All the Climate's Feedback Loops : CCR_2020 = "Climate Change Revival"

In 2019 Greta Thunberg was putting an emotional alarm bell on the climate with good reason but : Before we start, tell us all please what you see to be missing in the climate flow diagram above ...

With your feedback and remarks we will separate facts from fiction so by the end of 2020 we may together understand earth climate a little better if we can put a number (quantity per year) on each arrow in the above flow diagram in the coming 12 month of leap year 2020 ...

There are more non-biased scientists in the world-population than in "energy economy" and in all the "left wing & right wing" over-subsidized political organizations like IPCC & NASA et cetera ... Based on the red hot hockey stick temperature predictions, they put fear on the people with extreme sea level rise and extreme weather events as a result of climate change but predictions since decades were not (yet) confirmed in reality ... Or is it press and medea looking for sensation and abusing/misinterpreting all the scientific IPCC & NASA climatological info ?

Plants love CO2 to double or go to 0,1%=1000ppm and we are now at 415ppm.

But according to "climatology" humans disturb the climate with CO2 from fossil energy :

Δ F = α ln ? ( C / C 0 ) where C 0 is the concentration of CO2 at the beginning (time-zero) of the period being studied (if the same concentration unit is used for both C and C 0 , then it doesn't matter which concentration unit is used); C is the CO2 concentration at end of the period being studied; ln is the natural logarithm (= log base e (loge)); and Δ F is the augmentation of the temperature, in other words the change in the rate of heating Earth's surface (radiative forcing), which is measured in Watts per square meter.[27] Derivations from atmospheric radiative transfer models have found that α (alpha) for CO2 is 5.35 (± 10%) W/m2 for Earth's atmosphere.[28]

But some some people say that fossil CO2 is only 11% of the 0,0415%-0,03%=0,0115% extra CO2 since 1950 in the air ...

11% of 0,0115%=0,001265%= 12,65ppm of the 415ppm total CO2 concentration in the air so :

12,65/415=3,04% fossil CO2 versus 96,96% natural CO2 ...

But what would be true ?

It is true that fossil energy keeps on growing and increasing in human economy and it is true that "renewables" are more expensive than fossil.

• People and economy pay the price for subsidized "renewables".
• CO2-tax isn't income tax but tax=tax and pay=pay.
• In Sweden, Arrhenius said in 1895AD that doubling the CO2 would increase 4°Celsius on global temperature : 3%x4°C= 0,122°C fossil CO2 global warming ...
• Doubling electricity price in Denmark and Germany will eliminate 0,122°Celsius on global temperature ?
• Ocean and atmosphere exchange CO2 depending on ocean water temperature to be between +5°C and +25°C or not between +5°C and +25°C.
• We have too much ocean between +5°C and +25°C sending 89% of the modern CO2 into the atmosphere ?

Or is the 11% a serious mistake ? C13-analysis should give us the answer but there is still debate about that : More CO2 Peculiarities – The C13/C12 Isotope Ratio

What is the most important GHG="Green House Gas" in absorption and in atmospheric concentration ?

• H2O="Water Vapor" or CO2="Carbon Dioxide" ?

Photons returning from mother earth surface meet & mate more H2O-molecules on the way up in the sky than CO2-molecules or vice versa ?

• To meet or to mate ?
• That is the mysterious question about photons !

Water vapor condensation makes rain and latent heat warming up the atmosphere and water turning into ice makes latent heat warming up the ocean. "H20 Latent heat" adds up to the photon heat ...

Photons come from the sun and earth can send "longer wave length photons" back but is the sun dominant for the climate on earth ?

NASA Ridicules "Solar Activity Importance" but Doesn't Ignore "Solar Activity" ...

From "Differential and Integral Calculus", NASA may learn that the ocean integrates every difference (positive or negative) on the solar +/-1360W/m2 and shows the result 33 month later in the temperature of all oceans : Global Cooling : To Come In 33 Months ? In the winter of 2022-2023 we will see the result of the cooling oceans before we reach in 2025 the solar maximum 25 predicted to be the 5th lower maximum lower again after already 4 weakening maxima in half a century ...

But : Professor Valentina Zharkova Breaks Her Silence and CONFIRMS “Super” Grand Solar Minimum

• NASA or Valentina ?
• "Global Warming" or "Mini Ice Age" ?
• That is the mysterious solar question !

But Australia is on fire ...

How come ?

• Forest management forgot to do what it takes to maintain and keep the forests safe for wild bushfires ?
• Global Cooling Makes Hot Summers ...
• Australia in Paradox ? ... "Global Cooling Symptoms" ... Not "Global Warming" ...

Meteorites and volcano eruptions are single events but they can blow gases and dust in the atmosphere. Looking at long climate history this dust may have been the end of ice-ages and the beginning of warm ages but these are not part of the continuous process in a stable climate condition.

But over the past 4000 year we see the number of volcano eruptions (volcanoes on land and/or in ocean) rising with a trend of colder and colder cold periodes alternating with warmer periodes on a periodicity of about a millennium as if climate were free oscillating with variable temperature amplitude or is there an external source with variable energy driving earth climate ?

May CCR="Climate Change Revival inspire you all to contribute articles on the climate-topic that you master best ...

Climate is complicated social stuff but we do the best we can and try to explain it as simple as possible but not simpler than that in the group : CCR="Climate Change Revival