Carrier v. Broker tension: Who’s gouging who? Are we seeing retaliatory rates?
I’m connected on LinkedIn with some great carriers and brokers, and lately have been spending time reading the comments on many posts. I have been struggling to understand why there is such an ‘us versus them’ mentality between Brokers and Carriers. I have worked for both asset carriers and logistics companies for over 20 years, as well as companies who manage both an asset and logistics divisions, and I understand the frustration on both ends. Nevertheless, I have struggled to understand these adversarial comments. It seems that;
?
Both parties are misplacing blame on their industry counterparts. The freight market is driven by supply and demand, same as any other industry. If your product or service is in demand the rate for your product or service will go up. I won’t patronize with basic economics, so why do some people in our industry seem to not believe supply and demand is driving the market rates? Why are they stuck on the us versus them mentality?
领英推荐
The facts are;
In all these stages, if the capacity had been available, the rates would not have increased to the extent they did. The markets are the root cause of both the favor's or misfortune of Brokers and Carriers. However, I don’t want to disregard the fact that some companies are valuing making a quick dollar over long term sustainable partnerships, and these people are fueling the carrier versus brokerage fire. Nonetheless, it’s just not possible to create a favorable market, and I don’t think Brokers and Carriers are actively attempting to inflict these markets on one another, and I don’t get the adversarial commentary online.
Whether you are an asset carrier, broker, 3PL, or 4PL we all work together as an industry. This should never be an ‘us versus them’ scenario. We all represent the transportation industry. We all have investments that are significant to operate our businesses. We need to work together to build to improve our industry and provide shippers with a great experience that compliments and improves their supply chain.??
Principal at Shadwell Advisory LLC
1 年Bill Robinson My perspective is based on nearly 40 years in capital markets. Buying and selling of freight capacity is a complex and fragmented industry. It is a most difficult market, however, it has some similar characteristics. Brokers are most often bear the brunt of ire especially in turbulent markets. Intermediaries are essential in most markets to improve price formation and reduce search costs to match buyers and sellers. Brokers should be in a position to know both shippers and carriers and their trustworthiness and creditworthiness. Brokers should have an information advantage typically because of their status as intermediaries, if they really know the markets. They are in a position therefore to take advantage of the carriers. The carriers on the other hand realize benefits from brokers in reduced costs and investments in a sales force and information gathering on prospective buyers. The downside is that carriers feel exploited when markets turn since they lack the same amount of information. The lack of transparency on volumes and prices undercuts trust. Without trust, conflict and caterwauling ensue.
Owner, President, Hosty Hauling Inc. Senior Account Manager, A-Action Towing and Recovery Inc.
1 年More and more shippers are going around the broker straight to the carrier. Why?
President / CEO & Owner of Knichel Logistics
1 年Great article ! Couldn’t agree more
Transportation & Supply Chain Leader
1 年Very well said and on point. Great article Bill!
Managing Partner FMi Logistics Inc.
1 年Mike very well said and comes from many years of experience. Trust and being ethical ensures a " win / win " situation. Regards