Case Study: Lemonade – A Refreshing New Approach to Insurance
Mark Prince
Business Strategy & Growth ? Growth through Strategy ?Growth of Profits ? Expert Price Strategy?Pricing as an Art?Pricing as a Science
In its recent Global Consumer Insurance Survey, accountancy firm EY found that consumers ranked insurance companies below banks, car manufacturers and supermarkets for trustworthiness.
Up there with parking attendants and estate agents, insurance brokers are one of those professions that we love to hate. And it’s easy to see why.
Creating a new insurance policy is hardly inspiring. And the process is always coupled with the feeling that you’re paying hundreds of pounds with nothing to show for it. Even the much touted ‘peace of mind’ is elusive for many with the realisation that should the worst happen, you’ll need to enter battle with the insurance company to receive a payment. From the lengthy form-filling process to the annoyance of escalating premiums, there’s little wonder so many people are put off buying insurance at all.
But as I explore in my article on transparency in the insurance industry, several start-ups are introducing new models that promise to make insurance fairer and more transparent. One such start-up is Lemonade.
Introducing Lemonade
Co-founded by Daniel Schreiber and Shai Wininger in September 2016, New York-based Lemonade offers renters and home insurance for city dwellers.
From its name to its business model; nothing about Lemonade resembles a traditional insurance company. That’s why it’s been heralded as a revolutionary alternative to other insurers; capturing the interest of younger consumers looking for a fairer alternative to traditional insurance.
Even the product’s launch strategy sets it apart. Lemonade launched on Product Hunt – a website that lets users share and discover new products and was the first insurance company to feature on the site.
What makes Lemonade different?
The key differentiator between Lemonade and traditional insurance companies is that it has nothing to gain by denying or delaying claims. While other insurance companies make a profit by keeping insurers’ premiums; Lemonade takes a fixed fee, meaning they can make the claims process quicker and easier for customers.
Crucially, any unclaimed premiums are given to charity via the company’s ‘Giveback’ scheme. When signing up, customers choose the charity they would like to donate to. They are then placed within a peer-to-peer ‘mini community’ of customers who have all chosen the same charity. Their premiums are paid into a joint pot and any money left over after any claims have been paid are given to the charity. Lemonade estimates that around 40 percent of premiums are given to good causes through the scheme. This means that Lemonade and its customers are working together rather than being in conflict with one another.
As Lemonade’s chief behavioural officer Dan Ariely writes on Lemonade’s blog:
“Instead of fighting with our customers over the same coin, we join our customers in fighting for a common cause. That changes everything! It eliminates conflicts of interests, and creates a partnership between Lemonade, our customers, and their chosen non-profit.”
This transparent approach and charitable giving fosters a relationship of trust between Lemonade and its customers. Lemonade knows customers are unlikely to embellish claims as this would mean taking money away from their chosen charity.
How Lemonade uses technology
To complement its transparent approach, Lemonade uses technology to make its processes simple and efficient. As the company’s co-founder Shai Wininger says: “Lemonade is a tech company doing insurance, not an insurer doing an app.”
As a result, the process appeals to young consumers who don’t want to spend hours filling in forms. 81 percent of Lemonade’s customers are aged between 25 and 44; and 87 percent have never bought insurance for their homes before.
Everything from buying insurance to making a claim can be completed via the app and Lemonade says it takes as little as 90 seconds to get insured and just three minutes to get paid.
Making a claim is also simple and uses technology to appeal to consumers. Rather than filling in forms, customers simply record a video testimonial on their phone via the app. The company was also the first insurer to process a claim from start-to-finish with no human interaction. In just a few minutes, a Lemonade customer submitted a claim using his mobile phone. Then with no paperwork or form-filling involved; the claims bot processed the claim, using a series of algorithms to review and check the claim before making the payment. Amazingly, approving and wiring the claim took the bot just three seconds.
The Transparency Chronicles
Look on Lemonade’s blog and you’ll find a series of articles called the ‘Transparency Chronicles’.
Through these, Lemonade details fascinating metrics and performance data – information that other companies would protect at all costs. Providing this information further cements Lemonade’s honest and open ethos, strengthening its appeal with younger consumers who want to buy from ethical companies.
And Lemonade is quickly capturing interest. In one week in January 2017, Lemonade insured 410 new homes and has enjoyed exponential growth of 300 per cent month-on-month in the months following its launch. Lemonade captures data on where customers are switching from and found that they are taking business away from US insurance giants such as the Allstate corporation, State Farm and Liberty Mutual.
As companies like Lemonade begin to bring a fairer and more transparent approach to the insurance industry, I think it’s only a matter of time before consumers demand that all insurance companies follow their lead by offering more socially-responsible and ethical insurance products.
Join the Conversation
New technology is opening up opportunities for ambitious businesses like never before. Keep abreast of evolving technology and new tactics to add to your growth toolbox by joining the conversation at Exceptional Business Growth Strategies for UK SMEs.
More about Mark Prince
Mark Prince is a hugely experienced executive with 30 years of global corporate leadership. Mark delights in the game of business and seeing committed companies grow. Mark has applied his approach of strategy development and deployment in a wide range of industries with an international dimension, including leading companies with £100m+ turnover and creating up to 65% sales growth.
Mark was a speaker at last year’s Growth Hacking World Conference and is the author of the Amazon 5-Star reviewed business book Leading The Crusade.
View more at: www.markbprince.com
Strategist, CIO, CTO, Transformation Director, NED
7 年There seems to be a lot of talk about Lemonade right now and it's worth a look at how insurance could work. There are some interesting models emerging, Neos is another who offer home security backed up by insurance.
CFO na Sompo Seguros
7 年Lucas Prado
Insurance Product / Project Manager
7 年The insurance insustry is ripe for the taking by disruptors, but I'm not convinced that Lemonade is quite there yet. Lemonade is cutting out the middle man and a lot of waste in their process, but in the policy acquisition and underwriting, and on claims processing. Happily, this means they can pass those savings on to the consumer. But, unless those claims bots are very sophisticated, claims are going to drive those premiums up pretty quickly. The fundamental aim of insurance is to spread the cost of insured losses across all policy holders, so clearly the money doesn’t come from nowhere. Consumers will be adept at sniffing out a soft-touch, if that is indeed the case, and that is where the Lemonade business plan could suffer.
Fast Growing Insuretech Agency Owner
7 年You guys are "drinking the ??ade". They take the premium and immediately pay their investor group 20% commish thru Lemonade Insurance Agency, LLC. Then they pay claims, pay internal management costs and reins. Traditional insurance cos do opposite: take premium, pay internal management costs and reins, and build up surplus. Anything left then they pay the investors. Hmmm seems not in the best interest of the most valuable player- The Client.