Be Careful What You Wish for ...
I'm getting nervous with the proliferation of all of these AI-infused chatbots that will change life and work as we now know it. Some of them are wrong. Really wrong.
For example, I just asked Bing’s AI chatbot to describe the difference between Performance-based Hiring and traditional behavioral interviewing. The answer was not even close to being correct! Bard was slightly better but still wrong.
This is critical especially when you're using these tools to guide your company's hiring decisions. There's enough bias and flawed thinking to begin with and getting bad advice is a recipe for disaster.
Now the Bing answer was quite concerning since I thought it was built on the same platform as ChatGPT, but it turned out that when I asked ChatGPT the same question I got the right answer.?
In case you’re interested, here’s the right answer cut and pasted from ChatGPT.?
领英推荐
Overall, while there are similarities between Performance-based Hiring and traditional behavioral interviewing, the differences lie mainly in the emphasis on job-specific performance, problem-solving related to the role, and the recognition of hiring as a two-way process.
Moral: AT chatbots are sometimes right and sometimes wrong.
Just like people.
__________________________________________
Lou Adler?is the CEO and founder of?Performance-based Hiring Learning Systems ?– a consulting and training firm helping recruiters and hiring managers around the world hire more leaders. Lou is the author of the Amazon top-10 best-seller,?Hire With Your Head ?(John Wiley & Sons, 4th Edition, 2021),?The Essential Guide for Hiring & Getting Hired ?(Workbench Media, 2013) and LinkedIn Learning’s?Performance-based Hiring ?video training program (2016). His new course on LinkedIn Learning -?Integrating Performance-based Hiring in into the Performance Management ?(2023) - in now available. Make sure you check out his?Hire with Your Head ?Virtual Book Club ?for the latest hiring ideas and trends.
Developing Shorz - a fully AI automated video editing tool for Windows.
1 年The quality of the outputs wildly differs between different AI-s. Bing is one of the weakest of the bunch currently. The most accurate is GPT4, which is part of OpenAI and ChatGPT(Paid Version). GPT4 is what we use for Talentscreener.ai - copilot for hiring and recruitment. It assesses candidates 90% similar to a professional human hiring manager. In terms of bias, it's actually much less biased than any human when assessing skills and qualifications. We filter out any personal, or cultural info before passing it to AI for analysis and our extensive tests have shown no statistical evidence of a bias in screening candidates. It simply does not see the image or any information about the person that could induce bias.
--
1 年I'm a Kenya Defence force officer,,,I need a job in Canada,,,please assist
Attended Mount Kenya University - MKU
1 年I'll keep this in mind
--
1 年6
Bringing Aerospike to Northern Europe
1 年I'm the biggest AI advocate, especially for making hiring more efficient. Our team is constantly having chats with people who are all about incorporating AI into their hiring processes. It's exciting to hear, but also worrying to understand that many of them want to use AI to decide who to hire straight from the interview, just like that. Thanks for sharing this as a great reminder that we can't just put all our trust in AI, even though it's a game-changing tool to have in our toolkit.