CFPB's Best Intentioned Mistake

CFPB's Best Intentioned Mistake

In an effort to try to help consumers understand mortgage options when buying a home, the CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) has created the most misleading and inaccurate tool that will do anything but help prospective home buyers.

The tool, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/owning-a-home, is located on a web page that actually gives a lot of really good advice to new home buyers. It encourages them to shop for a loan with more than one lender to make certain they are getting the best options and encourages them to use trusted service providers for the closing process, and more.

Unfortunately what they have also done is post a mortgage shopping tool that violates the mortgage disclosure requirements that they have put in place for lenders to follow in order to protect and fully disclose the full costs of a mortgage to a consumer. That's right, the very agency tasked with setting forth the policies that lenders in the US must comply with when disclosing a loan to a prospective borrower has done just the opposite on this new website "tool".

Annual percentage rates, mortgage insurance premiums for FHA, or private mortgage insurance for a Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae loan, application fees, lock terms, appraisal costs, title insurance estimates, and more are completely missing from this tool. What is of the most concern is that the CFPB has been working hard to get consumers to look beyond just the rate in order to truly understand the total costs of a mortgage and yet has just put a "tool" on their website that only discloses base rate and nothing more.

The best intentions are clear - but this was done with no consideration for the precise compliance obligations (respa/tila ) and disclosure objectives (UDAP) that this same federal agency has been trying to implement.

The CFPB should take this misleading shopping tool down and focus on providing a resource that encourages the borrower to shop more than one lender and make certain they understand the base rate and all other costs and terms. Simply put -the tool needs to be removed but the site itself should be supported for the good advice it otherwise provides.

Concerned individuals, especially those with knowledge about how misleading this really is, should email the bureau directly and state their concerns at: [email protected] with subject line rate tracker.

ansa aqua

Senior health officer at NNPC

9 年

Thanks.

回复
Mary Jane Lucas

Blogger/ Lyft driver / secretary

9 年

Impressive !

回复
Thomas Bohlmann

Manager & Broker in Charge at Bohlmann & Bohlmann LLC. REO Asset Disposition, Real Estate.

9 年

What is that saying? When a person comes to you and says, " I am from the gov. I am here to help." Run

回复

I agree that we should try to get the CFPB to cease and desist this misleading "rate tracker". I'd also like to know exactly where they are obtaining the rates. When I checked last Friday, the base rate quoted for my state was .375% higher than the rate we were quoting without points. Certainly not leading the consumer to the best deal!

回复
Bruce W. Schultz

SVP, Community Development/CRA Officer NMLS#451149

9 年

We all know where the road that is paved with good intentions leads.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

David H. Stevens, CMB的更多文章

  • Leading in Crisis - Or Not

    Leading in Crisis - Or Not

    Our industry is in a crisis. And for our friends in Washington who lay claims to being leaders, the crisis is not the…

    58 条评论
  • It’s Time To Challenge The Fed

    It’s Time To Challenge The Fed

    From todays Wall Street Journal, “Though some still predict mortgages will be cheaper by year’s end, much depends on…

    45 条评论
  • The Detrimental Effects of Political Partisanship on the Housing Industry And Mortgage Finance

    The Detrimental Effects of Political Partisanship on the Housing Industry And Mortgage Finance

    As everyone is critically aware, in recent years political partisanship has become increasingly dominant, permeating…

    31 条评论
  • Final Comments On The LLPA Changes

    Final Comments On The LLPA Changes

    I hate it when housing issues get politicized. That doesn’t mean I won’t state my opinions, but when issues like the…

    57 条评论
  • Where Is Housing Policy Leadership?

    Where Is Housing Policy Leadership?

    American housing and lending policy leaders have been talking about “gaps” in housing for far too long. There are gaps…

    53 条评论
  • Lessons From SVB and the Non Bank Conundrum.

    Lessons From SVB and the Non Bank Conundrum.

    So let me say this up front, the regulators seem to have blown this one. While the focus in the regulatory community…

    30 条评论
  • The SVB Collapse: Read Between The Lines

    The SVB Collapse: Read Between The Lines

    The Silicon Valley Bank failure is bringing out all sorts of descriptive statements. I spoke to a well known national…

    57 条评论
  • Life and Career

    Life and Career

    I started my career as a top producing loan originator in Denver in 1983. I ultimately ended up assisting the President…

    102 条评论
  • The FHFA’s Affordable Lending Conundrum - It Needs Changing

    The FHFA’s Affordable Lending Conundrum - It Needs Changing

    I recently did an interview for ARCH MI applauding FHFA Director Sandra Thompsons efforts to force the GSE’s to do more…

    54 条评论
  • Are Rate Hikes Near The End?

    Are Rate Hikes Near The End?

    One of the things I continuously emphasize to my clients is that “this too shall pass”. Much of the homebuyer sentiment…

    34 条评论

社区洞察