The Challenger Paradox - George Costanza Meets Don Draper
Tony J. Hughes
Sales Leadership for a Better Business World - Keynote Speaker, Best-selling Author, Management Consultant and Sales Trainer
Challenger has been out for years and many have read the book but what's the essence of it? You must be willing to challenge or as they say in political circles; speak truth to power. As an example, here is George Costanza being a challenger bull in the china shop.
Don't do this at home folks but there is something instructive in this scene from Seinfeld because real leaders don't want sycophants; they instead want the truth from people who can drive change. George was completely hopeless once employed and incapable of driving anything or delivering any positive result. He ended up sleeping under his desk... they should have reference-checked.
The reality is that Challenging only works if you have the right intent, lead with a worthwhile point-of-view (POV), and have the necessary gravitas and commercial acumen to evidence your claims. Challenger strategies demand deep research and business acumen when seeking to position your 'hypothesis of value'. Sounds simple but it's massively difficult in the real world.
This next example is a classic example of how Challenger can work. The ad agency earned the right to have their 'point of view' / hypothesis of value and they backed it with a provocative insight about how the target market really thinks.
So what is the paradox?
To execute Challenger you must be both confident and humble; provocative and culturally sensitive.
The Challenger Sale by Matthew Dixon and Brent Adamson from the Corporate Executive Board has been with us for years now. It’s a great book and recommended reading for anyone in complex B2B selling. It’s been controversial not only because it claims to be new and groundbreaking, but because it pushes sales people to provocatively challenge customers. The concepts are brilliant but extremely difficult to implement. Here is my interview with John Smibert on Challenger in the real world.
Matt and Brent are to be applauded rather than criticized and anyone who thinks that Challenger is about the ‘hard sell’ is missing the point. Hard selling, push selling, arrogant selling, telling is selling; all fails, especially in Asian markets where I am as I write this.
Causing your prospective customer to lose face as you tell them that they could be doing things better in Asia is kamikaze sales behavior. So is bullishly breaking china with your peacock-chested lecturing; it may be a winning persona at the sales kickoff but it alienates old school CXOs everywhere else. Instead, humility with gravitas goes a long way in all cultures.
The concepts of Challenger Selling are not new. For proof, see page 82 of The Challenger Sale book and you’ll find Neil Rackham’s SAFE:BOLD framework. Challenger is an iteration of Insight Selling which was built on Value Selling which was built on Solution Selling. Lots of great minds evolving strategic B2B selling practice over the years and kudos to Neil Rackham, Jim Holden, Keith Eades, Bob Miller, Steve Heiman and many others. In some ways the strategic selling labels are just semantics – engage and develop the right relationships by leading with insight, then focus on value and build trust. In the background; have a strategy, overcome the competition, map the political power-base, and understand their evaluation, selection and procurement processes.
Don’t misunderstand me, there is huge value in The Challenger concepts but in the hands of the na?ve it can manifest as pushy 1980s ‘telling is selling’ behavior in the eyes of prospective clients. For Challenger to work, you must go deep, bottom of the ocean deep, and that’s not easy or cheap. Challenger goes beyond a sales persona, it’s an organizational capability. Sales, marketing and management must all come together and be 100% committed to transformational change in the way you define customer value and go to market. It’s scary stuff; do your research and don't under-invest. For most sales organizations Challenger will be another transient fad – ‘yeah, we tried that but our sales people weren’t able to execute.’
However, if you would like to adopt a practical and pragmatic approach and take the best concepts from Challenger Selling, here is my advice. Focus on ideation and innovation for your clients. Stop thinking about what you can sell them and instead obsess about their markets and their barriers to faster revenue growth and profitability. There is real magic in going beyond B2B and instead thinking B2B2C. How can you help your clients better serve their markets and customers? This approach allows the value of your content to be the basis of attraction and engagement, rather than betting everything on the caliber of your ‘challenger super-heroes’ within the sales team.
Here’s why ideation is so important. At the end of the day, in professional selling, it’s all about the conversations that salespeople have with the right people inside the customer organization – conversations that create or progress opportunities. We must obsess about what the conversation is going to be about? There is no point securing a meeting and then failing to engage and progress. Relentlessly ask yourself and your team: ‘What is it that can earn a meeting and drive a conversation to create an opportunity based on value for the customer?’ The approach sure as hell must not be about you and what you do…. no-one cares! They care about themselves, their problems and their customers, staff and stakeholders.
We need a big idea, a reason to meet, something worthwhile and intriguing to discuss. This is where the concept of ideation and Design Thinking delivers in a practical way. Design Thinking is a framework for ideation and has been with us for years. It’s an excellent way of harnessing a team’s creative juices to brainstorm and develop ideas and strategies for value and differentiation. Create a cross-functional team of your best minds and ensure the group is heavily weighted with those who know your customers intimately… why not include some of your best customer contacts in the team? Run a process where you identify their thorniest problems, the wicked ones that stymie them. Incorporate the following steps:
- Identify and define the issues, then prioritize them and agree who in the customer organization is impacted most and who really cares about resolution. Who owns the problem and the budget internally and will need to approve the investment?
- Research, research, research. How has this been tackled in the past? Why is it important? What has worked and what has failed? What do analysts and thought leaders think? Create a body of data from which you will be able to draw insights and evidence.
- Brainstorm and ideate. Generate as many ideas as possible. Don't judge, debate or dive down rabbit holes. Have one conversation at a time and record all ideas. Nothing should be rejected or criticized.
- Agree and then develop a short-list of ideas. Refine and test assumptions. Create working models, mock-ups, process-flows… anything that creates tangible representation of your ideas. Seek feedback and refine, adjust and keep going.
- Select the best. Rapidly iterate, refine and evolve. Assess against the problem-solving or solutioning objective. Collaborate but avoid group-think to select the most powerful ideas. Everyone must be committed to the cause of the group, rather than being wedded to their own ideas.
- Execute and implement. Transition to project management mode. Assign task owners, dates and KPIs. Have deliverables with deadlines. How will you communicate the concepts and evidence the rationale and approach?
- Review and learn. Debrief and seek feedback. Document everything. Push it through a new iteration cycle if appropriate. Celebrate success, learn from failure. How can you improve or innovate further?
When all of this is done, then think like a publisher. Create provocative headlines and editorial content. Also create white papers and videos. Your marketing team can execute as a thought leader, exactly as recommended in The Challenger Sale without risk because they are not confronting an individual prospective customer. But remember that people are best motivated by reasons that they themselves discover… help your clients on their journey of discovery rather than preach at them.
Never forget that for a sales person to execute Challenger concepts they must know what the conversation is going to be about, and it must something deeply and provocatively relevant for the customer and their world. This is why it’s so vital that you segment your business based on verticals. Challenger sales people must, by definition, be [customer] industry domain experts.
With all this in place, here is a way of leading and securing meaningful engagements with customers. The most senior people within your potential customers care about evidence-based research that identifies the trends driving change within their industry and markets. This is what you need to make the conversation about! You have something they don’t… you work with their competitors and maybe some of their customers, and you know what ‘best practice’ looks like in their industry. Or perhaps you have seen how technology or innovation is being applied in other industries and how they could adapt it to gain a competitive advantage? Never divulge a customer’s secrets to their competitor; that’s a huge breach of trust. Be the sage oracle – the trusted advisor, not the gimmicky provocateur.
I believe in Challenger with a twist – do all the work suggested by The Corporate Executive Board, Matt and Brent; but then go to market with attraction rather than projection, insight rather than provocation. The content and insight should be provocative, not the sales person. There is an English proverb: You catch more flies with honey than vinegar. Attraction selling, based on insight and value, is the best approach to early engagement in complex B2B enterprises. Bring a perspective that makes you intriguing and never forget that people buy from those they know, like and trust, and who continuously create value. Understand the way that CEOs think and talk their language. Understand the customer’s mode of business and remember that only the customer is qualified to define value.
Why is Challenger so important?
It's important and can make a real contribution to sales transformation initiatives and enable salespeople to elevate the conversation with prospects and customers. Simon Tate is Area Vice President Asia Pacific: Salesforce, and says,
"The biggest benefit of The Challenger Sale model is that it creates pipeline." Simon Tate
Simon is right and very focused on coaching and mentoring for his people. He also knows not to underestimate the complexity and implementing Challenger in the field. Salesforce and other successful companies understand that Challenger is an organizational capability (marketing, management and sales), not just the profile or persona for the best hunter sales people. Again; management, marketing and sales all need to dig deep together to find genuine relevant insights that can be positively yet provocatively taken to customers and prospects at senior levels.
A potential problem with Challenger is that sales people could easily lapse back into a 'telling is selling' approach and the framework tends to under-value the role of relationships in selling. We all know that you’d better have a very good relationship with someone if you plan on telling them that their baby is ugly. Both the Trusted Advisor and Challenger models are aspirational but Challenger must be extremely well engineered and strongly evidenced to be effective, especially where you don't have strong relationships. The term 'Challenger' is best avoided in Asian markets for obvious reasons. It is best used to frame strategy for penetrating new accounts but it must be executed by someone with gravitas and genuine customer industry expertise.
On a positive note, the Challenger model forces the sales person to take well researched insights to the most senior stakeholders within their prospect or customer and then provoke conversation and thought with a hypothesis concerning how the customer's world can be changed by more than just solving a problem or unlocking greater value. It moves beyond cliche and the big questions for sales people are:
- What insights can you take to the prospective customer?
- Which customer executives should be engaged?
- How will you shape the conversation with relevance to their world?
- What is your [tested] hypothesis concerning the creation of business value?
- Do you have compelling relevant evidence specific to their business to support your dramatic claims?
- Do you have the necessary relationships or trust for creating constructive tension?
- Does it all lead to the unique value you offer the market to eliminate your competition?
Key benefits of Challenger are that it forces sales and marketing to [finally] come together for effective strategic demand generation. It also creates a focus on transformational business value as defined by the customer and their markets. There are however key points to consider to manage implementation risks for Challenger in the real world:
- It's not a silver bullet but rather a complex and difficult strategy requiring deep analysis and capability
- It's not about hiring a particular persona of sales person (hunter and domain expert)
- Challenger must be an organizational capability, not a sales strategy
- Success with Challenger demands high investment and organizational change
- Sales and Marketing must come together under a single leader to execute
- You must have unique intrinsic value around which you can build a Challenger strategy
- You rise or fall on the strength, insight and execution capability of sales management
- Poor execution can result in demand generation for your competitor if you educate and fail to close.
- Don't de-emphasize executive relationships (with customers think: 'trusted advisor with provocative insights')
- Avoid using the term 'Challenger' in Asian markets (complete cultural mismatch and potentially offensive)
- Don't even think about trying to make amiable personalities adopt the Challenger persona (unnatural act)
How do you start with your Challenger implementation?
- Honestly and critically assess your competitive differentiation in the eyes of the customer (what matters to them)
- Then identify the elements that deliver real unique business value (by segment and buyer role) combining the intrinsic (product or service) and extrinsic (how you operate) value elements
- Create questions to the customer that lead to your unique business value for them
- Identify insights that you can use to secure appointments and frame conversations
- Create collateral that supports insights and evidences provocative claims
- Find and target the senior 'Mobilizer' within the customer organization
- Obsess about the disciplined execution of your strategy. Sales management is key!
The Challenger Sale provokes strategic thinking, collaboration and a focus on value, as defined by customers. What's been your experience in implementing Challenger? Let me know in the comments section here.
If you valued this article, please hit the ‘like' button and also share via your Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+ and Facebook social media platforms. I encourage you to join the conversation or ask questions so feel free to add a comment on this post. Please follow my LinkedIn post page for all my articles. Visit me at www.tonyhughes.com.au if you're looking for a keynote speaker to wake-up and inspire your sales team. Go to www.RSVPselling.com for my sales methodologies that generate pipeline and manage complex opportunities. Main image from Don Draper Image credit: madmen.wikia.com
Buyer-Centric B2B Sales & Repeatable Growth | Founder @ LiveGuru & The Closing Foundry
5 年Stunning article. Thanks Tony J. Hughes
La mia promessa è permettere alle imprese di guadagnare di più grazie a decisioni migliori. Originale dal 1960. TedX Speaker 19. Maratoneta (10) dal 18. Marito dal 85. Padre (3) dal 86. Nonno (5) dal 17.
5 年Oh wow... so rich and enlightening!
Doing more work for same pay? | Micromanaged? | Skills being commoditzed? | Feeling under-utilized? | It's Time To Find Your Calling
7 年Kodak Carousel was Don's best pitch.
Founder and owner of Private Drivers Online - personal transport the way you’ve always wanted it. Mental health advocate at BE UNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION.
7 年Her response, "What I'm showing you is relevant to all sales teams." OMG! Here was a sales rep trying to convince me to support Challenger Selling, yet she was completely ignoring the principles of the methodology. My point is that Challenger lends itself to the inexperienced sales person, or the ones who are not good at disciplined execution, to fall back all too easily into telling-selling mode. Complexity of any methodology often becomes its weakness.
Founder and owner of Private Drivers Online - personal transport the way you’ve always wanted it. Mental health advocate at BE UNSTOPPABLE FOUNDATION.
7 年As you rightly point out, Tony, Challenger is not new, nor is it revolutionary. It is a sound approach to disrupting the status quo and creating qualified pipeline. You also pointed out that it needs to be properly executed to be successful. In the hands of some sales people, Challenger can be disastrous. Let me give you an example. Several years ago, I was approached to have Challenger Selling adopted by a large sales force. The sales person, after some pleasantries, opened her iPad and started delivering a PPT presentation on Challenger Selling training. It was an interesting presentation with cited evidence from multiple studies about performance improvement. After about 20 minutes of monologue, I felt compelled to interrupt, so I said, "I've read the book and I can't help wondering when you are going to start implementing the relevant Challenger principles in this conversation." Her response, "I haven't finished this PowerPoint yet." I let her proceed for about another two to three minutes in the hope that my interjection would get processed. So I again interrupted, "How do you know that these facts and figures you're showing me are actually relevant to this organisation?" (Continued in next comment.)