Ceci n'est pas une cybersecurity company

Ceci n'est pas une cybersecurity company

Defending democracy is a pointless goal.

No battle was ever won by defense alone, so defending democracy is a short-sighted, bare minimum effort. Making democracy stronger is a better objective.

Although no two democracies are the same, they share a common thread: Continuity is the throughline in all democracies.

Societal continuity, achieved via trust, security, and privacy, and delivered by, with and through commercial and civic institutions. As sure as death, taxes and Shark Week, we know there will be light when we flip the switch, ample consistently-priced food on supermarket shelves and that the package you ordered will arrive at its destination unopened. That’s institutional continuity.

So why do we tolerate the dwindling institutional continuity in cyberspace?

Shouldn’t the reasonable expectation of security, safety and privacy that covers my person, data, mail, financial transactions, reputation, and purchases extend to cyberspace as well?

I think so. But that is not the direction in which we’re headed.

A leader’s job is to define reality first, lead second. The reality today is that current cyber strategies, tactics and technologies are unviable in the face of this cyber threat.

Cybersecurity --the way we do it now-- is not working. The software doesn’t work, the policy doesn’t work, there is no viable strategy. You can tell because cyber events are increasing in scope, scale, speed, and detrimental impact. No congressionally mandated inquiry or think tank study is required to see the obvious.

The reality is: A democracy cannot thrive under protracted cyber aggression.

I am a builder, not a complainer. The best way to guarantee the future is to build it. So my team and I built the missing infrastructure required to change the trajectory of this cyberconflict, toward an endstate where risk in the cyber and the physical domains are at parity, and as a result, democracies everywhere can gain strength and thrive.

I want a future where American and allied democracy is incontestably strong and getting stronger over time. I also don’t want to live in a world where foreign enemies of the United States have influence over my online affairs (a consequential portion of my daily life, and an idea which I’ll save that for another post).

In my office, we believe democratic values must be proactively protected and enabled to thrive. So we fortify democracies by enabling consistency, trust, security and privacy in critical institutions.

In this way, Nemesis isn’t a cybersecurity company. We work in the cyber domain, but our objective isn’t to protect individual operational environments. Our mission is to eradicate the cyber threat to democracy by denying adversary mission success at scale.

That’s the future we’re building at Nemesis Global.

And this is what #NemesisDelivers.

Dr. Maurizio Dalla Torre

CEO and Owner | Data Masters in AI: Machine Learning/ Business Disruptor

7 个月

As always, your insights are as sharp as razors. Well done. However, enlarging our view, I believe there is a legislative gap regarding how we could establish a threshold beyond which a cyberattack can be considered a deliberate act of war, justifying a kinetic response by a nation. I am aware that there is an ongoing, in-depth debate in the United States on this matter. However, as of today, it seems that we still view a cyberattack as an action within a spectrum not necessary leading up to kinetic warfare. I think we need to change this paradigm: a massive cyberattack should be considered a de facto act of war that warrants a kinetic response which could also be too late! There is great value in clearly defining this threshold.....

回复
Roger Ach

Founder at Chicago West Pullman llc, SocialPay?, BioTone?? & Affiliates

7 个月

Well said, as always Gentry ! Reposted Roger Ach

回复
Val Bercovici

Building AI Factories, Open Source & Cloud Native

7 个月

Great mission statement ??

Jeffrey Hanson

Data Center, Cybersecurity, AI Consultant @ Unify Consulting | HITRUST, SAFe?

7 个月

“The reality is: A democracy cannot thrive under protracted cyber aggression.” My thesis as well.

Jeffrey Hanson

Data Center, Cybersecurity, AI Consultant @ Unify Consulting | HITRUST, SAFe?

7 个月

??????

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Gentry Lane的更多文章

  • CONDITION vs. CONFLICT

    CONDITION vs. CONFLICT

    Is relentless cyber aggression on American companies a condition that needs to be managed or an adversary invasion that…

    3 条评论
  • HARMING THE HEGEMON

    HARMING THE HEGEMON

    Will the genius who created this meme please come forward for due attribution. Thanks How Loopholes & Lack of Strategy…

    8 条评论
  • Choosing Battles in a Multi-Front War.

    Choosing Battles in a Multi-Front War.

    Fed up with the volatility and shifting borders in central Europe, rise of autocracy and encroaching antisemitism in…

    9 条评论
  • US Manufacturing: Once a Strength, Now a Liability

    US Manufacturing: Once a Strength, Now a Liability

    Not since WWII has private industry carried such outsized influence on national security strategy and policy. Now more…

  • Buyer Beware

    Buyer Beware

    And be smarter, too. My big takeaway from the CrowdStrike Catastrophe: People buy cybersecurity software without…

    11 条评论
  • "I’d Lay My Life Down For My Country, But Not For My Program"

    "I’d Lay My Life Down For My Country, But Not For My Program"

    Here’s what I don’t understand: Warfighters are brave enough to sacrifice their life for this country, but not brave…

    15 条评论
  • CYBERSECURITY’S COME TO JESUS MOMENT

    CYBERSECURITY’S COME TO JESUS MOMENT

    AND THE INEVITABLE CAPITULATION OF CYBERSPACE Thank God the CrowdStrike security event didn’t happen during a national…

    29 条评论
  • 1938 or 1939?

    1938 or 1939?

    I just returned from 6 weeks in 7 European countries meeting with 8 national cyber directors, warfighters, NATO…

    34 条评论
  • Countercyberspace Operations

    Countercyberspace Operations

    Harrowing Truth About the Current Condition A well-known fact: Civilian critical infrastructure companies comprise the…

    16 条评论
  • The World is a Tinderbox and Putin is Playing with Matches

    The World is a Tinderbox and Putin is Playing with Matches

    The timing of two recent events scares the hell out of me. During an interview, Putin said that Russia would “invade…

    7 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了