Career | GPTW (Great Place to Work) & WPTW (Worst Place to Work)
A career should always be based on what the professional desires for their life, and from there, whether using a formal plan or an idea pursued as a goal, materialize this objective.
Leaving this responsibility to someone else, such as parents, spouse, boss, or third parties; or even to the organization they work for or provide services to, is a very high risk of not following what is desired and only fulfilling what external entities have defined for the professional's life.
Given this concept of career management, when defining a goal and eventually a plan, it is up to the professional to enter the job market (if they do not go the path of entrepreneurship, which we will not address here). And for this, there is usually a mutual search between those who offer opportunities and those who seek them, and by combining the interests of both sides, a professional relationship is established.
Companies may approach professionals for certain desired positions in order to fulfill the demands set by their managers, and under the responsibility of the Recruitment and Selection area, selection processes are carried out with people who are approached or attracted by the opportunity.
On the professional's side, the practice is to research, based on their aspirations, opportunities, and organizations that offer conditions to satisfy these objectives along with other factors, such as the financial aspect.
In any case, as Max Gheringer has already said, three factors are crucial in choosing a job opportunity: Environment, perspective, and remuneration.
The order of these items should vary according to each professional and their stage of life, but it is said that at least two of these three aspects should be positive when considering accepting a job offer, considering that:
Therefore, how to identify these aspects when evaluating an organization before applying or accepting an invitation?
The traditional way is to research from institutional information to testimonials from employees, former employees, and the involved community. However, nowadays there are institutions that conduct surveys and classify corporations as a good or bad place to develop a career - the so-called GPTW (Great Place to Work).
GPTW
This seal is awarded after organizations go through a research process and, mainly, with (anonymous) reports from employees regarding various aspects that, according to its organizers, determine and respond to this question, making life easier for professionals in the market. Here are the main aspects evaluated:
These criteria may vary depending on the specific GPTW evaluation methodology at a given time, but they generally reflect key factors that contribute to an excellent work environment, giving professionals the ability to assess an organization broadly and without necessarily needing prior experience in that environment.
However, there is, of course, the counterpoint to this research, and although chaotic and without scientific or even ethical foundation: the so-called WPTW (Worst Place to Work).
WPTW
Being the opposite of GPTW, here it is determined which are the worst companies that a professional can have the misfortune of being a part of. This is based on reports from employees, former employees (almost always anonymously or disguised) who use various channels to express what they go through or have gone through and how it affected their lives - serving as a true repellent for good professionals to these companies.
Although it is decentralized, not organized, not official, and even unethical, more and more professionals are informed about it to balance the pros and cons of an environment before entering a process or even a concrete opportunity, and among the various topics addressed, below is an overview that is most relevant in this type of research:
Companies identified as Worst Places to Work generally struggle to attract and retain talent, face productivity issues, and may even face legal issues due to improper workplace practices.
So pay attention to environments with a high turnover rate, very aggressive salaries, and highly challenging goals. Although these last two aspects are highly tempting, they can (but it's not a rule) hide a toxic environment that only consumes the intelligence and health of the professional, discarding them as they can no longer keep up with this frenetic pace and refuse to continuously sacrifice their health and quality of life.
#career #gptw #wptw