Chapter 51: Modern grammar is a class war.
Chris West
Creator of Strategic Corporate Narratives for High-Agency Individuals | Brand & Organizational Design | "Weird to Wired": Bridging Tech and Human Connection | #1 Best-Selling Author - Org Alignment via One Voice
(This is an extract from STRONG LANGUAGE: THE FASTEST, SMARTEST, CHEAPEST MARKETING TOOL YOU'RE NOT USING.)
‘Some method should be thought on for…fixing our language for
ever.’
Jonathan Swift, 1712.
?
Language changes. Grammar evolves. Complaints about it,
however, appear to be constant.
I was taught my grammar at school 40 years ago. I was taught
it by someone who’d learnt their grammar 30 years before that.
Should I still be bound by the same conventions? Should I be
writing like someone speaking from before World War II? If
society moves on, shouldn’t language?
There are two kinds of rules in the world: those which exist to
codify something to keep it regular and the kind of rules which
exist to make sure everyone plays fair.
Sometimes I think that when people criticise others for not
following the rules of grammar, they’re actually upset that
someone seems to be cutting
corners and cheating.
Any rule of grammar exists only to help make our meaning
clear. I don’t believe it should be the other way around: we
shouldn’t change how we speak just to follow rules if doing so
would restrict our ability to make our content and our attitude
better understood.
Now, I can choose to ignore a rule of grammar if I believe that
following the rule would make what I’m saying less clear. For a
company, it’s more complicated.
What could be more soul-sapping to a CMO than to have to
stop all the other parts of the efforts to grow the company, just
to have a conversation about whether there should, or shouldn’t,
be a comma in a sentence?
This is why it’s critical to have all the levels of your brand voice
领英推è
clear at the beginning. Your language conveys more than just
its content. The language style you use also signals what you
stand for and the kind of world you believe in. Conservative
or progressive? Rule-bound or adventurous? Considerate or
gung ho? It’s those choices which should dictate how you codify
your grammar.
In Gulliver’s Travels, written by Jonathan Swift, Gulliver is confronted by a war between the Big Endians and the Little Endians. They were at war because they couldn’t agree on which end of the boiled egg you should crack open. It was a satire on religion. But there are equally dogmatic battles about grammar.
However, no grammar book I’ve ever read has addressed the
real issue that is swirling in the dark waters beneath the surface
of these arguments. Grammar is a class war: the ignorant
greengrocer is laughed at by the educated middle classes for not
knowing that he’s misplaced his apostrophe. But if we do that,
shouldn’t we also be laughing at the middle-class professional
who peppers their report with exclamation marks to emphasise
the presence of their weak jokes? When you swim in these dark
waters, you can catch your foot on a shopping trolley and get
into trouble!!!!!
The most important thing is to build agreement with your team
on your grammar styling. Take a look at the next chapter to find
the things to agree on.
Once you’ve agreed on them (hopefully with decisions which
reinforce your brand voice’s narrative), then there’s one more
thing to do: quickly laminate your company’s grammar style
guide and get on with the real work.
Just make sure you cover all of the things that are likely to
come up.
GRAMMAR’S RULES AREN’T ‘RULES’.
DECIDE WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN
AND MOVE ON
??
Ex-EVP, Executive Creative Director at Mustache, a Daniel J. Edelman Holdings Company
3 å¹´Excellent title.