Casefile Chronicles
Regalwhiz Law Chambers
Regalwhiz - Company registration| Trademark Registration| Online Legal Services| Online Accounting services| Law firm
Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr vs Mohan Kumar Kotana on 31 January, 2024 (Delhi High Court)
Plaintiffs, who own the ‘Tata Copper Water ' trademark and are seeking registration for 'Tata Copper+ Water', sued the defendant for selling 'VIZAG Gold’s Copper+ WATER' under a similar name and trade dress. Plaintiffs' bottles discovered at the defendant's site. The court granted an ex-parte ad interim injunction prohibiting the disposal of infringing products.
Godrej Agrovet Limited filed a Contempt Petition against Manisha Agro Sciences for violating the "Consent Terms" of a trademark suit involving 'Diamore or Diamore Plus'. The respondents allegedly resumed using the product despite court orders. The court issued a show-cause notice to justify possible contempt proceedings.
The High Court ruled in favour of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement case involving counterfeit products. The plaintiff conducted a survey and made purchases from the defendants. Despite an interim injunction and notice to the defendant, they didn't appear, leading to the court's decree for the plaintiff.
The plaintiff filed a design and trade dress infringement suit against the defendant's 'Prestige' brand. The court had previously issued an interim injunction due to similarities in pressure cooker design and trade dress. Despite being served, the defendant did not appear, resulting in a favourable decree for the plaintiff.
The court rules out that serving documents on the correct email addresses will not count as proper service .Defendants can argue that the has received their service via mail and was not proper. The court dismissed the appeal..
领英推荐
The petitioner filed the suit to restrain the defendant from using a ‘Zari’ device , claiming that it is allegedly identical to their mark , with the trade mark supporting their objection. The court , finding similarity granted an ex part ad intern injection order in favour of plaintiff.
Fever Labs Inc vs Festival House Immersive Exhibit India on 5 February, 2024 (Delhi High Court)
The plaintiff a globally known entrainment company filed a suit for permanent injunction to stop the defendant from using the plaintiff internationally registered mark ‘ Candlelight’. The court granted an interim injunction, finding the defendant had prima facie infringement in the plaintiff mark and shall be restrained from using mark or organising an event.
Sap Se vs Vtech Soft Solutions & Ors. on 29 January, 2024 (Delhi High Court)
The plaintiff SAP SE a software company provided end to end software application sued the defendant for offering pirated SAP software with remote SAP server access through website and actively promoted the its infringing material on social media despite being served with notice the defendant dint appear before the court , leading to present injunction for trademark and copyright infringement.?
70-Mm Talkies Private Limited vs Legend Studios Private Limited on 18 January, 2024 (Bombay High Court)
The plaintiff filed an interim injunction against the release for the biopic on Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant was based on the book on which plaintiff has exclusive right. The court ruled against plaintiff had failed to establish relevant evidence and hence intern i injunction was denied against the defendant.
The Plaintiff, a renowned aviation training institution, filed an application for ad-interim injunction against the Defendant for using the similar mark 'FLY HI. However despite different aviation sectors, the court found potential consumer confusion, granting the interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff.?
The Plaintiff filed an application for interim injunction on the grounds that certain unknown entities had been infringing the personality and publicity rights of the Plaintiff posing as agents and securing clients without authorisation. The court grated a John Doe order, dynamic injunction in favour of plaintiff and compelled the government and social media platform removal of fake accounts.?