Ceasefire Shout - A Distraction to Navigate the Double Standards in the Palestinian Tragedy

The recent call for a "Ceasefire" in the occupied Palestinian territories, particularly in the face of the actions led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, unveils a disturbing game being played with the minds of global citizens.

Men, Women, and Children are being slaughtered by Missiles, Bombs, Chemicals, and R9X US Hellfires.

It is indeed perplexing to witness the international community urging a pause in hostilities when the perpetrator has, in essence, set up his own pseudo-court, escaping arrest and accountability. This raises critical questions about the effectiveness and fairness of the international response, particularly from the United States, which seems to advocate for a mere four-hour hiatus in attacks. The psychological manipulation at play in this situation is not only absurd but also dangerous, as it exposes glaring double standards that are becoming increasingly evident to people worldwide.

I. The Absurdity of Ceasefire Appeals

The call for a ceasefire from the very individual orchestrating the aggressive actions raises fundamental questions about the sincerity of the international community's approach. We must stop and think "Why we are asking criminals for a ceasefire"?. Will a criminal agree to a ceasefire? There is a duty that lies on "United Nations" to arrest such leaders like Netanyahu and Biden to make them accountable. Whole the world is crying but the answer is let's shout for this Funny Chanting of #Ceasefire.

Who will stop the attack on Hospitals?

• According to Geneva Convention, even if you have an idea that there is a terrorist in a hospital, you cannot harm the hospital/medical facilities.
• Even if you are sure that there is a terrorist in a food or water truck, you cannot harm the aid.
• Even if there is a terrorist in a mosque, church, or mandir, you cannot harm the religious sites.
• You cannot use harmful chemicals to kill human beings - USA is providing R9X US Hellfires to target civilians and target through laser to kill innocent people in pieces with this hellfire.
• You are not allowed to go for the forced displacement of the residents/civilians

It is proved that what Netanyahu and Biden are doing can never be justified and it needs legal actions against them. The absurdity lies in seeking a cessation of hostilities from a party that has demonstrated a blatant disregard for international law. It challenges the essence of justice when the call for a ceasefire is not accompanied by concrete steps toward holding accountable those responsible for grave breaches of human rights and humanitarian law.

II. Double Standards and Selective Intervention

The United States, a key player in global affairs, has advocated for a meager four-hour pause in attacks, highlighting a troubling double standard. The psychological game being played becomes all the more apparent when such a brief respite is suggested, as it underscores a lack of genuine commitment to ending the crisis and addressing the root causes of the conflict. This selective intervention not only undermines the principles of justice and equality but also fuels skepticism about the true intentions behind such calls for a temporary halt.

III. International Laws and Accountability

Numerous international laws and conventions exist to hold individuals accountable for violations committed during armed conflicts. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's actions, as described, potentially fall under the purview of the Geneva Conventions, particularly in terms of targeting civilians and engaging in collective punishment. The Additional Protocol I of 1977 reinforces the prohibition against such practices, emphasizing the need for accountability.

IV. The Role of the United States

The role of the United States in this scenario raises questions about its commitment to upholding international law and justice. The limited call for a brief pause in hostilities, rather than advocating for a comprehensive and just resolution, contributes to the perception of a biased stance. The international community must hold all parties accountable for their actions, irrespective of political alliances.

Conclusion: A Call for Genuine Accountability

In conclusion, the ongoing tragedy in occupied Palestine exposes not only the brutality of the actions but also the inadequacy of the international response. The absurdity of seeking a ceasefire without pursuing justice undermines the very principles of accountability and fairness. It is imperative for the global community to move beyond symbolic gestures and demand genuine accountability for those responsible, applying international laws consistently and without bias. Anything less perpetuates a dangerous narrative of double standards and undermines the pursuit of a just and lasting resolution to the conflict.