The Challenges of Digital Transformation and Blockchain Adoption
Richard Ng
Blockchain and Digital Assets VP at UOB | CBDC | Asset Tokenisation | Blockchain | Web3
Why My Parents Finally Ditched Their Iphone 8 for a 16
In 2020, I tried to convince my parents to upgrade from their iPhone 8 to an iPhone 12, but they couldn’t see the need. Four years later, I got them an iPhone 16, and they loved it. Why? It checked all the boxes:
Similarly, for organizations to adopt new technologies, all three factors must align: significant improvement, clear innovation, and a strong push due to outdated systems. Without these, senior management often resists change.
Adoption Lessons from Technology and Blockchain
Similarly, organizations face the same decision-making process when adopting new technologies like blockchain. Challenges such as the lack of transformative appeal, high switching costs, and minimal innovation often deter management from embracing change. Even when technologies like blockchain promise efficiency, fragmented ecosystems and siloed use cases diminish their value.
To unlock the true potential of digital transformation, industries need innovation that inspires, efficiency that justifies the cost, and leadership bold enough to challenge the status quo. Blockchain adoption isn’t just about replacing legacy systems—it’s about delivering clear, undeniable value.
Why Change is Hard: Lack of Innovation and Justifying Switching Costs
A recurring challenge in digital transformation is convincing management to replace legacy systems. While these systems may be slow and clunky, they still work, and the efficiency gains promised by new technologies often fail to justify the high switching costs. For instance, digital receipts offer clear advantages over physical ones—better tracking, reduced paper usage, and convenience. Yet, many businesses continue to rely on physical receipts simply because the cost and effort of transitioning outweigh the perceived benefits.
This is particularly true for blockchain. Many solutions focus on incremental efficiency, but stakeholders question the true innovation behind them. Without transformative "aha moments," these technologies struggle to gain traction. If blockchain's primary value lies in marginal improvements, it often prompts the question: "So what?" In such cases, traditional systems remain the safer, more cost-effective choice.
The Hurdle from POCs to Commercialization
Moving from proof of concepts (POCs) to commercialization is a giant leap. POCs operate in isolated environments, allowing for trial and error. But when integrating these technologies into core banking systems, challenges like AML compliance, regulatory hurdles, and huge integration costs emerge. These complexities often deter stakeholders, especially when efficiency gains seem incremental.
Innovation Stagnation: Lessons from the Crypto space
Blockchain’s reputation often suffers due to a lack of perceived innovation. Since Ethereum introduced smart contracts in 2015, the crypto space has struggled to evolve beyond speculative trading on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). The top 20 crypto projects generating the highest fees today are dominated by DEXs like Uniswap, Sushiswap, and GMX, alongside blockchains such as Ethereum. These platforms account for the lion’s share of activity but offer little in terms of groundbreaking innovation.
Furthermore, the latest trend in the crypto world revolves around meme tokens, further eroding the perception of blockchain’s transformative potential. For financial institutions, which often look to crypto as a reference for blockchain innovation, this stagnation fuels scepticism and diminishes confidence in the technology's ability to deliver truly revolutionary solutions.
The Payment Paradox
While blockchain offers promising efficiencies in use cases like tokenized securities, its payment solutions remain underutilized in regions like Singapore, where existing payment systems are already highly efficient. Introducing blockchain-based payment rails in such advanced economies could even create inefficiencies compared to the status quo.
However, to fully unlock the benefits of blockchain technology in tokenized securities, all components—securities and payments—must operate on the same system. The true efficiencies of blockchain, such as streamlined delivery versus payment (DvP) processes, can only be realized when payments are integrated within the same blockchain ecosystem. This highlights the importance of a unified system to maximize blockchain's transformative potential.
The Fragmentation Problem: 1 Bank 1 Use Case 1 Blockchain
Financial institutions (FIs) are not fully reaping the benefits of blockchain due to a highly fragmented ecosystem. Often, you’ll see a single bank adopting a single use case on a single blockchain. In such scenarios, the transformative value of blockchain diminishes—there’s no real need for a distributed ledger when only one party is involved.
This fragmentation could stem from competition among FIs, reluctance to collaborate, or uncertainty about regulations and standards. Without collective action and interoperability, the true efficiencies of blockchain—such as shared infrastructure, reduced redundancies, and network effects—remain unrealized. To move forward, the industry must adopt a more collaborative approach, where use cases are built for scalability and broader participation across institutions.
The Path Forward
Blockchain adoption requires more than just efficiency gains—it needs bold leadership, collaboration, and genuine innovation to make a compelling case for transformation.
#DigitalTransformation #BlockchainAdoption #Innovation #FutureOfFinance #Leadership #Collaboration #FinTech #Efficiency #Consortiums #POCs #Crypto #Payments #TechnologyTransformation #Web3