The case for refurbishment of existing homes
Chat GPT

The case for refurbishment of existing homes

Concern for the environment is a key part of the government's agenda, but there is a conflict with the strong drive to deal with the pressing housing emergency and build, build, build. Replacing 1.5mn social homes lost through Right to Buy will take decades and will demand time, money and innovation.

So one really useful innovation, on top of a commitment to build 300,000 new homes, would be a commitment to refurbish or create 100,000 old homes. We need a government drive to refurbish the broken homes, the empty homes and the buildings that could be recycled to produce new homes. Let's look at the heritage buildings, unsalable offices, hotels and hostels. Let's examine the neglected town centres with unlettable shops, unviable pubs, and run down council estates. A plan for renewal, based on recycling undesirable, old fashioned and neglected buildings would make a significant contribution to the housing crisis, while meeting other important objectives.

For example, refurbishment:

  • has a lower carbon footprint compared to demolition and new build
  • improves the quality and thermal efficiency of existing housing reducing emissions
  • has less impact on existing eco systems, and provides an opportunity to boost biodiversity
  • supports existing communities, and can be expanded to help newcomers integrate and benefit from existing facilities
  • avoids breaking up and dispersing extended families and existing communities
  • preserves the architectural character of neighbourhoolds
  • preserves heritage by giving new purpose to historic and cultural landmarks, maintaining an understanding in local history
  • protects a variety of building types to create interest and learning
  • can be considerably cheaper and quicker than new builds
  • provides opportunities for smaller contractors, local job opportunities, and grants encourage households to do DIY and learn new skills

With these social and environmental advantages what could the government do to support additional housing supply through the refurbishment route?

  1. VAT is not levied on new builds but there is a 20% tax on most refurbishment. While exceptional reductions are available, there should be zero tax on home improvements and refurbishment.
  2. Reintroduce grants or council tax reductions to encourage landlords and home owners to retrofit their homes to achieve energy efficiency
  3. Bring in specific programmes to support the regeneration of towns and estates
  4. Devise a positive pro-heritage programme to find commercial and residential use for older buildings.

Paul Moxham MIET MAPM

MEP Programme/Project/Contract/Compliance Specialist

7 个月

The government started this initiative many years ago within the 6 major cities in England. Look at Liverpools docks, the bullring in Birmingham, the old disused cotton mills in Manchester. From these refurbishment projects were born many other initiatives! Why did they cease?

回复
Chris Elliott

ENFP - Blue Muffin Ltd

7 个月

Local authorities should be given the power to compulsory purchase homes that have been vacant for more than two years and then sell on to HAs.

Dr Colin Barrow CBE

Former businessman, local politician, academic.

7 个月

In reviewing the planning system, the Government could guide planners to tolerate the external changes that allow big internal improvements to happen. Mansard roofs, basements, extensions with low or attractive visual impact. Purity can be the enemy of practicality.

Rachel Simms

Business Development Manager, Virtual Subsidiary PEO and Accounting

7 个月

Brilliant article, makes a lot of sense.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kate Davies CBE FRICS的更多文章

  • Too Much Information!

    Too Much Information!

    Housing associations have so much information they cannot use it to make the improvements they seek. What we actually…

    12 条评论
  • Are you For Profits?

    Are you For Profits?

    Last year I reflected on how I had spent the year since leaving Notting Hill Genesis. NED roles.

    6 条评论
  • Sector Data Risks

    Sector Data Risks

    I always enjoy reading the sector risk profile. It summarises the current focus of regulators that respond to political…

    2 条评论
  • The limitations of the PRS

    The limitations of the PRS

    I was at a very good event organised by Housing Today recently. The highpoint was an address by Paul Hackett of…

    8 条评论
  • Time of reckoning?

    Time of reckoning?

    Social landlords, during the past decades, engaged in sensible commercial activities such as building homes for sale or…

    6 条评论
  • Invest in homes to grow the economy

    Invest in homes to grow the economy

    The UK suffers from low growth, low productivity plus a high level of debt. I don’t envy the Chancellor, trying to…

    19 条评论
  • Estate agents and technology

    Estate agents and technology

    I remember checking the for sale boards and traipsing around local estate agents in the 80s collecting photocopied…

    3 条评论
  • No more money without reform..

    No more money without reform..

    So said the Prime Minister, when reacting to the Darzi report on the critical state of the NHS. Starmer suggested that…

    18 条评论
  • Hope to see you there!

    Hope to see you there!

    I am pleased to be speaking, on behalf of the Open Data Exchange, at the Housing Community Summit. It's great news that…

    5 条评论
  • Tenant involvement

    Tenant involvement

    During my career in social housing I worked with some incredible tenant board members such as Shaun Lansfield BEM Ben…

    7 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了