Changes to Residential Tenancy in Nova Scotia: A Closer Look
Peter Garonis (Petey G)
Entrepreneur / Owner of PVG Management / REALTOR @ eXp Realty of Canada Inc - Sales I Influence I Problem Solver I Leadership. DM 'coach' for Guidance
Nova Scotia is undergoing significant changes to its residential tenancy laws that are poised to impact both tenants and landlords. A key development is the extension of the rent cap and the modification of rules regarding eviction notices for non-payment.
Extension of the Rent Cap
The Nova Scotia government has proposed to extend the existing five percent cap on rent increases until the end of 2027. This measure, initially introduced to provide stability in the housing market, aims to balance the needs of both tenants and landlords amid rising costs. By capping rent hikes, the government seeks to protect tenants from sudden and significant increases in living costs while acknowledging the financial realities faced by property owners.
?
Pros and Cons of the Rent Cap Extension
Pros:
- Stability for Tenants: Helps tenants plan their finances without fear of unexpected rent increases.
- Controlled Living Costs: Aims to keep housing affordable during a period of general economic inflation.
?
Cons:
- Limited Return on Investment for Landlords: Property owners may find the capped return insufficient, especially if their costs for maintenance, taxes, or utilities increase.
- Potential Decrease in Property Maintenance: Landlords might defer non-essential maintenance to manage costs under the cap.
-?Uniform Rent Increases: To compensate for units priced well below the market value, landlords might feel compelled to uniformly increase rents by the maximum allowable amount each year. This approach, while financially rational from a property management perspective, can strain good tenants who otherwise might not have faced an increase. It reflects a systemic issue where the cap, rather than being a protective measure, inadvertently forces landlords to implement uniform hikes to stay financially viable, impacting tenant-landlord relations and overall tenant satisfaction.
- Finding a reasonably priced rental unit improbable: Similar to uniform rent increases, when a unit becomes vacant, it will ask for rental market rate (higher price than perhaps the unit is worth) to make up for the units that are far below rental cap, and in some cases, landlord losing money. Making it further difficult for tenants, contrary to the intention of a cap.
?
Changes to Eviction Notice Periods
?
A significant change is the reduction in the time allowed for eviction notices due to non-payment of rent. Previously, landlords had to wait 15 days after rent was due to serve an eviction notice. The new legislation reduces this period to just three days, aiming to streamline the process and reduce the financial impact on landlords from delayed rent payments.
Unbeknownst to many, a landlord could not serve a tenant a 'late payment notice' until the 17th day after it was late.? (We can talk about the definition of 'late' another time..)? one of the changes to the act says the landlord now can serve it after only 3 days of being late.
?
Pros and Cons of Shortened Eviction Notice Periods
领英推荐
Pros:
- Quicker Resolution for Landlords: Allows landlords to address non-payment issues more swiftly, reducing financial losses.
- Efficiency in Tenancy Management: Speeds up the process of reletting the property if necessary.
- Increases accountability: Tenant who are aware of the processes and systems potentially can no longer take advantage of them to the same extent.
?
Cons:
- Increased Pressure on Tenants: Shorter notice periods could lead to increased stress and financial pressure on tenants, especially those who may be facing temporary financial difficulties.
- Potential for Increased Homelessness: Quicker evictions could lead to higher rates of homelessness.
?
Implications and Consequences
?
These changes reflect the government's attempt to strike a balance between protecting tenant rights and addressing landlords' concerns over financial viability and property management. While the rent cap extension provides some predictability and protection against steep rent increases, it also raises concerns about investment disincentives and the overall attractiveness of the rental market for property owners.? It also doesn't solve the issue of 'finding' a new place to live for current tenants who will be looking at rental prices much higher than the ones they leave behind.
?
The reduction in the eviction notice period may streamline operations for landlords but could also lead to potential challenges for tenants, particularly those in precarious financial situations. It underscores the need for a balanced approach that considers the rights and responsibilities of both parties in the housing sector.? My?personal opinion on this is that it should be looked at like any other 'bill'. Mortgages, phone, grocery, clothing, etc. When moneys are owed, the next day they are considered late.
?
Overall, these adjustments in tenancy laws highlight the ongoing dialogue and necessary adjustments in Nova Scotia's approach to managing a complex and ever-evolving housing market. Each change carries potential benefits and drawbacks, necessitating continuous assessment and adaptation to ensure that the policies deliver their intended outcomes without unintended negative impacts.
?
How do you feel about the recent amendments to the act?
Curious..
?
Petey G
1 luv
Senior Managing Director, Japan Country Head at Sodali
5 个月Why aren’t rent caps and property tax increases linked? It seems strange that the government caps rents but doesn’t cap the taxes it collects.