ChatGPT – the Solution Architect of the Future?
A post by Pascal Espinouse made me ask the question whether an AI model like ChatGPT could someday replace us architects working in information technology. If you don’t have the time to read through my views here is my short answer: AI models, like ChatGPT have the potential to help and assist an architect. However, today AI models like ChatGPT are not advanced enough to replace an architect, as designing the “right” solution requires complex decision-making, planning, and problem-solving.
What is involved in architecting a solution?
As architects we design solutions by applying methods and techniques combined with technical expertise:?“The architect has a responsibility for ensuring the completeness (fitness-for-purpose) of the architecture, in terms of adequately addressing all the pertinent concerns of its stakeholders; and the integrity of the architecture, in terms of connecting all the various views to each other, satisfactorily reconciling the conflicting concerns of different stakeholders, and showing the trade-offs made in so doing.”[1]
The actual solution design process will follow a similar pattern to that of a creative technology design process[2]. An architect will combine and group the different components together according to stakeholder group and will, over several sessions, develop concept views related to key architectural components, establishing different options. Using an architecture framework like IAF (integrated architecture framework) will help with a pre-defined set of artefacts that are required to establish a logical and a physical design.
Deciding the “right” option will mean balancing the various criteria like functionality, value for money, compliance, quality, and sustainability. IT architecture design involves complex decision-making, planning, and problem-solving that require human expertise and experience.
That is where most of the architect’s work is focused on – using knowledge and experience to research a particular subject, to apply design thinking and to solve problems to establish a solution.
The capability of our current AI tools
Our current AI capabilities and models like ChatGPT are language model designed to process natural language inputs and provide responses based on patterns in its training data. ChatGPT is based on a deep learning architecture called a transformer, which was introduced in a research paper called "Attention Is All You Need" in 2017.
The transformer architecture is designed to process and understand sequences of words or tokens, such as sentences or paragraphs, by using attention mechanisms that allow the model to focus on specific parts of the input. ChatGPT can be invoked by a user entering a question in natural language or by an application using and API (application program interface). The model generates a response based on its training data and learned patterns. ChatGPT has been trained on a massive corpus of text data, including books, articles, and websites, and it is able to generate responses on a wide range of topics (about 570GB of data).
And this is where an AI model like ChatGPT can really shine: “to understand natural language input and can provide answers to complex questions or engage in a conversation on a given topic. Its strength lies in its[3] “ability to learn from large amounts of data and adapt to different contexts, making it a versatile tool for a wide range of applications.”[4]
The main limitations of an AI model like ChatGPT
Whilst there are many impactful use cases where an AI model like ChatGPT can make a real impact, there are several key limitations :
领英推荐
ChatGPT as a Solution Architect
Let’s get to the actual question of this short article – what activities, if any, could an AI model like ChatGPT take over. ?As outlined above as well as in my last AI article, all current AI models are so-called “limited memory” models that are considered as “narrow AI” oppose to “strong AI”. In summary, the main difference is that Narrow A is an application of AI to enable a system to replicate human intelligence for a dedicated purpose. Strong AI is referred to as artificial general intelligence (AGI) which is based on self-aware systems, which is still unachievable with today’s technology. This means that an AI model like ChatGPT cannot be used to when emotional intelligence, understanding context or where real-world experience is needed. Instead, AI models like ChatGPT could help a Solution Architect with:
Summary
AI tools and models like ChatGPT, Bing AI, Bard, etc are already making a big impact. With the imminent release of GPT-4 it is likely that the accuracy and value will be further improved, which will help architects designing solutions across the information technology sector. However, whilst AI can assist an architect, it cannot replace an architect, as the role of an architect
Thanks for Reading & Thanks to ChatGPT for its support in developing this article
[2] University of Twente, A Design Process for Creative Technology, https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/a-design-process-for-creative-technology
[3] All according to ChatGPT – I asked: "what are the main limitations of ChatGPT?"
[4] I asked ChatGPT “what is the main strength of ChatGPT?”
Hi Gunnar, This is a great article, thanks for sharing; I can see has prompted a lot of good discussion. There are some nuances worth mentioning: - ChatGPT & GPT4 both appear to exhibit 'Theory of mind' which means that they are more than a 'narrow AI' system. I demo'ed this on an internal presentation earlier today. A useful reference on this is https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.12712.pdf - Whilst there is a lack of memory to learn from one session to another, so it cannot learn new things, there are ways of supplementing its knowledge base, as illustrated by Bing Chat and Office Copilot and the Embedding API. - A key limiting factor of GPT4 and other generative AI is that they may be great at 'incremental tasks' but not 'discontinuous tasks' where there is no sequence of steps to the goal.
Chief Digital Officer. I work with People and harness Digital, Data & AI to enable a step change in results
1 年Seems to me that it can already take on the proverbial 'Co-Pilot' role for an Architect. In the near future I think the role of the experience Architect is safe, but it will be harder and harder for junior Architects (and for that matter Lawyers, Accountants, Developers, Testers etc etc) to gain the hours to become 'experienced' Architects.... Those of us with 20+ years experience are lucky and will be busy for as long as we want. Those still at School or University need to think or even rethink what their careers might be!
CEO of Financial Services SBU and Chairman APAC SBU at Capgemini | Member of the Group Executive Board
1 年Further evidence that AI cannot replace the human element. Great write-up, Gunnar
Senior Director - Banking and Financial Services at Cognizant
1 年Have you tried answering this question using chatGPT?
Top Voice in AI | CIO at TetraNoodle | Proven & Personalized Business Growth With AI - In 4 Easy Steps | AI keynote speaker | 4x patents in AI/ML | 2x author | Travel lover ??
1 年Insightful analysis! AI can certainly enhance an architect's work, but ultimately, it is the architect's expertise, intuition, and artistic vision that are irreplaceable. How do you see the role of AI evolving in the future of IT?