The CDO-CIO Turf War is a Waste of Time And Here’s What Really Matters
Samir Sharma
? CEO at datazuum | Data & AI Strategy | Target Operating Models Specialist | Value Creation | ?? Speaker | ?? Host of The Data Strategy Show
Over the last few weeks there have been a lot of posts about who should own AI etc. and it seems that the data industry is tearing itself apart over this, as if job titles and semantics are the solution that could make it magically deliver value.
Chief Data Officers (CDOs) want control, insisting of course that data is the key to AI success, which is true, and while this is happening, Chief Information Officers (CIOs) are stepping in, fed up with seeing data and AI projects go nowhere.
But here’s the harsh truth, neither the title nor the turf matters. All that matters to business leasers is delivering results and driving the business forward positively.
Right now, many CDOs are under delivering, which is why CIOs are taking over. But without a radical change in focus, it won’t make a difference who’s in charge.
The Data Industry Needs a Reality Check
Instead of asking whether AI should belong to the CDO or CIO, we should be asking why the data industry is still bogged down in semantics and navel gazing. AI and data strategies are supposed to drive real business impact. But what are we doing instead? Debating whether it’s “data” or “information,” as if anyone in the C-Suite cares. CEOs and COOs are sick of it, and they’re not wrong.
CDOs, in particular, need to get back to the basics: show that data and AI can make a tangible difference, or step aside. The answer isn’t about ownership. It’s about who can actually make data deliver value. And let’s be honest, there are very few who have done this.
Here’s the Fix: 4 Steps to Make Data Matter Again
领英推荐
The Bottom Line: Less Talk, More Results
The data industry is at a crossroads, and the path we choose will define not just roles and responsibilities but the very purpose of data and AI within business. We can continue down the well-worn road of debates and turf wars, where roles are protected, definitions are guarded, and outcomes are delayed. Or we can finally step up and deliver the results businesses are crying out for.
For too long, we’ve treated data as an isolated asset, precious in its own right. But data has no value in a vacuum. It’s worth lies entirely in its ability to serve a purpose, to bring clarity, efficiency, and, ultimately, profit to the organisation. To realise this potential, data professionals must shift from defending titles to defending business relevance. And this means making a clear, measurable impact.
The answer isn’t to argue over whether the CDO or CIO should “own” AI or data; the answer is for both roles to transcend their current limitations. Ownership in data and AI isn’t about who controls it, it’s about who can amplify its utility and prove its worth to those who hold the organisation’s purse strings. Leadership in data must be earned through business outcomes, not asserted through titles.
This requires a philosophical shift for many CDOs who have come to see data as an end in itself, forgetting its true purpose. The role of data and AI is to create a better, smarter, more resilient business. It is to be embedded within strategy, woven into the fabric of decision making, and attuned to the changing dynamics of the market. We must let go of the need to own for ownership’s sake and embrace the need to serve for purpose’s sake.
It’s time to ask ourselves tough questions: Are we genuinely contributing to the business? Are we focused on outcomes that matter, or are we caught up in internal debates that executives dismiss as irrelevant? This is not just about proving the value of the CDO role, but about proving the value of data and AI itself. When these fields are aligned with true business priorities, they can drive innovation, competitive advantage, and resilience in the face of disruption. But to achieve this, the data industry must stop looking inward and start looking forward.
Deliver Value or Get Out of the Way
To every CDO, CIO, and data leader: the time for internal wrangling is over. Step up and start delivering results that speak the language of business. Forget who owns what and focus on how data and AI can be the powerhouse of growth and innovation.
Align your data efforts with real, business critical use cases, track progress with metrics that matter to the boardroom, and collaborate across functions to ensure AI isn’t just another tech fad but a tool for meaningful change. If we can’t do that, then the data and AI industry will remain a support function rather than the strategic force it should be.
The stakes couldn’t be higher. Let’s make data and AI indispensable to business success. The time is now, deliver value, or get out of the way.
I Designed Logo That Helped Increase Brand Recognition 30% ?? Logo & Brand Designer ???? || ?? Head of Design at Orchid IT ?? Mail: [email protected] || Whatsapp: 08801740945074
3 周Couldn't agree more! ?? It's time we move beyond the noise and focus on making data truly impactful for business growth—excited to see where this conversation leads!
Global Head of Data & Analytics ? Ernst & Young, NBCUniversal ? Keynote Speaker ? Ultra-Runner ? Sharing frank thoughts about leadership, data & business.
3 周Spot on Samir. The more data leaders focus on business value, listen more & talk less, the better the outcome. The echo chamber is getting worse too!
Emerging Technology & Information Governance | Cyber Security | Risk Management
3 周Thank you thank you, I thought I was loosing my mind thinking this way. If it does not deliver business needs then it's just a showoff look at me contest.
KM Practitioner, Strategist, and Leader
3 周The Chief Knowledge Officers are looking on in amusement. "When you are done pulling hair, would you get back to work, please?" ??????
Consulting Data Ethicist, Project Management, AI Governance, Delivery/ データのマスター / QEF
3 周One thing that should be avoided is the introduction of a CAIO role as if it will fix things just by existing. AI is just another tech project and 99% of the time does NOT deserve its own CxO. The CDO and the CIO should already have the relevant tech vs business parts clear in their remit, but if they do not know what they are doing when AI is 3rd party or internal development then separating that control to a new CxO, and having to establish brand new appropriate comms routes and processes, is asking for confused failure.