The Challenges of Recruiting Technical Safety Engineers in the UK’s Defence and Nuclear Industries.
Ian Cowx
Associate Director - Recruiting Safety Engineers and Human Factors Engineers. [email protected] T: 01342 330547. I provide contingency recruitment or an exclusive one to one retained service, call me to chat.
Recruiting Technical Safety Engineers in the UK’s defence and nuclear sectors is becoming increasingly difficult, as these industries face a unique set of challenges in finding the right talent. Technical Safety Engineers play a critical role in the analytical design and assessment of complex safety systems, ensuring that high-hazard environments, such as nuclear power plants and defence systems, meet rigorous safety standards.
Despite the ongoing demand, recruiting qualified candidates is hampered by several factors, including a skills gap, an aging SQEP workforce, stringent regulatory and nationality requirements, and competition from other industries with less restrictions.
1. Specialised Skill Set and Knowledge Gap
Technical Safety Engineers in the defence and nuclear sectors require a deep understanding of both engineering principles and the specific safety requirements of these high-risk industries. Unlike general health and safety engineers, Technical Safety Engineers focus on system safety analysis, hazard identification, and risk mitigation at the design and development stages of critical infrastructure.
In the UK, there is a significant shortage of professionals with this specialised knowledge. The skills required for technical safety roles go beyond standard engineering qualifications. These engineers must be proficient in advanced modelling tools and methodologies, such as Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA). Additionally, expertise in the safety aspects of weapons systems, nuclear reactors, and high-energy processes is essential, narrowing the pool of qualified candidates even further.
A key issue contributing to the skills shortage is the gap between academic training and industry needs. Universities often do not offer dedicated programmes focused on safety-critical systems design, meaning that engineers may enter the workforce without the necessary depth of knowledge in technical safety. As a result, companies are left competing for the same small number of experienced professionals.
2. Security Clearances and Regulatory Constraints
Another challenge in recruiting Technical Safety Engineers in the defence and nuclear sectors is the requirement for security clearances. Given the sensitive nature of these industries, many roles demand that engineers hold government security clearances, such as the UK’s Security Check (SC) or Developed Vetting (DV) clearances. Obtaining these clearances can be a lengthy and complex process, particularly for candidates from overseas.
This limits the talent pool to UK nationals or long-term residents who can pass stringent background checks. For companies with immediate staffing needs, the time required to process security clearances can create significant delays in recruitment, particularly for highly technical roles where candidates are already scarce.
Additionally, the highly regulated nature of the nuclear and defence sectors requires Technical Safety Engineers to be well-versed in complex regulatory frameworks. In the nuclear industry, engineers must comply with regulations set out by the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), which oversees the safety of nuclear facilities. Defence engineers must meet the Ministry of Defence's (MoD) stringent safety standards, which often evolve based on emerging threats or technology developments. The need for engineers to have a deep understanding of these regulatory environments adds another layer of complexity to the recruitment process.
3. Technological Advancements and Evolving Safety Requirements
The defence and nuclear industries are constantly evolving, with advancements in technology leading to new safety challenges. Emerging technologies like autonomous systems, artificial intelligence, and new materials science are reshaping the safety landscape. Technical Safety Engineers are expected to adapt to these changes, integrating new technologies into safety systems while ensuring they meet rigorous safety standards.
领英推荐
However, many engineers in the current workforce lack the necessary training to address these modern challenges. For example, the growing reliance on digital systems and cybersecurity in both defence and nuclear settings requires safety engineers to understand both the physical and digital aspects of system safety. This blending of disciplines—safety engineering with advanced digital technologies—creates a demand for candidates with multidisciplinary expertise, further narrowing the available talent pool.
4. Competition for Talent
The defence and nuclear sectors are not the only industries vying for Technical Safety Engineers. Sectors such as aerospace, oil and gas, and even renewable energy are competing for the same limited pool of talent. In particular, the aerospace industry shares many of the same safety and regulatory requirements as the defence sector, meaning candidates with relevant skills are often recruited by competing industries offering more attractive compensation packages or faster career progression.
In addition, the geographical distribution of defence and nuclear projects in the UK can pose challenges. Many high-demand sites are located in remote areas, such as nuclear facilities in Cumbria or defence manufacturing sites in the southwest, making it harder to attract candidates who are unwilling to relocate.
?Conclusion
Recruiting Technical Safety Engineers in the UK’s defence and nuclear industries is a challenging task, driven by a shortage of specialised skills, stringent regulatory and security clearance requirements, technological advancements, and competition from other sectors.
To address these challenges, companies have a few clear options, invest in developing their own talent pipeline from Graduates, collaborating with academic institutions to create specialised training programmes, and considering more flexible recruitment strategies, such as selecting Recruitment providers that have a track record of sourcing these skills in these sectors.
Without such measures, the demand for Technical Safety Engineers in these critical sectors is likely to outpace supply and get harder and harder to find good people.
?
Ian Cowx.
Associate Director Gold Group Ltd 01342 330547 [email protected]
System Safety (SysSa) Specialist
5 个月UK defence and System/Technical Safety (SysSa)? ?? Location: I live near Southampton. I do not want to spend 5-days a week in Barrow or Stevenage. My previous contract with Rheinmetall Vienna was remote WFH for 4 years; proof that remote works. ?? Competence: For years, UK defence has been awash with incompetent safety leaders (?) who confuse workplace safety (OH&S) with SysSa; confuse reliability with safety; are clueless about hazards and risks. Many organisations focus on physical safety (PhySa) and ignore functional safety (FuSa). They make a difficult job impossible. ?? Standards: UK defence organisations typically avoid compliance with lifecycle standards, or expect retrospective compliance. Rheinmetall policy is sensibly compliance based [MIL-STD-882E]. ?? Customer: To quote the Ajax report, "Within the acquisition system, safety is not viewed as an equal partner to?cost, schedule and military capability, and the culture in MOD does not currently?ensure safety is considered within strategic decision-making." Very different with DoD (USA) or DSTA (Singapore) as customer. ?? IR35. ??
Sorts Safety Problems in Difficult, Complex and Highly Regulated Applications
5 个月Difficulties in placing Contractors....one reason only, IR35. Difficulties in placing Permies....salaries vs. conditions, other benefits.
Safety Assurance Manager
5 个月Hi Ian. Great post highlighting some very pertinent issues. Having recently made the move from rail safety to defence safety, both industries are certainly struggling with the recruitment of Safety Engineers at all levels.?I can say with some certainty, that the salaries in rail are significantly higher. I’ve seen permanent RAM/Safety engineers with circa 10 years’ experience commanding nigh on 6-figure salaries (I won’t say which project that was on, but its initials are HS2). Anyone who has bought peak time rail ticket recently will be aware of one of the consequences of this. ?Another is trying to complete when recruiting from the already diminutive pool of Safety folk. Personally, I find the safety work in the projects on aircraft/subs/space systems/cyber far more interesting than those in rail (although I’m sure rail enthusiasts will disagree), but for many the lure of the higher salary will only make recruitment/retention in the defence/safety environment a difficult challenge. What we need is a great recruitment agency in the safety domain ?? .
Safety Critical Systems Functional Safety Consultant
5 个月Ian. You've known me for many years, and as such you know there's two holy grails when it comes to seeking the next contract; location (On-site, Hybrid or Remote), and the dreaded IR35. To find a contract which satisfies both my needs, to work from home and to work outside IR35 is rare. AND... when the gov't is taking 70% of my hourly fee to house migrants, it comes to a point where you think enough is enough. I have 35yrs+ of defence system analysis under my belt, so when someone says do I want to commute to Barrow for a net £20/hr or less, the answer is always going to be NO.
Principal Lecturer (Reader) at University of York
5 个月We are trying to fill part of the gap here at York... But as always a small team as unis cannot compete with industrial remuneration... However we had 40 on our introductory system safety course this year so maybe pendulum is swinging... Of course this relies on industry rather than government paying the fees... Sigh...