comparing Humans, GPT-4, and GPT-4V On Abstraction and Reasoning Tasks: We explore the abstract reasoning abilities of text-only and multimodal versions of GPT-4, using the ConceptARC benchmark [10], which is designed to evaluate robust understanding and reasoning with core-knowledge concepts. We extend the work of Moskvichev et al. [10] by evaluating GPT-4 on more detailed, one-shot prompting (rather than simple, zero-shot prompts) with text versions of ConceptARC tasks, and by evaluating GPT-4V, the multimodal version of GPT-4, on zero- and one-shot prompts using image versions of the simplest tasks. Our experimental results support the conclusion that neither version of GPT-4 has developed robust abstraction abilities at humanlike levels.

Chain-of-Note: Enhancing Robustness in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models: Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) represent a substantial advancement in the capabilities of large language models, notably in reducing factual hallucination by leveraging external knowledge sources. However, the reliability of the retrieved information is only sometimes guaranteed. Retrieving irrelevant data can lead to misguided responses and cause the model to overlook its inherent knowledge, even with adequate information to address the query. Moreover, standard RALMs often need help to assess whether they possess adequate knowledge, both intrinsic and retrieved, to provide an accurate answer. When knowledge is lacking, these systems should ideally respond with "unknown" when the answer is unattainable. In response to these challenges, we introduce Chain-of-Noting (CoN), a novel approach aimed at improving the robustness of RALMs in facing noisy, irrelevant documents and in handling unknown scenarios. The core idea of CoN is to generate sequential reading notes for retrieved documents, enabling a thorough evaluation of their relevance to the given question and integrating this information to formulate the final answer. We employed ChatGPT to create training data for CoN, which was subsequently trained on an LLaMa-2 7B model. Our experiments across four open-domain QA benchmarks show that RALMs equipped with CoN significantly outperform standard RALMs. Notably, CoN achieves an average improvement of +7.9 in EM score given entirely noisy retrieved documents and +10.5 in rejection rates for real-time questions outside the pre-training knowledge scope.

Uncertainty Quantification Using Generative Approach: We present the Incremental Generative Monte Carlo (IGMC) method, designed to measure uncertainty in deep neural networks using deep generative approaches. IGMC iteratively trains generative models, adding their output to the dataset, to compute the posterior distribution of the expectation of a random variable. We provide a theoretical guarantee of the convergence rate of IGMC relative to the sample size and sampling depth. Due to its compatibility with deep generative approaches, IGMC is adaptable to both neural network classification and regression tasks. We empirically study the behavior of IGMC on the MNIST digit classification task.

--

Are you looking to advertise a product, job opening, or event to an audience of over 40,000 AI researchers and engineers? Please reach out to us on?LinkedIn?to explore your options.

Enjoy the newsletter? Help us make it bigger and better by sharing it with colleagues and friends.

--

Industry Insights

?

Growth Zone

?To Recover from Burnout, Regain Your Sense of Control

?

Expert Advice


Exciting developments in the AI field! Can't wait to dive into these topics. ?? Danny Butvinik

Exciting topics to delve into! Can't wait to read more. ??

Balakrishna Reddy? ??

Founder & CEO at FlowAI | Transforming Industries with AI Innovation | Talent Acquisition Manager at a Leading US Firm ????? Elevating Tomorrow: Innovating with Purpose in the Realm of Cutting-edge Technology Solutions.

7 个月

Thank you for sharing.

Bren Kinfa ??

Follow for AI & SaaS Gems ?? | Daily Content on Growth, Productivity & Personal Branding | Helping YOU Succeed With AI & SaaS Gems ??

7 个月

Exciting exploration ahead! ??

Digvijay Singh

?I help Businesses Upskill their Employees in Data Science Technology - AI, ML, RPA

7 个月

As a curious mind, I'm eager to learn more about the latest in AI and machine learning. Can you share any practical applications of these advancements in real life scenarios?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了