Certificate of Merit Decision

Certificate of Merit Decision

In Texas in the case of Kudela & Weinheimer, LP v De Dios Arriaga, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 3186 (Tex. App. May 11,2023 a valet was injured when his was struck by a car in the driveway of an apartment building while he was trying to retrieve keys that had been dropped from a storm drain.? He sued others initially with an engineer’s certificate of merit.? There was later an amendment to the lawsuit that added the architect and the landscape architect without an updated certificate of merit as required under § 150.002. Certificate of Merit statute.? Both filed Motions to Dismiss asserting the Arriagas failedto timely file a proper certificate of merit.? The trial court denied the Motion.? The appellate court reversed in relation to the landscape architect, but not the architect as the amended complaint included an affidavit from an architect despite the fact it was late.? They found there was a late filing exception, and that the architect who did not practice architecture and failed to specify the breach alleged.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Lauren Rhodes Martin的更多文章

  • Contract Termination

    Contract Termination

    This was a case related to the termination of a contract between a homeowner and a design firm. The project was on an…

  • Certificate of Merit

    Certificate of Merit

    This project involved the widening of pavement, and AECOM Technical Services Inc., who was the Engineer sued their…

  • Site Safety Case

    Site Safety Case

    In the wrongful death case captioned The Estate of Juan Jose Triana Fuenmayor v Goya Foods et al, the engineer was…

  • Economic Loss Doctrine Decision

    Economic Loss Doctrine Decision

    Economic Loss Rule Case In the case captioned District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority ("DC Water") brought suit…

    3 条评论
  • Contractual Provisions are Important

    Contractual Provisions are Important

    In the case of Markel American Insurance Company v. MR.

  • Architect Not Responsible for Site Safety

    Architect Not Responsible for Site Safety

    In the case of Bonilla v. Verges Rome Architects, 2023-00928 (La.

  • FHA Claims

    FHA Claims

    In the case of Clover Communities Beavercreek, LLC v Mussachio Architects PC, 2023 U.S.

  • Third-Party Beneficiaries

    Third-Party Beneficiaries

    In the case of Walton Global Investments Ltd. v Bowman Consulting Group Ltd 2023 U.

  • Duty

    Duty

    In the case of 21 Park Place NY L.P.

    1 条评论
  • Standard of Care Decision

    Standard of Care Decision

    In the case of Pennington v Memorial Hospital of South Bend inc. 206 N.

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了