In cases of emergency
Andrew Garman
Professor, Health Systems Management; Director, RUSH Center for Health System Leadership at RUSH University
February 17th is Presidents Day in the United States. The holiday celebrates a job that is famously difficult, deserving of ongoing recognition - and extremely powerful, deserving of ongoing scrutiny.
Lately I have been scrutinizing the Declaration of Emergencies, something presidents use to grant themselves temporary access to 150 or so policy power-ups. During his first week in office, the new President signed off on three new ones, including #14156, titled "Declaring a National Energy Emergency."
So... are we in an energy emergency? What are these declarations all about? I decided to do a little digging. Here's what I learned.
What are National Emergencies?
While the U.S. government was designed to have strong checks and balances, it also means the political process takes time. Sometimes the standard process may not move fast enough to address emergent matters needing immediate attention. The National Emergencies Act of 1979 provided a mechanism to afford the President additional powers on a temporary basis, while also attempting to safeguard against its overuse.
Once a President has emergency powers, what's to stop them from keeping them?
The Act is supposed to prevent that, by making them sunset automatically after 12 months unless they were renewed. But has it worked?
I'll let history speak for itself. I created the graph below by calculating the number of active national emergencies (i.e. opened but not yet closed) each year. The graph starts in 1979, which is the year of the oldest declaration that remains active in 2025:
Regardless of which political party has been in power, this "declaration inflation" growth curve has continued to march on.
President aside, is there a 'national energy emergency' in the U.S.?
It depends on how you define emergency. If you define it based on availability, then the answer may be "no" - at least not in any ongoing way. But if you define it based on affordability, the answer may be "yes." A recent CNET survey found that 78%?of US adults were concerned about rising home energy costs, and 24% were cutting back on essential purchases to fit energy bills into their budgets.
But what about the 'climate emergency'? Hasn't that also been declared a national emergency?
Although some 2,364 jurisdictions across 40 countries have declared a climate emergency, so far the U.S. is not one of them. The closest we've come is in 2023, when the former President said he had 'practically' done that - without formally doing it.
Within the U.S., there have been at least 206 local / regional declarations, and at the individual level, more than 75% of surveyed adults in the U.S. believe global warming will be a somewhat or very serious problem in the U.S.
Where does this all leave us?
As noted above, a sizable majority in the U.S. are concerned about both energy affordability and the threats posed by global warming. We won't get very far trying to solve one without the other. With renewables now less expensive than fossil fuels, it is feasible to make progress on both fronts simultaneously.
Recent items of interest
Upcoming events/deadlines
As always, I welcome your comments - and corrections. Thank you for reading, and your help healing our future.
Andy Garman
Corporate Ethics, Decarbonization, and Sustainability Leader World Changing Idea Awardee FastCompany 2020
1 周Andrew Garman must read! Thank you for your clear thinking and masterful ideas!
Environmental Stewardship is Preventative Medicine
2 周If we are in fact in a "National Energy Emergency" as so declared by this president, isn't it interesting he just fired 1,200-2,000 Department of Energy staff? https://www.reuters.com/world/us/sweeping-us-energy-department-layoffs-hit-nuclear-security-loans-office-sources-2025-02-14/
Global Leader in Digital Health Transformation, North America, EMEA, Asia-Pac, Latin America. Expertise in Business & Strategic Client Management, Executive & Cross-Cultural Team Leadership, Complex Program Management.
2 周Thanks Andrew Garman for another excellent newsletter!