CEOs Will No Longer Accept Marketing That Doesn't Deliver ROI

CEOs Will No Longer Accept Marketing That Doesn't Deliver ROI

Brand advertising as we know it will completely disappear.

And what’s killing it? Marketers, agencies, and publishers who can’t prove that their marketing investments work.

This is all according to Gabe Leydon, CEO of Machine Zone, one of the world’s largest gaming companies who shared his shocking views in one of the most interesting interviews on Marketing in the past year. The YouTube video is titled "Watch MachineZone's CEO freak out a room full of Media execs”.

CMOs always tell me that their biggest challenge is proving the ROI of their Marketing investments. So I was really intrigued by this interview from a CEO telling marketers that it was time to show real business results.

If you watch the whole thing, you can tell from the questions and the audience reaction, that this was not what advertisers, agencies, and media companies wanted to hear. But don’t worry, you don’t have to watch it (although you should.) I’m gonna break down the key points here.

Never heard of Machine Zone or their CEO, Gabe Leydon? He’s the one responsible for all those Mobile Strike ads featuring Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Game of War ads with Kate Upton. And he is one of the largest media buyers in the world.

You might be wondering, if he doesn’t believe in ads, then why is his company spending millions of dollars every year on TV commercials?

WHY ADVERTISE AT ALL?

Just like many other brands, Machine Zone wants to grow its business internationally. Leydon says their goal is to build a game that the whole world can play at the same time, and to do so it would need to market to the entire world so everyone is aware of their game and can play at the same time.

This sounds like the traditional “reach and frequency” argument you’ve heard from many ad execs for years.

But he argues that he employs the world’s best engineers to create an amazing product experience. To him, the media is just an extension of his focus on creating desirable brand experiences.

And that is why he doesn’t recommend ads to any brands unless they have an amazing product and who have already maximized their spending and measured the results first on digital.

To Leydon, advertising is overpriced and no one is really watching it anyway. The problem for many buyers though, is that they don’t know this because they are not tracking it.

According to Leydon, “CEOs and boards will no longer accept marketing that isn’t driving real business results.”

His advice: if you’re going to spend all that money on ads, you need to learn to measure the effectiveness of the ad spend to actual business results.

YOU CAN’T RELY ON ONE ADVERTISING MEDIUM

Brands must diversify their channel strategy because we aren’t just watching television or using Facebook or Twitter. We all use multiple sites, channels and apps every day.

When you do so, Leydon says you can price your media much more effectively because you can make everyone compete with each other. Machine Zone reportedly uses over 300 channels for their advertising campaigns.

"MEDIA COMPANIES & AGENCIES DON'T HAVE A REAL BUSINESS"

The problem Leydon sees is that currently there is no ad tech or software platform to make everyone truly compete in an open market. And he blames networks and agencies for this because they all create their own lock-ins that makes it very difficult for buyers to measure and quantify the value of their advertising spend.

Leydon commented that agencies exist “to steal my money.” And publishers intentionally mask their data to keep media buyers in the dark. Ouch!

Networks and media companies talk about how many eyeballs they have, but that is as much (or little) data as you’ll get from them. To Leydon, that just doesn’t work anymore.

There is a lot of fraud out there, and buyers will increasingly want to know if these eyeballs are real or not and how they are performing. They will want to know the effects of their ad buying, and if they can buy more to scale.

Leydon believes that today’s media companies and networks lack this transparency and performance data.

“Publishers are kind of dipping their toes in the water of digital, and they’re only doing it halfway and they’re getting really scared by it,” Leydon says. They don’t know what is happening and they just want to go back to television because they make more money from it than digital.

And agencies are telling buyers that they will help them and get them the best buys. But what is problematic about agencies, in Leydon’s opinion, is that they are worth (in multiples) exactly what their sales are.

So agencies are not “incentivized to do the right thing,” they are incentivized to convince buyers to buy and spend as much money as they possibly can, regardless of whether their ads are actually working or not.

That is why Machine Zone doesn’t go through agencies to buy ads. Publishers are not incentivized to quantify their audience and price their media, and agencies are working together in that. This allows them to all set prices based on this lack of transparency, without any real performance data to justify their pricing.

So why is there a push to avoid quantifying their media among networks and agencies?

Leydon argues that media companies and agencies don’t actually have a real business.

The users who consume their media don’t want to pay them anything and want everything for free, and they’re actively trying to avoid paying.

So publishers need to depend on someone else who has a real business and has something people actually want and are willing to pay for, to give them money so they can have a business.

They rely on buyers, the ones with the actual business and money, to survive.

The reason why advertising is broken and why media companies are consolidating or even collapsing, is that, in Leydon’s words, they are in denial about “what their business really is, what their true value of their business is, and they’re doing everything possible to avoid real value measurement of what they do.”

"BRAND ADVERTISING WILL COMPLETELY DISAPPEAR"

Once buyers have insights into how their advertising dollars are spent and the positive ROI of these marketing channels, television-style advertising, the current version of brand advertising will completely disappear.

The new version will be highly measured. Digital will break it all down because it’s all trackable and price and value will become discoverable.

When the market becomes more quantifiable, it will be hard for any CEO or executive boards to justify marketing investment they can’t measure.

Brand advertising will suffer as a result.

PERFORMANCE-BASED MARKETING IS THE FUTURE

That is why Leydon thinks media companies and agencies need to embrace and focus on performance marketing.

Google is the world’s second largest company for a reason. It’s a performance marketing company.

Facebook is worth $300 billion because they’re also a performance marketing company.

People buy and give them money because it’s trackable (arguably), measurable and quantifiable media.

Yet, media companies and agencies are actively avoiding performance marketing. This is why their value is shrinking and why they’re seeing so much failure. It’s because it’s simply just not working.

MY TAKE

As a former media buyer with a multi-million media budget, I was committed to proving that marketing can drive real business results!

We used our best (and tested) thought leadership content run natively on publisher sites, to negotiate media buys based on CPL (Cost Per Lead) only performance criteria.

Publishers hated it. But it was non-negotiable for us.

Want to make media buyers scatter? Ask them for their terms on CPL-only buys. It takes a lot of media budget to get them just to sit at the table.

But this focus creates a win-win for everyone.

Customers are given access to great content.

Agencies and publishers get paid based on the performance of their media buys.

And brands can quantify the value of their dollars, even after figuring in the cost to nurture and convert those leads down the funnel to actual sales.

I thought this video was so compelling that I actually watched the full-length twice!

This is not a CMO or ad buyer. These are shockingly accurate comments from a CEO. Who mentioned multiple times that all the sophisticated buyers in the room would agree with him.

Do you agree with Leydon’s critiques? I’d love to hear your thoughts, so please share in the comments section below!

Are you interested in engaging and converting new customers for your business? Contact me here and let’s talk about how we can help. Or follow me on LinkedInTwitterFacebook and if you like what you see, Subscribe here for regular updates.

Photo Source

Watch Leydon’s full interview at Code/Media below.


Eric M. Clark

Dynamic Global Brands Portfolio Manager. I analyze and select the brands that exhibit high brand relevancy and technical prowess for the Dynamic equity strategy using a proprietary brand relevancy scoring system.

5 年

This article is so refreshing! I’ve struggled for years, particularly analyzing ad-based revenue models. The reality is Netflix and a few others have tapped into our desire to AVOID the obnoxious marketing that’s directed at us every minute of every day. So much of the ad $$ spent is literally a waste of $$. I’d rather see these brands build a brand message and support important causes in the name of being good corporate citizens. That’s a message that will be received well by consumers and their end goals would be met and the $$ woukdnt be wasted. Traditional media and ad spend is on borrowed time. Even targeted ads from FB and GOOGL are getting obnoxious. Every 3 posts inn instagram is an ad, very few of them are relevant and it will drive people away eventually. Everyone talks about how the “delete FB” campaign failed but I’m confident the narrative should have been “ignore FB”. How many accounts are active but not used? Brands may as well burn the dollars, most of it is falling in deaf ears and FB in particular is wildly overvalued imo

GOOD, I WAS NEVER INTERESTED.

回复
Vugar Zeynalov

Baku, Azerbaijan

7 年

one global approach .

回复
David Henze

Strategic leadership for accelerated growth and profitability.

7 年

Nice ad.

回复
Mike Amerson

Art Director at FL Galaxy

7 年

I'm often solicited by marketers in the apps world and I've devised a way to minimize my risk and screen out any false promises that they can't deliver on. When they approach me with a traditional offer for ad spend and stating how great they are or how effective it will be but have no way to track its effectiveness - I offer with a co- op deal based on my current revenues. If they go above the baseline average revenues that Im currently receiving, then we split the profits for a specific duration of timen, (usually the length of the promotion). This method works well for both parties and weeds out anyone who is just talk.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了