ChatGPT, AI, Identity & Privacy
Guy Huntington
Trailblazing Human and Entity Identity & Learning Visionary - Created a new legal identity architecture for humans/ AI systems/bots and leveraged this to create a new learning architecture
Risk
The other day, I typed in my name, Guy Huntington, into ChatGPT. The only thing I got was information on a now deceased Guy Huntington. When I typed in more information about me, it apologized and gave me some information about myself which was inaccurate. This is a simple example of risk.
If it's low risk about Guy Huntington, then it really doesn't matter if the information is accurate or not, if my permission was granted to release information about myself or whatever. Yet, as the risk rises, all of a sudden I'm going to want to give my consent to use information about me, and I want others to know I've given my consent. Today, on the planet, this framework doesn't exist.
YET, IT'S MUCH MORE COMPLICATED THAN THIS. Come with me on a short mental journey...
AI Leveraged Digital Versions of Us
Skim this article, ?“AI Leveraged Smart Digital Identities of Us”. It lays out a major paradigm shift as AI is leveraged to do things on our behalf, with much of it at medium and high risk levels. How will people, businesses, governments, et al be able to legally know it's your digital identity? Today on the planet, this framework doesn't exist.
YET, IT'S MUCH MORE COMPLICATED THAN THIS.
Which AI System Are You Interacting With?
Let's say Jane Doe is using an AI system to assist her in writing a report, or creating a presentation, or doing a health assessment on her, etc. How does she know it's the AI system it claims to be? Today, on the planet, this legal identity framework for AI systems doesn't exist.
YET, IT'S MUCH MORE COMPLICATED THAN THIS.
AI Systems, Bots & Hives
In the not so distant future, Jane could be a doctor in a modern hospital. She might be leveraging an AI enabled, smart digital identity of her to manage several patients while she works with someone else, interacting with a variety of different:
There's LOTS of personal, confidential information about her patients flowing between the "hive", her smart digital identity, and other hospital systems. IT'S HIGH RISK. Thus, the "hive" needs to be legally identified. YET, IT'S MUCH MORE COMPLICATED THAN THIS. Why?
Hive Membership
Membership of the hive might change slowly or, very quickly. IoT devices might be quickly leveraged into the hive. in the next 10-ish years, nanobots will come into existence to be leveraged in cell diagnosis and repair (skim this article). My points?
IT'S CRYING OUT FOR A RETHINK OF OUR ANTIQUATED LEGAL IDENTITY FRAMEWORKS AROUND THE PLANET
Which sadly almost no one is thinking about. Skim ?“AI & Governments”. IT'S VERY COMPLICATED AND POLITICAL. Why? Legal identity is frequently managed at local state/provincial levels. Thus, there are literally hundreds of jurisdictions around the planet to deal with.
The legal identity architecture I've created for AI systems, bots and humans allows for each jurisdiction to be in control, but work globally, instantly. Skim these docs:
YET, IT'S MUCH MORE COMPLICATED THAN THIS. Why?
Enforcement of Privacy is a Joke Today on the Planet
Why? THE CURRENT SUCCESS RATE OF PROSECUTING CYBERCRIME ON THE PLANET IS A PALTRY 0.05%. Criminals operate out of jurisdictions where they can't be easily prosecuted. So, while jurisdictions might huff and puff about creating new privacy and consent frameworks to protect us and our data from AI, it's not likely going to work well down at the enforcement level.
I've written about how trade agreements should be modified between partners allowing for cross-enforcement of legal identity and privacy laws and regulations.
YET, IT'S MUCH MORE COMPLICATED THAN THIS. Why?
Rate of Change Threatens Our Privacy
Look at this tech change diagram produced by my friend Pat Scannell. It shows a logarithmic rate of tech change, which we can no longer keep up with. If you watch this recent video, "The AI Dilemma" produced by "The Center for Humane Technology", they are talking about exponential on top of exponential change and an increasing ability to keep up with it.
Here's my main point - the rapid rate of change will increasingly render more useless the ability of our local laws and regulations to protect us. Which is why, in the legal identity architecture links above, it includes a new, global, well-funded, independent, non-profit.
It's job is to do 24x7x365 threat analysis against not only the tech used in legal identity for AI systems, bots and humans, BUT ALSO AGAINST THE GOVERNANCE, BUSINESS PROCESSES AND END USERS. It continually produces rated threat assessments. SO, A VERY HIGH THREAT MUST BE RESPONDED TO WITHIN HOURS BY GOVERNMENTS, COMPANIES, ENTERPRISES AND PEOPLE. This brings current industry best practices to the world of legal identity.
YET, IT'S MUCH MORE COMPLICATED THAN THIS. Why?
It Requires New Toolkits to Use
Skim this article, ?“TODA, EMS, Graphs – New Enterprise Architectural Tools For a New Age”. My point? Governments, companies and enterprises should be rethinking their internal architectures to get ready to deal with all the above i,e, new laws and regulations alone won't solve the problems.
YES IT'S DARNED COMPLICATED
I'm currently in discussions with a country to fund and deploy the architecture. Meanwhile, I do short-term C-suite consulting to get rapid transformation plans in place to prepare for the incoming tech tsunami waves. Contact me.
About Guy Huntington
I'm an identity trailblazing problem solver. My past clients include Boeing, Capital One and the Government of Alberta's Digital Citizen Identity & Authentication project. Many of my past projects were leading edge at the time in the identity/security space. I've spent the last eight years working my way through creating a new legal identity architecture and leveraging this to then rethink learning.
I've also done a lot in education as a volunteer over my lifetime.?This included chairing my school district's technology committee in the 90's - which resulted in wiring most of the schools with optic fiber, behind building a technology leveraged school, and past president of Skills Canada BC and Skills Canada.
I do short term consulting for Boards, C-suites and Governments, assisting them in readying themselves for the arrival of AI systems, bots and AI leveraged, smart digital identities of humans.
I've written LOTS about the change coming. Skim the?over 100 LinkedIn articles?I've written,?or my webpage?with lots of papers.
Quotes I REALLY LIKE!!!!!!:
Reference Links:
An Identity Day in The Life:
My Message To Government & Industry Leaders:
National Security:
Rethinking Legal Identity, Credentials & Learning:
Learning Vision:
Creativity:
AI Agents:
Architecture:
AI/Human Legal Identity/Learning Cost References
领英推荐
AI Leveraged, Smart Digital Identities of Humans:
CISO's:
Companies, C-Suites and Boards:
Legal Identity & TODA:
Enterprise Articles:
Rethinking Enterprise Architecture In The Age of AI:
LLC's & AI:
Challenges With AI:
New Security Model:
DAO:
Kids:
Sex:
Schools:
Biometrics:
Legal Identity:
Identity, Death, Laws & Processes:
Open Source:
Notaries:
Climate Change, Migration & Legal Identity:
Fraud/Crime:
Behavioral Marketing:
AI Systems and Bots:
Contract Law:
Insurance:
Health:
AI/AR/VR Metaverse Type Environments:
SOLICT:
EMP/HEMP Data Centre Protection:
Climate:
A 100,000-Foot Level Summary Of Legal Human Identity
A 100,000-Foot Level Summary Of The Learning Vision:
Digital Product Innovation & Strategy | Security and Identity
1 年Guy Huntington enjoying skimming through your articles - with respect to the intersection of ChatGPT and AI with privacy and DI - you might want to consider adding more specifics around how AutoGPT adds to the mix. ChatGPT had some restrictions built in related to internet access and web services / APIs - whereas AutoGPT now paves the way for deeper levels of automated data connectivity and enablement. If AutoGPT got access to quantum for instance, we'd pretty much have to say bye bye to a lot of existing "security".